✋
Might I recommend a poll, though? This is likely to be closed due to the unproductive nature of the request.
I'm actually pretty happy to have a new PvP meta every 3 months, but not when it's due to massive damage nerfs and deleting entire builds or playstyles. Tank metas in this PvP are extremely boring.silver1surfer69 wrote: »Totally not. I have fatigue of the ppl screaming because it is a change, no matter if the change brings good or bad.
This is what happens when you add more complexity (mostly via items) to a game than your QA team can handle.
From a player point of view, yeah it's tiresome even if we understand that they're just trying to play catch up to the messes they create.
xylena_lazarow wrote: »I'm actually pretty happy to have a new PvP meta every 3 months, but not when it's due to massive damage nerfs and deleting entire builds or playstyles. Tank metas in this PvP are extremely boring.silver1surfer69 wrote: »Totally not. I have fatigue of the ppl screaming because it is a change, no matter if the change brings good or bad.
FantasticFreddie wrote: »Not all change is bad.
We loved the stickerbook and quest markers for writs, the new content and new zones, while not quite as good as some of their pre-Covid stuff have been good and the new trials have been excellent, companions and card game, while not exactly my cup of tea, have been largely popular.
Giant sweeping balance changes, that are directly opposite previous giant sweeping balance changes? Highly unpopular, and for good reason. Change needs to feel like we are moving forward, gaining something worthwhile, and refining previous ideas.
Making light and heavy attacks both scale from your highest stats while releasing content with your highest dps check yet and then a couple of months later turning around and removing ALL scaling from light and heavy attacks and nerfing damage is just poor planning, confusing, and overall bad practice.
