vivisectvib16_ESO wrote: »lmao wtf is this supposed to mean?
Not very difficult to understand, all people are different, some enjoy pixel romances, others save their emotions for the real world...
When you have the choice between romance with a sentient avatar or a dumb NPC.. IMHO the 2nd route would be like a lazy solution for a fear problem or something thet will not get addressed.. Now if you have a GF or BF in real life, some could react very negatively in knowing that you'd use your leisure time for cheap romance with dumb NPC rather than themselves
For me at least; it was nice to come home, be approached by your spouce, enter a dialogue window and for them to say something like "oh you're home! I made this for you, my love" (I don't remember exact lines I need to marry someone in my current Skyrim pt) and I'd always be like "awww, thank you".
For me it seemed too... shallow. Not enough dialogue, too many repetitions. In the end it was just returning home, "Hi, darling! Here's your cake! Here's your gold! Bye!" Always the same text.
Also, finding a potential spouse wasn't that much of an emotional or immersive thing either. What kind of bond do you even have to a person who married you after you've barely spoken 2 sentences before? There were npcs who married you just because you won a tavern brawl, sold them firewood or even gave them one single gold coin. That wasn't exactly convincing and I'm glad they have more detailed quests in mind for the ESO companions.
When you have the choice between romance with a sentient avatar or a dumb NPC.. IMHO the 2nd route would be like a lazy solution for a fear problem or something thet will not get addressed..
Now if you have a GF or BF in real life, some could react very negatively in knowing that you'd use your leisure time for cheap romance with dumb NPC rather than themselves
When you have the choice between romance with a sentient avatar or a dumb NPC.. IMHO the 2nd route would be like a lazy solution for a fear problem or something thet will not get addressed.. Now if you have a GF or BF in real life, some could react very negatively in knowing that you'd use your leisure time for cheap romance with dumb NPC rather than themselves
I suspect that some people fear that their real partner might be hurt, regardless of whether it is about an avatar or a dumb NPC. But what do I know.
LadyLethalla wrote: »IMO what he doesn't know about an imaginary romance won't hurt him.
I suspect that some people fear that their real partner might be hurt, regardless of whether it is about an avatar or a dumb NPC. But what do I know.
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »If someone's partner gets jealous or upset with them because of a fictional character, romance or not. Then that relationship have some issues.
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »I suspect that some people fear that their real partner might be hurt, regardless of whether it is about an avatar or a dumb NPC. But what do I know.
If someone's partner gets jealous or upset with them because of a fictional character, romance or not. Then that relationship have some issues.
Aaah, the rose-tinted nostalgia goggles, I wear them from time to timeFor me at least; it was nice to come home, be approached by your spouce, enter a dialogue window and for them to say something like "oh you're home! I made this for you, my love" (I don't remember exact lines I need to marry someone in my current Skyrim pt) and I'd always be like "awww, thank you".
For me it seemed too... shallow. Not enough dialogue, too many repetitions. In the end it was just returning home, "Hi, darling! Here's your cake! Here's your gold! Bye!" Always the same text.
Also, finding a potential spouse wasn't that much of an emotional or immersive thing either. What kind of bond do you even have to a person who married you after you've barely spoken 2 sentences before? There were npcs who married you just because you won a tavern brawl, sold them firewood or even gave them one single gold coin. That wasn't exactly convincing and I'm glad they have more detailed quests in mind for the ESO companions.
I do agree with you there - I literally only married Balimund cause he was the first one to notice the amulet, lol. But he grew on me.
I think he was the only NPC I married and this was probably my first playthrough from years ago, but I do remember it fondly. Maybe rose tinted nostalgia goggles but still.
LadyLethalla wrote: »IMO what he doesn't know about an imaginary romance won't hurt him.
LadyLethalla wrote: »
IMO what he doesn't know about an imaginary romance won't hurt him. I mean, I was infatuated for a long time with the main character of the novel I've been writing for nearly 20 years. It in no way affected my relationship with my husband.
I did a quick search for "romance" in the bar and couldn't really find a discussion like I was thinking of.
Honest opinions on if you'd like an optional romance path with some of the NPCs? (I mean... Darien Gautier... for example)
I'm a huge Dragon Age fan, and I live for my romancable NPCs in that game.. I have a romancable NPC shaped hole in my soul as I wait for Dragon Age 4 to release.
I know some people aren't interested in the slightest, but, even in DA they are completely optional and can absolutely be ignored. So you wouldn't be forced into them if you don't want it.
I personally love them cause they're adorable and it makes me happy, same as I love getting a happy ending for 2 lovers in a side quest.
This year's Smolder Scrolls left me wanting more in the main game, since we got a Fennorian romance for 5 seconds.. That sated my DA4 romance yearning for a while, lol.
So, what do you think?
If you would like romance options, who would you choose?
I really do like Fenn, so I think he'd be my choice
I think you're setting yourself up for a failure if you're expecting Bioware level romances, but if you go in there expecting it to be about on par with other Bethesda games like Skyrim and Fallout 4 you should be fine.
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »I'd like to echo the idea that RPing romance with real people is weird. Pixel crushes or romancing an NPC for *** and giggles is fine, but toying with other people's feelings (even mutual toying), "RP-zoning" and outright cheating is the biggest no-no.
What cheating and toying with people's feelings? "In character" and "out of character" are different things. Just because one thing lead to another, and my dunmer started to like a a friend's dunmer thanks to a bunch of interactions, it doesn't mean we are having a thing. That's story like anything else in RP, and not that much different than liking an npc for your characer and thinking of stories with them. Is my partner bothered by this? Of course not, because it's harmless nerdy roleplaying. At most I get a loving eyeroll when I'm discussion with friends how horrible our characters are together.
I know that not everyone seperate IC and OOC, but that's not the norm and on them, not RP itself. And if you find it weird, then you find it weird. Nothing can be done about that, because people like different things. But saying it's cheating and toying with people's feelings is not a roleplaying thing.