There are plenty of costumes and motifs in various states of skimpiness. There are surely specific variations or styles that aren't there, but there definitely many options beyond unequipping your armor.I just got the Soul Shriven Skin from the Endeavour Store, mainly because it looked great the way the preview of it showed it on my unclothed (well, in underwear actually) character. Not being familiar with skins, this being the first one I actually tried out, I didn't think too hard and just figured that it would work like the polymorph, ie. wysiwyg. So I was a little disappointed to find that the only way to actually see the entire skin in game is to unequip all of my armour. Not really a viable proposition unless I want to go to the trouble of undressing every time I'm around town and then redressing for quests etc. An "undressed" costume would be a nice fix for this. Am I the only one who'd like to see such an option?
SilverBride wrote: »I don't see the appeal of skimpy clothing. It's not a look my characters want to portray.
SilverBride wrote: »I don't see the appeal of skimpy clothing. It's not a look my characters want to portray.
SkaraMinoc wrote: »Check out Crimson Oath, Ancient Daedric, Woold Elf style, Fang Lair, Paravant's Letale and maybe some others.
Edit: I totally forgot about the battle bra, Scorianite Gladiator

SilverBride wrote: »I don't see the appeal of skimpy clothing. It's not a look my characters want to portray.
Kiralyn2000 wrote: »SilverBride wrote: »I don't see the appeal of skimpy clothing. It's not a look my characters want to portray.
Well, not everyone has the same preferences. Luckily, we have dozens of motifs & costumes to pick between. Plenty of room to have a wide variety.
(personally, I grew up with the silly cover artwork of the 60s/70s/80s fantasy novels, D&D books, and Heavy Metal magazine. Boris Vallejo, Keith Parkinson, Larry Elmore, Luis Royo, Christos Achilleos, Nene Thomas, Rowena Morrill, and many others... Barbarians & sorceresses in utterly impractical "armor" is Fantasy to me.)
spartaxoxo wrote: »Any further and you'd be (half) naked.
We need more choices of all varying styles .. too many motifs just seem variations upon similar ones. We need more options for skimpier wearing without metallic collars or weird metal arm bands etc
I cannot see how anyone could complain about more choice, if you prefer another look then you choose something else!
SilverBride wrote: »I feel that too much skin, such as with the Holiday in Balmora costume's huge cutout at the chest, just make a character look cheap.
oldbobdude wrote: »My issue with lack of skin is that we have more than a few skins as rewards. Most Costumes cover the skins. No armor shows the skins but, well, no armor. I’ve been using that Nord bathing suit ugly thing to show skins like dead lands firewalker and the dragon scales one.
AyeshaBelladonna wrote: »SilverBride wrote: »I don't see the appeal of skimpy clothing. It's not a look my characters want to portray.
So then don't use it. lol For those of us that would like some, it would be nice to have the option. And personally, I think it's be GREAT to have more options in clothing period. why can't we get more styles that give normal clothing options, skimpy or otherwise? Not everything needs to be battle-ready for looks, and some of the costume combos are just ultra disappointing in their lack of dye options.
Normal clothing is limited to pieces of non-armor we can thieve but then are stuck with how it looks color-wise and sacrifice armor to wear. or costumes. It would be nice to see the outfit styles start branching out. Including an "underwear" option lol.
spartaxoxo wrote: »Any further and you'd be (half) naked.
SilverBride wrote: »I feel that too much skin, such as with the Holiday in Balmora costume's huge cutout at the chest, just make a character look cheap.
SammyKhajit wrote: »It’s too cold to run around half naked or full naked! What if you fall over on some gravel??? Khajit has furs that protect him, but what about the furless/scaleless ones? That’s gotta hurt.