boi_anachronism_ wrote: »If they were listening they could have saved themselves a lot of this if they had pushed off 2 patches and fixed pvp. The rules in pve and pvp cannot coexist the way they are. One will always be op or being nerfed into oblivion and that's just the truth.
xylena_lazarow wrote: »
xylena_lazarow wrote: »Agreed, it obviously wasn't just "knee-jerking" when ZOS themselves already agreed to at least partially revert or rework several of the changes. Trust won't come back any time soon though, not when they haven't said a word about things like completely butchering Templars, dumpstering PvP damage and deleting most DoT skills from PvP, etc.The entire knee-jerk tweet was arrogant and dismissive to the entire community and an apology should be issued.
xylena_lazarow wrote: »Agreed, it obviously wasn't just "knee-jerking" when ZOS themselves already agreed to at least partially revert or rework several of the changes. Trust won't come back any time soon though, not when they haven't said a word about things like completely butchering Templars, dumpstering PvP damage and deleting most DoT skills from PvP, etc.The entire knee-jerk tweet was arrogant and dismissive to the entire community and an apology should be issued.
Agreed. They will need many incrementals if not updates to clean up all the remaining messes they made.
I think the feedback around heavy attack damage and the implications of light attacks not scaling at all was pretty clear. It's super unintuitive that your light attacks do the same damage with a white weapon vs a gold weapon.rageofodin wrote: »If there was, why not just continue to test and implement those changes vs reverting them based on knee jerk feedback?