redspecter23 wrote: »I think with enough hybridization options added there won't be a "stam build" or a "mag build" anymore. You'll just have "dps templar" or "dps warden" and it will lean into one attribute slightly more than the other. The lines are starting to get blurred enough that making the easy distinction between them is getting harder and harder.
Is stam getting short-changed? Only if you consider the traditional stam/mag builds exclusively when moving forward. Both sides, stam and mag, will adjust and meet somewhere in the middle. If you can't get stam to perform as well as mag, the expectation may be that you shift slightly more into mag and play it that way instead.
Jman100582 wrote: »redspecter23 wrote: »I think with enough hybridization options added there won't be a "stam build" or a "mag build" anymore. You'll just have "dps templar" or "dps warden" and it will lean into one attribute slightly more than the other. The lines are starting to get blurred enough that making the easy distinction between them is getting harder and harder.
Is stam getting short-changed? Only if you consider the traditional stam/mag builds exclusively when moving forward. Both sides, stam and mag, will adjust and meet somewhere in the middle. If you can't get stam to perform as well as mag, the expectation may be that you shift slightly more into mag and play it that way instead.
Well the thing that's going to stop that from happening is sustain and sources of major buffs like sorcery/brutality. The game was never really designed with hybrids in mind from its core, and its going to take a good year or two of not only set changes but class changes too to make good proper hybrid builds viable
CleymenZero wrote: »With magicka being able to use Kinras, AY, and Tzogvin, what has stam gained in terms of sets to make up for that.
Stam had a slight advantage in terms of sets and that's what made them competitive DPS-wise but with mag getting the best stam sets, what's left for stam?
CleymenZero wrote: »With magicka being able to use Kinras, AY, and Tzogvin, what has stam gained in terms of sets to make up for that.
Stam had a slight advantage in terms of sets and that's what made them competitive DPS-wise but with mag getting the best stam sets, what's left for stam?
I don't think magicka can get much use of AY given the proc conditions.
How is Bahsei's unusable? Work 1-2 mag dump skills into your rotation and it's a free damage boost. Plus some extra pen if you wear body pieces.
Also, it's becoming increasingly fashionable to have a vMA staff backbar, though it's up to you if you consider that "hybrid" instead of "stam".
redspecter23 wrote: »I think with enough hybridization options added there won't be a "stam build" or a "mag build" anymore. You'll just have "dps templar" or "dps warden" and it will lean into one attribute slightly more than the other. The lines are starting to get blurred enough that making the easy distinction between them is getting harder and harder.
Is stam getting short-changed? Only if you consider the traditional stam/mag builds exclusively when moving forward. Both sides, stam and mag, will adjust and meet somewhere in the middle. If you can't get stam to perform as well as mag, the expectation may be that you shift slightly more into mag and play it that way instead.
CleymenZero wrote: »With magicka being able to use Kinras, AY, and Tzogvin, what has stam gained in terms of sets to make up for that.
Stam had a slight advantage in terms of sets and that's what made them competitive DPS-wise but with mag getting the best stam sets, what's left for stam?
I don't think magicka can get much use of AY given the proc conditions.
light attacks with daggers proc it right?
CleymenZero wrote: »CleymenZero wrote: »With magicka being able to use Kinras, AY, and Tzogvin, what has stam gained in terms of sets to make up for that.
Stam had a slight advantage in terms of sets and that's what made them competitive DPS-wise but with mag getting the best stam sets, what's left for stam?
I don't think magicka can get much use of AY given the proc conditions.
light attacks with daggers proc it right?
They do proc AY yes. People don't always know all the facts before they post. It's ok.
ke.sardenb14_ESO wrote: »Medusa's existance is effectived invalidated by tzogvin, granted most stam builds used beast trap anyway.
Now why bahsei is an issue is because is is no better then relequin and AY. It works and it could be strong, but nothing hits quite like either set.
I doubt that mag will use rele if 7 light is still meta, but it is not impossible to achieve.
ke.sardenb14_ESO wrote: »Medusa's existance is effectived invalidated by tzogvin, granted most stam builds used beast trap anyway.
Now why bahsei is an issue is because is is no better then relequin and AY. It works and it could be strong, but nothing hits quite like either set.
I doubt that mag will use rele if 7 light is still meta, but it is not impossible to achieve.
