As said before, I don't know if zos actions are legally correct, but they definitely leave me with some bad feelings. And I won't even comment about the transphobic statements from parts of the community. They're simply disgusting.
Companies retain the right to terminate employment for any reason and without giving notice why, it's in the agreement we all sign when we're hired. Whatever ZOS may or may not have done, I doubt was illegal.
As said before, I don't know if zos actions are legally correct, but they definitely leave me with some bad feelings. And I won't even comment about the transphobic statements from parts of the community. They're simply disgusting.
Companies retain the right to terminate employment for any reason and without giving notice why, it's in the agreement we all sign when we're hired. Whatever ZOS may or may not have done, I doubt was illegal.
I won't argue against that, because (as was said before) I don't have enough knowledge of US law to make a justified opinion on this. In my country it would definitely be a topic for labor court, but we also have a different legal system in europe.
Nonetheless I'm sure that there were better possibilities to deal with this matter and the actions of HR, if they happened as described (and until now I have no reason to doubt that), leave me with a bad taste.
The fact that the mods have removed posts, but said nothing and left the thread open is, interesting?
Also I agree with RaikaNA this thread should not be here. 17 pages so far of ToS violations.
The fact that the mods have removed posts, but said nothing and left the thread open is, interesting?
I mean, ZOS makes the rules here, so they get to decide how to enforce them, but what part of this discussiond is kosher under this section of the code of conduct:
2.12 We do not allow the discussion of any legal matters involving ZeniMax Media Inc, its affiliates or any of their associated companies through ZeniMax Services and Sites.
I mean, ZOS makes the rules here, so they get to decide how to enforce them, but what part of this discussiond is kosher under this section of the code of conduct:
2.12 We do not allow the discussion of any legal matters involving ZeniMax Media Inc, its affiliates or any of their associated companies through ZeniMax Services and Sites.
I mean, ZOS makes the rules here, so they get to decide how to enforce them, but what part of this discussiond is kosher under this section of the code of conduct:
2.12 We do not allow the discussion of any legal matters involving ZeniMax Media Inc, its affiliates or any of their associated companies through ZeniMax Services and Sites.
The fact that the mods have removed posts, but said nothing and left the thread open is, interesting?
Just guessing:
1/ Zos employees do actually care about the incident, and each other. (T/F according to your level of cynicism)
2/ Legal department wants it open to claim non-discriminatory behaviour everywhere. (T/F according to your level of cynicism)
3/ Get data on the reaction of a section of customer base (not good data since regardless of ingame pve/pvp preferences, forum users engage in forum pvp.)
4/ ...
According to @ZOS_GinaBruno 's post https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/60843/
The following rules have been broken on this thread:
- Abusive Language and Disruptive Behavior
- Bashing and Slanderous Comments
- Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation
- Demands and Threats
- Flaming
- Hate Speech
- Inappropriate Content and Language (Real-world religion and politics)
- Naming-and-Shaming
- Rude and Insulting Comments
- Thread Bumping
- Trolling or Baiting
Why make the rules when they're not going to be enforced?
According to @ZOS_GinaBruno 's post https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/60843/
The following rules have been broken on this thread:
- Abusive Language and Disruptive Behavior
- Bashing and Slanderous Comments
- Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation
- Demands and Threats
- Flaming
- Hate Speech
- Inappropriate Content and Language (Real-world religion and politics)
- Naming-and-Shaming
- Rude and Insulting Comments
- Thread Bumping
- Trolling or Baiting
Why make the rules when they're not going to be enforced?
Whether people like it or not, this issue is here to stay and will be revisited time and time again. We can either continue to dig in our heels and refuse to progress, which serves no one, or we can be like water and flow to meet the needs of an evolving population/workforce.
As said before, I don't know if zos actions are legally correct, but they definitely leave me with some bad feelings. And I won't even comment about the transphobic statements from parts of the community. They're simply disgusting.
Companies retain the right to terminate employment for any reason and without giving notice why, it's in the agreement we all sign when we're hired. Whatever ZOS may or may not have done, I doubt was illegal.
I won't argue against that, because (as was said before) I don't have enough knowledge of US law to make a justified opinion on this. In my country it would definitely be a topic for labor court, but we also have a different legal system in europe.
Nonetheless I'm sure that there were better possibilities to deal with this matter and the actions of HR, if they happened as described (and until now I have no reason to doubt that), leave me with a bad taste.
