DTStormfox wrote: »I agree with SlimeBro1
Why is this even a topic of discussion? Why care that some hairstyles, facial hair, or costumes are bound to genders?
DTStormfox wrote: »I agree with SlimeBro1
Why is this even a topic of discussion? Why care that some hairstyles, facial hair, or costumes are bound to genders?
I find the question why some people reacts so butthurt at the idea of women with beards or guys in dresses much more interesting.
Never understood why those people care so much about what other people do/like. As long as nobody gets hurts and nobody is forces to do anything against their will it's really none of your business to force your views on others.
(Not specifically aimed at the quoted poster)
DTStormfox wrote: »I find the question why some people reacts so butthurt at the idea of women with beards or guys in dresses much more interesting.
Never understood why those people care so much about what other people do/like. As long as nobody gets hurts and nobody is forces to do anything against their will it's really none of your business to force your views on others.
(Not specifically aimed at the quoted poster)
You assume people are reacting butthurt. You assume people care much about what other people do/like. You assume people are forcing views on others. Your reply says more about you than about me or anyone else questioning why this even is a topic of discussion.
DTStormfox wrote: »I agree with SlimeBro1
Why is this even a topic of discussion? Why care that some hairstyles, facial hair, or costumes are bound to genders?
I'm embarrassed to admit that I sincerely thought the beard was in fact a bust (statuette)... as is evident from my original post, I really need to pay more attention! Thanks for pointing this out, @Danikat.When I began playing, I made the mistake of purchasing the adornments cosmetic pack without realising I could check its contents first for the items' compatibility with my race and gender. Needless to say I was disappointed to find how much of that pack was therefore unusable, particularly the jewellery; it seems ridiculous that various circlets and earrings are gender-specific.
Also, what in Oblivion inspired ZOS to have the female-only Seastone Browplate as a daily reward this month?
I suspect they decided to include the beard, realised they'd get tons of complaints if they made a reward that only male characters can use (many ESO players only have 1 character) so they picked an unreleased jewellery design and arbitrarily made it female-only to balance it out.
In magical world with dragons, unicorns and people transforming into many things you draw the line at beards on woomen because that's unrealistic? XD As I said, fake beards exist, and in Tamriel magic and magical curses do exist too. So attaching a beard to a lady shouldn't really be a challenge to a skilled mage or craftsman.As for BEARDS, only "*** carriers" can have them in real life. In the few cases where we have hormonal imbalances and women have facial hair, I think a very thin "old shaolin monk" style beard is the best they can do. So I mean, "gender preference" and all - but those who were not physically born to have a beard, won't have any - unless they undergo heavy hormonal therapy for years, and in the end they will have a soft and pretty thin beard anyway.Regarding clothing, I have never had a problem to put a "CIS female" costume on a male character; not that I have ever worn any on them - just briefly while looking through what costumes I have.
There might be a few things, like these flowers you can have in your hair, that you can't equip on a male character. But on the other hand, I can't use all khajiit/argonian adornments on human/mer races either.
This feels suspiciously more like a real world political statement, masquerading as an "in-game-problem". I have seen many *** type characters around all over the game, so I can hardly see this is a huge problem. By all means, express your concerns - but can we please have the staff work on actual functionality/performance problems instead? And the actual GLITCHES we have with some costumes and such?
Seems like whataboutism to me. Sure, there are bugs and such in this game but no one's saying here that gender locked items are the biggest problem about ESO. There are always several threads going on about lag, servers and general bugs, one thread about something else doesn't really hurt anyone, and also it's not like the same team works on adornments and servers.
As for "this feeling suspiciously like real world political statement", what else can people say for you to believe them it's not? I already said, it's not some PC issue for me, I really have no horse in this race, except for wanting more customisation options.
In magical world with dragons, unicorns and people transforming into many things you draw the line at beards on woomen because that's unrealistic? XD As I said, fake beards exist, and in Tamriel magic and magical curses do exist too. So attaching a beard to a lady shouldn't really be a challenge to a skilled mage or craftsman.As for BEARDS, only "*** carriers" can have them in real life. In the few cases where we have hormonal imbalances and women have facial hair, I think a very thin "old shaolin monk" style beard is the best they can do. So I mean, "gender preference" and all - but those who were not physically born to have a beard, won't have any - unless they undergo heavy hormonal therapy for years, and in the end they will have a soft and pretty thin beard anyway.Regarding clothing, I have never had a problem to put a "CIS female" costume on a male character; not that I have ever worn any on them - just briefly while looking through what costumes I have.
