Little upset here, I bought the game a second time on steam just to be able to play ESO on my PC or on my Shield in the living room. Also love doing things like crafting on my phone while I watch TV. I bought a Shield just for this option. Pls don't do this
Rather than use Geforce now, I could hire a computer with a half decent GPU in the cloud from any number of suppliers.
Then i could install steam on that computer and via remote desktop, I could "stream" that game back to my laptop at home.
Now, I accept that streaming a game over RDP would not be very good, but at the end of the day it would work and there is absolutely nothing Steam or Bethesda can do to stop me.
Now, if these companies keep pulling out of Geforce now. Then Nvidia can simply move to the model of renting out computers in the cloud, this would be more expensive, maybe $10 a month rather than what they charge now. As you would need some permanent cloud storage per person.
These rented computers would have a piece of software that compresses WHATEVER is on the screen and sends it down the line. Basically doing the same thing that they do now to compress and deliver video at the moment, but detached from any gaming platform, it would be installed on the rented computers operation system.
These are my thoughts on the matter, feel free to pick holes in my argument.
Rather than use Geforce now, I could hire a computer with a half decent GPU in the cloud from any number of suppliers.
Then i could install steam on that computer and via remote desktop, I could "stream" that game back to my laptop at home.
Now, I accept that streaming a game over RDP would not be very good, but at the end of the day it would work and there is absolutely nothing Steam or Bethesda can do to stop me.
Now, if these companies keep pulling out of Geforce now. Then Nvidia can simply move to the model of renting out computers in the cloud, this would be more expensive, maybe $10 a month rather than what they charge now. As you would need some permanent cloud storage per person.
These rented computers would have a piece of software that compresses WHATEVER is on the screen and sends it down the line. Basically doing the same thing that they do now to compress and deliver video at the moment, but detached from any gaming platform, it would be installed on the rented computers operation system.
These are my thoughts on the matter, feel free to pick holes in my argument.
Thats the funny thing, GeForce makes no money from the games. You just play the games you bought on their servers. For $5.99 a month you are renting access to a PC for your games. Why game companies are bailing is not on GeForce. It's greed of deals they are signing with companies like Google. It's the whole exclusive thing all over again. Halo for Xbox, FF for Sony, Mario for Nintendo. These game companies are going to have us subbing to 10 different platforms.
VaranisArano wrote: »Rather than use Geforce now, I could hire a computer with a half decent GPU in the cloud from any number of suppliers.
Then i could install steam on that computer and via remote desktop, I could "stream" that game back to my laptop at home.
Now, I accept that streaming a game over RDP would not be very good, but at the end of the day it would work and there is absolutely nothing Steam or Bethesda can do to stop me.
Now, if these companies keep pulling out of Geforce now. Then Nvidia can simply move to the model of renting out computers in the cloud, this would be more expensive, maybe $10 a month rather than what they charge now. As you would need some permanent cloud storage per person.
These rented computers would have a piece of software that compresses WHATEVER is on the screen and sends it down the line. Basically doing the same thing that they do now to compress and deliver video at the moment, but detached from any gaming platform, it would be installed on the rented computers operation system.
These are my thoughts on the matter, feel free to pick holes in my argument.
Thats the funny thing, GeForce makes no money from the games. You just play the games you bought on their servers. For $5.99 a month you are renting access to a PC for your games. Why game companies are bailing is not on GeForce. It's greed of deals they are signing with companies like Google. It's the whole exclusive thing all over again. Halo for Xbox, FF for Sony, Mario for Nintendo. These game companies are going to have us subbing to 10 different platforms.
If you haven't done so already, you might want to do some of the reading on why it's more complicated than that.
https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/2/21161469/nvidia-geforce-now-cloud-gaming-service-developers-controversy-licensing
https://www.pcgamer.com/the-controversy-over-geforce-now-explained
hey i just got GeForce NOW (free version for now) to play ESO because it's starting to work worse over time even on lowest settings, and as i see in task manager it's forcing my computer very much (old potato).
i have ESO on Steam, but i don't find it in the GeForce NOW panel (other games like the Witcher appear there) with Steam library synced. Does it even work? did it use to work? what i must do?
hey i just got GeForce NOW (free version for now) to play ESO because it's starting to work worse over time even on lowest settings, and as i see in task manager it's forcing my computer very much (old potato).
i have ESO on Steam, but i don't find it in the GeForce NOW panel (other games like the Witcher appear there) with Steam library synced. Does it even work? did it use to work? what i must do?
“We spoke at length about GeForce Now and why it rocks on a recent episode of our Full Nerd podcast, and its value proposition isn’t limited to gamers alone. Nvidia’s service doesn’t sell you games directly. Instead, it basically rents you a gaming PC in the cloud, and you sign into gaming platforms like Steam, the Epic Game Store, and (formerly) Battle.net to play games you already own. Nvidia doesn’t take an extra cut. By giving you access to more powerful hardware than you might already own, GeForce Now effectively encourages you to buy more games through existing storefronts. It feels like a win-win for everybody involved… It’s not an all-you-can-eat-buffet subscription like Netflix or Hulu. Activision isn’t losing out even if the company decides to start its own rival cloud gaming service.”
“I’m devastated by this news. I played Elder Scrolls Online for hours everyday on GeForce Now because I don’t have a gaming PC,” said CallmeFishmeal. “I will wait it out and see what happens while the free Founders membership is active. If I don’t see any improvement when it’s time to renew the subscription, I’m out. I’m not mad at Nvidia, although more communication would be nice, but I understand there are probably things that legally can and cannot be disclosed to customers, I’m just upset that Bethesda chose this path to pull all its games from GeForce Now and not worried about upsetting their fans. Seems to me they should try harder to get their games out to as many people as possible.”