SilverBride wrote: »scorpius2k1 wrote: »Getting mudballed a few times in cities or other busy areas doesn't constitute harassment.
Provide some proof if it is otherwise so!
Doing it repeatedly to stop someone from opening a safebox or chest does. Especially when they are sending you offensive whispers at the same time. And I will provide proof to ZoS when I file a complaint.
SilverBride wrote: »scorpius2k1 wrote: »Did you miss the part that porting out has just the same effect, and is already in the game.
So your "solution" is to stop what you are doing and leave rather than stop the harassment? No. I have the right to do what I want where I want and no other player has the right to run me off.
scorpius2k1 wrote: »So your "solution" is the other person has no right to throw mudballs at you at all, a feature that is built into the game? The logic has to work both ways.
scorpius2k1 wrote: »Vayln_Ninetails wrote: »PizzaCat82 wrote: »Now depending on where you are, you may not have to deal with this menace. But its a blight on our beautiful cities, rotton meat in front of every daily turn in, and quest giver, etc. Its a low-key form of harassment, and after repeated appeals to stop, the situation has only gotten worse.
How convenient you left off the option to say no. Lol. Seems like a biased poll? (Memeing mainly, no worries. I know not being able to edit sucks.)
Also the correct answer is no.
Absolutely a biased topic.
Also, NO to the poll.
Cloudtrader wrote: »This conversation is giving me flashbacks to the absolute drama over forced emotes in LOTRO. What worked there was a toggle so you wouldn't be affected by the forced emotes, but they still advanced the other persons deed/achievement if they used them on you. There was no visual cue it worked, but the usage wasn't lost on the system and still counted.
Could do the same here to stop griefers from messing with RP parties. It's pretty much a win-win with no downside, except to the griefers, and who even likes those types of people anyway?
While we're at it, can the toggle include that stupidly loud horn noise memento that people like to blare nonstop, too?
scorpius2k1 wrote: »SilverBride wrote: »scorpius2k1 wrote: »Did you miss the part that porting out has just the same effect, and is already in the game.
So your "solution" is to stop what you are doing and leave rather than stop the harassment? No. I have the right to do what I want where I want and no other player has the right to run me off.
So your "solution" is the other person has no right to throw mudballs at you at all, a feature that is built into the game? The logic has to work both ways.
As with many things in-game, context is very important. The act of standing and squatting over another NPC or character to teabag them can be considered a form of harassment which can be a violation of the Terms of Service (ToS). As with all forms of harassment, if a player asks you to stop a behavior, you need to stop. If you continue to teabag someone that asks you to stop, that is a violation of the ToS and may lead to your account being suspended or even permanently banned. Hope this helps clear things up
Zos said it would be handled on a case-by-case basis but logically speaking it is easy to see how constantly throwing mudballs can cross the line. In the same token, it can be just as easy to see someone maybe a little over-sensitive to what harassment which is why we, as individuals playing ESO, are not judge and jury.
SilverBride wrote: »Zos said it would be handled on a case-by-case basis but logically speaking it is easy to see how constantly throwing mudballs can cross the line. In the same token, it can be just as easy to see someone maybe a little over-sensitive to what harassment which is why we, as individuals playing ESO, are not judge and jury.
I wouldn't call someone over-sensitive because they have a lower threshold for annoying behavior. And it's not the right of any player to continue an annoying behavior until they find that threshold.
Until ZoS takes action just report and show proof of any harassment. Maybe if they get enough complaints they will realize this is a problem and do something about it.
Don't understand all of you who are against a toggle... if YOU think it FUN... then you can keep at default... and those who think its an asinine attempt at middle school humor can toggle it off...
Don't understand all of you who are against a toggle... if YOU think it FUN... then you can keep at default... and those who think its an asinine attempt at middle school humor can toggle it off...
I doubt Zos will make those moments useless which is exactly what a toggle would do. Pretty most of the people that would not have the toggle set to off would be those who do not know about the toggle.
PizzaCat82 wrote: »Don't understand all of you who are against a toggle... if YOU think it FUN... then you can keep at default... and those who think its an asinine attempt at middle school humor can toggle it off...
I doubt Zos will make those moments useless which is exactly what a toggle would do. Pretty most of the people that would not have the toggle set to off would be those who do not know about the toggle.
They could simply have a tooltip when getting hit or interacting with momentos to turn them off, the same way you could activate a synergy.. make it lower priority than most actual interactions and it shouldn't cause much an issue for people.
Regardless, I am very confident Zow will not provide a toggle to avoid being the target of one of these moments altogether. It makes no sense to render a moment useless.
SilverBride wrote: »
Getting hit randomly from time to time is not harassment
scorpius2k1 wrote: »SilverBride wrote: »scorpius2k1 wrote: »Did you miss the part that porting out has just the same effect, and is already in the game.
So your "solution" is to stop what you are doing and leave rather than stop the harassment? No. I have the right to do what I want where I want and no other player has the right to run me off.
So your "solution" is the other person has no right to throw mudballs at you at all, a feature that is built into the game? The logic has to work both ways.
Grianasteri wrote: »I wont vote because there is no option for, "leave things as they are thanks, I like meat, mud, snow, berries etc".
Why would you not have that as an option in your poll?
Integral1900 wrote: »Let’s face it, any thought that these things are being used for fun is delusional.
...
These items in their current form are used for one reason and one reason alone, the same reason that the pie exists, it is to give bullies and those who get their jollies from harassment a tool to torment, pester, and intimidate other players.
Integral1900 wrote: »Let’s face it, any thought that these things are being used for fun is delusional.
Integral1900 wrote: »I spent several years working with the victims of bullying and the consequences that come with it. What is a joke to one person is a crippling experience to another. There are many players in this game who are here because it allows them to escape pressures in the world that they can do nothing about. Items such as these mudballs cannot fail to be anything but a toxic influence.
Integral1900 wrote: »I do not think they were introduced out of malice, but there is certainly a considerable amount of ignorance in their implementation.
Integral1900 wrote: »These items in their current form are used for one reason and one reason alone, the same reason that the pie exists, it is to give bullies and those who get their jollies from harassment a tool to torment, pester, and intimidate other players.
Integral1900 wrote: »These things should never have been put in the game but as they are then I would certainly be willing to pay whatever price the studio deems fit in order to be immune to them. For the love of God get rid of the stuff!
SilverBride wrote: »