There might be a few things, like these flowers you can have in your hair, that you can't equip on a male character. But on the other hand, I can't use all khajiit/argonian adornments on human/mer races either.
This feels suspiciously more like a real world political statement, masquerading as an "in-game-problem". I have seen many *** type characters around all over the game, so I can hardly see this is a huge problem. By all means, express your concerns - but can we please have the staff work on actual functionality/performance problems instead? And the actual GLITCHES we have with some costumes and such?
Seems like whataboutism to me. Sure, there are bugs and such in this game but no one's saying here that gender locked items are the biggest problem about ESO. There are always several threads going on about lag, servers and general bugs, one thread about something else doesn't really hurt anyone, and also it's not like the same team works on adornments and servers.
As for "this feeling suspiciously like real world political statement", what else can people say for you to believe them it's not? I already said, it's not some PC issue for me, I really have no horse in this race, except for wanting more customisation options.
I have heard those kind of arguments before "In a world of dragons and bla bla...", as some kind of defense for just about anything. Yeah sure - but nothing whatsoever have suggested to me, that these basic human functions should be any different. This is after all Elder Scrolls, not Teletubbies.
As comparison, it's a little like when a guy thought siege weapons did too much damage to players, and I was like "You know how many ranks of enemy soldiers a ballista bolt goes straight through? No?", and he was like "Dude, I'm shooting beams out of my palms, there are elves - this is not the real world!", and I went like "Well. Whatever. But there are ballistas in our world, and this one. I can't see the reason why they should be significantly different".
I don't really care tbf, but I still can't see the problem. We could apply the same "whataboutism" and "in a magical world with dragons" rhetoric, and say "maybe the unisex kind of jewelry/hairstyles and what not is not a part of this world".
Perhaps it's so easy, that some parts of characters are gender specific (like head shape), and certain hair styles etc. don't fit both. I doubt they will "re-do" these, and as some pointed out - newer haircuts seems to suit both.
Are you serious with this right now? Like 100% serious? Dude it's an MMO, where customizing your character is one of the big appeals to people. There are people who spend hours getting a look they want down. This has nothing to do with real world political statements and the fact that you're saying you feel like it does says a lot more about you than those of us who just want more customization options (especially because the gender locks on most of the cosmetics make NO SENSE, and I highly doubt it's because of model limitations if they can make a dress fit to male bodies, which are drastically more different than the difference between male and female head/face models).This feels suspiciously more like a real world political statement, masquerading as an "in-game-problem". I have seen many *** type characters around all over the game, so I can hardly see this is a huge problem. By all means, express your concerns - but can we please have the staff work on actual functionality/performance problems instead? And the actual GLITCHES we have with some costumes and such?
Um, that ship has already sailed, you know that for example Tamriel has gay marriage?Beastygrowls wrote: »This is a game. It has lore. It has a history. This isn't a place for IRL PC societal mores.
Ectheliontnacil wrote: »[
Finally whilst I agree that beards for female characters would seem unusual (although not unheard of in real life) I can't see any reason for the headband to be gender-locked, other than so they can say there's one item for male characters and one for female.
Maybe they could introduce the "peach fuzz" beard for female characters, that wouldn’t be too unusual :P.
While I'm personally not interested in giving my female chars beards, I'm not sure why it would be unrealistic or breaking TES lore?! In a world where magic is common, it could be a curse. Or it could be a fake beard because the female char disguises herself as a man (which also happened in rl in different time periods for different reasons). There were so many possible explanations for a bearded female char - I don't see a problem there.
Same goes for hairstyles and jewelry. Which is the part I care more about. There are so many "female" hairstyles which would also look good on a male char, it's a pity that I can't use them. Although I understand that there might be technical reasons - on the other hand there are also clipping problems with costumes and armor, ZOS has not cared about that, and with jewelry or hair it couldn't be worse, I think?Um, that ship has already sailed, you know that for example Tamriel has gay marriage?Beastygrowls wrote: »This is a game. It has lore. It has a history. This isn't a place for IRL PC societal mores.
