Keep in mind that the ring just subtracts 50% from your critical hits down to a minimum of 0% additional crit damage, it doesn't halve the damage. The wording is a bit weird in the notes.
SidraWillowsky wrote: »
MurderMostFoul wrote: »Keep in mind that the ring just subtracts 50% from your critical hits down to a minimum of 0% additional crit damage, it doesn't halve the damage. The wording is a bit weird in the notes.
wait what???????
so are you saying that if you have +60% crit damage (base 50% + 10%), then equip mala, you are down to +10% crit damage?
Has that confirmed/tested?
SidraWillowsky wrote: »
It's 100% correct. That's how it works, I know that for certain. It always subtracts 50%. So if you don't have crit damage modifiers, you'll deal no crit damage.
SidraWillowsky wrote: »SidraWillowsky wrote: »
It's 100% correct. That's how it works, I know that for certain. It always subtracts 50%. So if you don't have crit damage modifiers, you'll deal no crit damage.
OK, I trust you. So it should really read "Subtracts 50 percentage points from your crit damage."
That seems pretty brutal, but I guess someone who knows more than I needs to find the point where 16% damage done is producing higher numbers than the crit when malacath isn't equipped.
MurderMostFoul wrote: »SidraWillowsky wrote: »SidraWillowsky wrote: »
It's 100% correct. That's how it works, I know that for certain. It always subtracts 50%. So if you don't have crit damage modifiers, you'll deal no crit damage.
OK, I trust you. So it should really read "Subtracts 50 percentage points from your crit damage."
That seems pretty brutal, but I guess someone who knows more than I needs to find the point where 16% damage done is producing higher numbers than the crit when malacath isn't equipped.
hence the point of my spreadsheet, but now I need to change all the formulas. But it's not looking good for Mala with the SUBTRACTION of 50% crit damage
SidraWillowsky wrote: »MurderMostFoul wrote: »SidraWillowsky wrote: »SidraWillowsky wrote: »
It's 100% correct. That's how it works, I know that for certain. It always subtracts 50%. So if you don't have crit damage modifiers, you'll deal no crit damage.
OK, I trust you. So it should really read "Subtracts 50 percentage points from your crit damage."
That seems pretty brutal, but I guess someone who knows more than I needs to find the point where 16% damage done is producing higher numbers than the crit when malacath isn't equipped.
hence the point of my spreadsheet, but now I need to change all the formulas. But it's not looking good for Mala with the SUBTRACTION of 50% crit damage
Yeah... I'm wondering how numbers for some proc sets are going to increase based on weapon/spell damage, and if there's no cap on the damage values, building for weapon/spell damage may produce some large numbers that Malacath will buff to high hell