7 light hasn't been meta since before the kilt... It's even less meta now, with 2 medium being pretty common. In any case, rele jewels and front bar would pair well with Bahsei for some magicka toons especially those that don't spend long on the back bar. As long as your weaving is on point
I'm kind of glad stam won't be carried by superior sets any more. It'll mean it becomes even more painfully obvious how far behind they are, and ZoS can start balancing them in earnest.
ke.sardenb14_ESO wrote: »Medusa's existance is effectived invalidated by tzogvin, granted most stam builds used beast trap anyway.
Now why bahsei is an issue is because is is no better then relequin and AY. It works and it could be strong, but nothing hits quite like either set.
I doubt that mag will use rele if 7 light is still meta, but it is not impossible to achieve.
7 light hasn't been meta since before the kilt... It's even less meta now, with 2 medium being pretty common. In any case, rele jewels and front bar would pair well with Bahsei for some magicka toons especially those that don't spend long on the back bar. As long as your weaving is on point
I'm kind of glad stam won't be carried by superior sets any more. It'll mean it becomes even more painfully obvious how far behind they are, and ZoS can start balancing them in earnest.
I thought stam was not desirable for end game, so how are they carried by superior sets? I've always heard the pve meta wa magicka.
Having tested ONLY stamina dps on PTS and getting 107-113k per class, and seeing others who got 117k on several. There is 0 translation of mag sets that became worth it on stamina dps. This hybridization PURELY benefits magicka dps and not stamina DPS. Bahsei on paper sounds good but even on a build where I had maintained 10-20% max mag pool it was absolutely not worth it when compared to AY/Kinras/Pillar of Nirn. The hybridization just helped Mag by giving them Stam's sets.
CleymenZero wrote: »CleymenZero wrote: »With magicka being able to use Kinras, AY, and Tzogvin, what has stam gained in terms of sets to make up for that.
Stam had a slight advantage in terms of sets and that's what made them competitive DPS-wise but with mag getting the best stam sets, what's left for stam?
I don't think magicka can get much use of AY given the proc conditions.
light attacks with daggers proc it right?
They do proc AY yes. People don't always know all the facts before they post. It's ok.
SidraWillowsky wrote: »CleymenZero wrote: »CleymenZero wrote: »With magicka being able to use Kinras, AY, and Tzogvin, what has stam gained in terms of sets to make up for that.
Stam had a slight advantage in terms of sets and that's what made them competitive DPS-wise but with mag getting the best stam sets, what's left for stam?
I don't think magicka can get much use of AY given the proc conditions.
light attacks with daggers proc it right?
They do proc AY yes. People don't always know all the facts before they post. It's ok.
Oh please.... most mag players don't use daggers, nor do they want to.
CleymenZero wrote: »Having tested ONLY stamina dps on PTS and getting 107-113k per class, and seeing others who got 117k on several. There is 0 translation of mag sets that became worth it on stamina dps. This hybridization PURELY benefits magicka dps and not stamina DPS. Bahsei on paper sounds good but even on a build where I had maintained 10-20% max mag pool it was absolutely not worth it when compared to AY/Kinras/Pillar of Nirn. The hybridization just helped Mag by giving them Stam's sets.
Now, how do we get the dev's attention?
CaffeinatedMayhem wrote: »So, mag builds get better by using stam sets/skills and STAM is getting short changed?
Um, the fact that mag skills and sets SUCK so much that we get better using stam sets means MAG is shortchanged, and has been for some time.
MashmalloMan wrote: »CaffeinatedMayhem wrote: »So, mag builds get better by using stam sets/skills and STAM is getting short changed?
Um, the fact that mag skills and sets SUCK so much that we get better using stam sets means MAG is shortchanged, and has been for some time.
As already stated, mag in PvE is meta for end game, Stam is niche. The only positive they had was better sets, without that, they've got nothing in comparison.
Mag has more synergies, more survivability, more dps from range, more aoe dps and now the stronger Stam sets too.
MashmalloMan wrote: »CaffeinatedMayhem wrote: »So, mag builds get better by using stam sets/skills and STAM is getting short changed?
Um, the fact that mag skills and sets SUCK so much that we get better using stam sets means MAG is shortchanged, and has been for some time.
As already stated, mag in PvE is meta for end game, Stam is niche. The only positive they had was better sets, without that, they've got nothing in comparison.
Mag has more synergies, more survivability, more dps from range, more aoe dps and now the stronger Stam sets too.