Shara_Wynn wrote: »DerAlleinTiger wrote: »Shara_Wynn wrote: »Jealousy and envy are both perfectly normal human emotions. They may be unpleasant emotions, like anger, fear and anxiety, but they are still fundamentally normal human emotions.
Anyone who thinks they are immune to either of these emotions are deluding themselves and perhaps they are the ones that need to acquire a greater level of self awareness.
I say this as a completely stand alone statement, without any context.
You are correct and I don't think anyone in their right mind would assert otherwise.
The problem isn't the emotions, it's the actions taken stemming from them. Those you can control, as I controlled whenever I saw people who were wronged get compensated. No matter how much I thought to myself "Man, I wish I could have gotten that compensation. Too bad I didn't [insert whatever unassuming action led to the issue]." But never did I think "They don't deserve that! I'm being wronged!" let alone advocate for it.
Much like anger, fear, and anxiety no one in their right mind blames or judges someone for feeling those things. They judge them based on their actions following those emotions.
If you have that level of enlightenment and control over your emotions then I applaud you. Buddhist monks will spend their entire life trying to attain what you have.
I wish I could go through life never having my emotions control my actions, but alas, I am an emotional being, my feet are made of clay.
It’s not just about giving people what they’ve lost by not being able to log in through no fault of their own. It’s to apologize to the players most heavily impacted by the studios own errors, and because they don’t want people to avoid PTS now or in the future. There are already far too few testers and far too little response to issues reported during testing. After this mess they need to be really generous with the testers who were impacted.
I wasn’t impacted by this, other than missing one day of play time while NA was down, and I have zero issues with the rewards given to the players locked out of their accounts for nearly a week. I’m giving a heavy side eye to everyone who thinks that their own gameplay is in any way reduced because the PTS victims are heavily compensated.
DerAlleinTiger wrote: »
Obviously, humans aren't perfect. That is why those fables exist in the first place to warn us of our own shortcomings and failings and to try and make us more self-aware of them so we can strive to correct them. At this point, this is well off-topic, apologies. I just don't know how else to explain what the analogy was meant to convey.
Nah what ZoS promised can't be backpedaled anymore, as a few stated already, without causing even more damage
They can still add more tho, I still stand by the fact it ain't compensating what matters (all the dailies, transmute key ect) and undermine those who didn't get banned effort wise if they dont increase drop rate
People are fuming because the grind skip that compensation feels like, in an event with already horrid grinding involved
People see a year worth of seals + all the hardest to get items of the event just handed over for a week of forced downtime to be too much of a good deal so to speak (tho the dailies are quite a massive loss still)
Shara_Wynn wrote: »DerAlleinTiger wrote: »
Obviously, humans aren't perfect. That is why those fables exist in the first place to warn us of our own shortcomings and failings and to try and make us more self-aware of them so we can strive to correct them. At this point, this is well off-topic, apologies. I just don't know how else to explain what the analogy was meant to convey.
Yes, and this was the point I was trying to make. Yet to say one is fully in control of one's emotions is a fallacy.
Off topic, perhaps, but I think people need to cut each other some slack on both sides in this compensation fiasco and let cooler heads prevail.
I'm.... finding all this sort of stuff from "certain of the unaffected" embarrassingly petty and unjustifiably nasty in the extreme.
And yes, I'm one of the "unaffected" myself. I'm fully in favor of everyone locked out of their accounts for over a week being handed whatever on a golden platter to compensate for it.
DerAlleinTiger wrote: »Shara_Wynn wrote: »DerAlleinTiger wrote: »
Obviously, humans aren't perfect. That is why those fables exist in the first place to warn us of our own shortcomings and failings and to try and make us more self-aware of them so we can strive to correct them. At this point, this is well off-topic, apologies. I just don't know how else to explain what the analogy was meant to convey.
Yes, and this was the point I was trying to make. Yet to say one is fully in control of one's emotions is a fallacy.
Off topic, perhaps, but I think people need to cut each other some slack on both sides in this compensation fiasco and let cooler heads prevail.
Never did I claim that anyone was fully in control of one's emotions. That in fact was my entire point that emotions aren't something we can control but our actions that take after them are and there's a sliding scale of understandable reflexive actions based on emotions up to unreasonable reactions based on emotions.
Feeling envious? Natural and unavoidable.
Saying "Man I wish I was in that position?" Understandable.
Crying out that it's unfair and you're wronged for what someone else is compensated with all because of your envy? Unreasonable.
To swing it around to another emotion:
Feeling angry over the bad drop rates on the style pages? Natural and expected.
Making stern posts towards ZOS about the issue and asking the drop rates to be changed? Understandable.
Taking that anger out on people being compensated for a whole other issue out of their control? Unreasonable.
There's a scale between "I am completely and totally in control of all of my emotions and they never affect me" and "I have no control over my actions because of my emotions" and it lies with human expectations of each other tempered by your responsibility and sound reasoning.
And not to be jerk, but... you realize that arguing that we can't control our actions stemming from our emotions only to say that we should "let cooler heads prevail" is extremely contradictory, yes? The entire meaning of "cooler heads" is people who are in control over their actions in spite of their emotions.
I'm.... finding all this sort of stuff from "certain of the unaffected" embarrassingly petty and unjustifiably nasty in the extreme.
And yes, I'm one of the "unaffected" myself. I'm fully in favor of everyone locked out of their accounts for over a week being handed whatever on a golden platter to compensate for it.
People looking at it see it as being punished by bad drop rate and ludicrous grind for not being at the wrong place at the wrong time
"I could have spend all that time grinding away doing something else even if its on another game and get more out of it by not playing ESO" tend to be the first reaction I have seen plenty in comments about videos speaking of this fiasco