Carcamongus wrote: »Another common argument being used here is that people are being accused of transphobia for having different views. That's only partially correct: if you just disagree with Leona's side, consider there's not enough evidence from both sides to reach a conclusion or believe this forum isn't the place to discuss this topic, among other views, you're not being transphobic. However, if you say things like being trans is a fantasy and you can't be what you aren't, then yes, that's quite transphobic. These are, of course, just examples. In sum, not agreeing with a trans person isn't transphobic, but demeaning said person for being trans is.
jcasini222ub17_ESO wrote: »For the love of God buff WW.
(If not remove the shield penalty on blazing shield in Cyro; huzzah blazplars!)
NordSwordnBoard wrote: »According to @ZOS_GinaBruno 's post https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/60843/
The following rules have been broken on this thread:
- Abusive Language and Disruptive Behavior
- Bashing and Slanderous Comments
- Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation
- Demands and Threats
- Flaming
- Hate Speech
- Inappropriate Content and Language (Real-world religion and politics)
- Naming-and-Shaming
- Rude and Insulting Comments
- Thread Bumping
- Trolling or Baiting
Why make the rules when they're not going to be enforced?
1 Shut it down and lose customers, potentially a large number, no real way to predict that. The people with real attachment to this issue may very well speak with the wallet.
2 leave it open the people complaining it's not shut down will continue to play the game, but be mad about this thread.
3 Revenue is king, don't fool yourself. They made these rules, they are not a social contract or bill of rights. They can ignore them at will, who would stop them?
Nothing is going to happen. This "issue" just like the recent Blizzard scandals. People will moan and groan and threaten to quit and blah blah with their wallet but ultimately not do anything and keep playing because they're addicted.NordSwordnBoard wrote: »1 Shut it down and lose customers, potentially a large number, no real way to predict that. The people with real attachment to this issue may very well speak with the wallet.
2 leave it open the people complaining it's not shut down will continue to play the game, but be mad about this thread.
3 Revenue is king, don't fool yourself. They made these rules, they are not a social contract or bill of rights. They can ignore them at will, who would stop them?
spartaxoxo wrote: »Carcamongus wrote: »Another common argument being used here is that people are being accused of transphobia for having different views. That's only partially correct: if you just disagree with Leona's side, consider there's not enough evidence from both sides to reach a conclusion or believe this forum isn't the place to discuss this topic, among other views, you're not being transphobic. However, if you say things like being trans is a fantasy and you can't be what you aren't, then yes, that's quite transphobic. These are, of course, just examples. In sum, not agreeing with a trans person isn't transphobic, but demeaning said person for being trans is.
If someone is disagreeing with Leona on the basis of "people are tired of LGBT politics" or "other trans people did annoying, bad things" then that is also transphobia. If they're disagreeing because there isn't enough evidence, that's fair. If the reason they are claiming there isn't enough because they've automatically prejudged Leona as guilty of lying without reviewing her evidence with no bias because "I don't support trans" that's also transphobia.
What other transpeople are doing, and LGBT movement in general, should have any bearing on Leona's case.
Nothing is going to happen. This "issue" just like the recent Blizzard scandals. People will moan and groan and threaten to quit and blah blah with their wallet but ultimately not do anything and keep playing because they're addicted.NordSwordnBoard wrote: »1 Shut it down and lose customers, potentially a large number, no real way to predict that. The people with real attachment to this issue may very well speak with the wallet.
2 leave it open the people complaining it's not shut down will continue to play the game, but be mad about this thread.
3 Revenue is king, don't fool yourself. They made these rules, they are not a social contract or bill of rights. They can ignore them at will, who would stop them?
And the blizz scandals were actually legit. Way more legit than someone getting asked to resign cause they wouldn't show up to work and committing a felony in the process.
Nothing is going to happen. This "issue" just like the recent Blizzard scandals. People will moan and groan and threaten to quit and blah blah with their wallet but ultimately not do anything and keep playing because they're addicted.NordSwordnBoard wrote: »1 Shut it down and lose customers, potentially a large number, no real way to predict that. The people with real attachment to this issue may very well speak with the wallet.
2 leave it open the people complaining it's not shut down will continue to play the game, but be mad about this thread.
3 Revenue is king, don't fool yourself. They made these rules, they are not a social contract or bill of rights. They can ignore them at will, who would stop them?
And the blizz scandals were actually legit. Way more legit than someone getting asked to resign cause they wouldn't show up to work and committing a felony in the process.
exactly and people will keep paying for their monthly subscriptions because you know... the craft bag :O