It's not even necessarily a pc issue. Many rl cultures were perfectly fine with same sex couples, even centuries and millenia ago. Think of ancient Greece, Persia or Japan. The condemation of homosexuality roots in certain religions and/or traditions. Regions without them had no problems with gay people. So, if we think about the faiths existing in Tamriel, there doesn't have to be a taboo about homosexuality. There doesn't even neccessarily have to be a distinction between couples of a different or of the same sex. There had been such cultures, historically.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mv3ScKLD1Vc&t=9sWell of course that in the world full of racial wars, slavery and various power struggles every culture agrees about gay marriage.
But maybe it just feels that way because it's the first time in TES games you meet marriages like this. I know it was possible to marry the same sex person in Skyrim, but I don't really remember npc's like that. There's a first time for everything.If there were characters like that in previous TES installments then they must've slipped my mind, sorry.
Well of course that in the world full of racial wars, slavery and various power struggles every culture agrees about gay marriage.
It might be hard to imagine since the 3 monotheistic "world religions" had such an influence in rl, but many cultures untouched by them really did not care if anyone had a same-sex relationship. It was one way to live and it was not seen as a problem. Often it changed as soon as the first missionaries (or even just travellers) arrived and established their views. Same goes to nudity by the way, formerly no problems, Christians arrived, taught the people that it's shameful and god will punish them if they behave to sinfully - from that on, women had to cover their upper body. You can see that quite well on historical drawings or even early photographs from Asia. No matter if in India, China, Thailand,... Traditionally, in those hot climates, people weren't wearing much, especially those who worked outside in the heat all day. Women often walked around bare-chested, and no one found it wrong. It was just normal, before other people came and shamed them for it. Now imagine a world without that religious influence. No one would care, because it was considered normal. Same goes for same-sex relationships. It was no issue before someone made it into one. It's perfectly possible that never happened in Tamriel.
But maybe it just feels that way because it's the first time in TES games you meet marriages like this. I know it was possible to marry the same sex person in Skyrim, but I don't really remember npc's like that. There's a first time for everything.If there were characters like that in previous TES installments then they must've slipped my mind, sorry.
There was a dead male Nord couple on Solstheim in Skyrim. In Oblivion, you had that son of the fighters' guild master who was in love with a comrade. And there were probably even more, but those are the ones I still remember. Oh, and in Morrowind you had Vivec. But that's a bit... complicatedAnd Crassius Curio. How could I forget him.
Ectheliontnacil wrote: »
Still, I don't really see anything wrong with that per se, although those dialogues did seem to me kinda on the nose.
Wasn't Crassius Curio obsessed with a certain maid in a book so popular that it even managed to travel back in time into the Second Era? You're telling me he was gay on top of it too? I completely don't remember that. And Vivec also? I thought he was Almalexia's lover. I must replay Morrowind, it's been too long.
Thank you for putting that image in my head. XDEctheliontnacil wrote: »
Meet an ill-tempered Telvanni and everything may happen :P
Nevermind. Maybe it's just my unconcious bias or something. I agree, people love who they love and it's nobody else's business.Still, I don't really see anything wrong with that per se, although those dialogues did seem to me kinda on the nose.
But why? Most of the time NPCs just refer to their husband or wife and you only get that it's a gay couple because of the gender of the NPCs saying it. It's not like they're declaring their gayness to you every second. "Hi there, I'm gay! And my gay husband happens to be kidnapped. May you help a poor gay couple?" - Now that would be annoying, even for me! But in TES, it seems like a absolute non-issue to me. People just love whom they love. Period.
Wasn't Crassius Curio obsessed with a certain maid in a book so popular that it even managed to travel back in time into the Second Era? You're telling me he was gay on top of it too? I completely don't remember that. And Vivec also? I thought he was Almalexia's lover. I must replay Morrowind, it's been too long.
Both are bisexual. Crassius Curio flirts heavily with your char, no matter what gender you chose. There is also another NPC who mentions that you remind him of Crassius' last lover. Of course it's just that they did not change the dialogue according to the char's gender - but they could have, easily. As for Vivec, it's only mentioned in the 36 lessons. Of course it could just be Vivec's imagination, but if he was 100% straight, would he portrait himself like this?
We can continue this in PM's if you like, or make a seperate thread. I'd just hate to derail this thread from the topic of unisex adornments even further.