SydneyGrey wrote: »The cat voice acting is pretty terrible, in my opinion. One of them says "NO THIEF!!! THIS ONE!!!" as if she's saying two different sentences, but really she's trying to say "No thief this one!"
I'd get the birds. The birds are excellent.
SydneyGrey wrote: »The cat voice acting is pretty terrible, in my opinion. One of them says "NO THIEF!!! THIS ONE!!!" as if she's saying two different sentences, but really she's trying to say "No thief this one!"
I'd get the birds. The birds are excellent.
Ugh, this bothers me so much, lol. It's like Zos did not even instruct how some lines should be read/preview the voice acting. I'm going to probably end up replacing her, not even sure why I got her tbh.
SydneyGrey wrote: »The cat voice acting is pretty terrible, in my opinion. One of them says "NO THIEF!!! THIS ONE!!!" as if she's saying two different sentences, but really she's trying to say "No thief this one!"
I'd get the birds. The birds are excellent.
you are all reading this line almost as wrong as the voice actors deliver it
"no thief, this one. Your things, safer with ezabi then in some stuffy vault".
meaning don't give your things to some thief banker, ezabi will take them and keep them safe
SydneyGrey wrote: »The cat voice acting is pretty terrible, in my opinion. One of them says "NO THIEF!!! THIS ONE!!!" as if she's saying two different sentences, but really she's trying to say "No thief this one!"
I'd get the birds. The birds are excellent.
you are all reading this line almost as wrong as the voice actors deliver it
"no thief, this one. Your things, safer with ezabi then in some stuffy vault".
meaning don't give your things to some thief banker, ezabi will take them and keep them safe
No, she is saying that she is no thief.
SydneyGrey wrote: »The cat voice acting is pretty terrible, in my opinion. One of them says "NO THIEF!!! THIS ONE!!!" as if she's saying two different sentences, but really she's trying to say "No thief this one!"
I'd get the birds. The birds are excellent.
Ugh, this bothers me so much, lol. It's like Zos did not even instruct how some lines should be read/preview the voice acting. I'm going to probably end up replacing her, not even sure why I got her tbh.
read what I just said before deleting poor ezabi. Also if you put her on a redguard pillow at home she will lay down perfectly on it when you speak to her then rise again in the middle crushed part...it's perfect
Sylvermynx wrote: »Eh, no. I understand it as "Ezabi is no thief. She will take care of all your things, good and not so good."
Parsing Khajiit-speak is a difficult endeavor for those who perhaps haven't played Khajiit for decades. Since I've played Khajiit any time I've had the chance, I get what she's saying just fine.
Sylvermynx wrote: »I haven't ever heard the VA. Hate VA. I go by subtitles. In any case, all Khajiit (except those inexplicably reared by - um - orcs, for instance) say things just as she does: by stating the end premise first, with the "this one", or "she", or her name after. So on this the end premise is "I'm not a thief."
Which makes sense, where Ezabi calling herself a thief when accepting one's treasures simply wouldn't make any sense at all.
Sylvermynx wrote: »I haven't ever heard the VA. Hate VA. I go by subtitles. In any case, all Khajiit (except those inexplicably reared by - um - orcs, for instance) say things just as she does: by stating the end premise first, with the "this one", or "she", or her name after. So on this the end premise is "I'm not a thief."
Which makes sense, where Ezabi calling herself a thief when accepting one's treasures simply wouldn't make any sense at all.
Sylvermynx wrote: »I haven't ever heard the VA. Hate VA. I go by subtitles. In any case, all Khajiit (except those inexplicably reared by - um - orcs, for instance) say things just as she does: by stating the end premise first, with the "this one", or "she", or her name after. So on this the end premise is "I'm not a thief."
Which makes sense, where Ezabi calling herself a thief when accepting one's treasures simply wouldn't make any sense at all.
the rest of the line confirms I'm correct though...she's saying bankers are thieves, your things are safer with her then in some vault. If your understanding is correct then she would be saying she's not a thief, your things are safer with her then in some vault...which makes no sense because why would things be safer with a 'non-thief' then a vault? Makes sense that bankers are thieves so don't trust their vaults