If you farm your weapon pre-patch, that means you can do it again and are ready for them! go get them tiger! if you looking for a cheezy way don't play mmo!
@idk so if they give us a warning you are ok with highering gear cap when they rework CP?
Ye but over 85% of votes on this poll of over 500 voters says otherwise.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/529210/is-it-ok-to-introduce-cp170-gear/p1
Ye but over 85% of votes on this poll of over 500 voters says otherwise.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/529210/is-it-ok-to-introduce-cp170-gear/p1
Believe me... I expect that when they rework CP, the gear cap will be the least of your concerns, no matter how much warning they give you.
This is a brand new weapon that has never been in the game before so in fact, we have always had to grind to get new gear added to the game so Rich's choice makes absolute sense.As far as I have read, the only reason given to us is they say these weapons are new. I'm skeptical because typically when gear is changed our gear reflects the changes. I suppose that since our previously classified vet arena weapons still exist in the game something had to be called new. The problem for us who have the weapons is that we had vet weapons but now we have normal weapons. While my weapons do not have the bonus, the fact that I ran vet content for them did not change. In my opinion the weapons should have been upgraded.
Here is the announcement thread which is currently 37 pages long with the focus being mainly on customer dissatisfaction. The thread is still open for comments as of this writing.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/521860/
GrumpyDuckling wrote: »This is a brand new weapon that has never been in the game before so in fact, we have always had to grind to get new gear added to the game so Rich's choice makes absolute sense.As far as I have read, the only reason given to us is they say these weapons are new. I'm skeptical because typically when gear is changed our gear reflects the changes. I suppose that since our previously classified vet arena weapons still exist in the game something had to be called new. The problem for us who have the weapons is that we had vet weapons but now we have normal weapons. While my weapons do not have the bonus, the fact that I ran vet content for them did not change. In my opinion the weapons should have been upgraded.
Here is the announcement thread which is currently 37 pages long with the focus being mainly on customer dissatisfaction. The thread is still open for comments as of this writing.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/521860/
No, what you are saying is wrong -- it does not make "absolute sense" because what you say is easily disproved based on precedent of previous "brand new" sets.
ZOS has introduced new names for sets, new bonuses for sets, and changed sets in ways that had previously never existed before, but (since 2016) they have always done this WITHOUT players needing to re-do the exact same content to receive the updated versions. Not updating existing VMA/VDSA weapons is unprecedented -- it does not make sense with how they have handled sets in the last 3-4 years.
GrumpyDuckling wrote: »This is a brand new weapon that has never been in the game before so in fact, we have always had to grind to get new gear added to the game so Rich's choice makes absolute sense.As far as I have read, the only reason given to us is they say these weapons are new. I'm skeptical because typically when gear is changed our gear reflects the changes. I suppose that since our previously classified vet arena weapons still exist in the game something had to be called new. The problem for us who have the weapons is that we had vet weapons but now we have normal weapons. While my weapons do not have the bonus, the fact that I ran vet content for them did not change. In my opinion the weapons should have been upgraded.
Here is the announcement thread which is currently 37 pages long with the focus being mainly on customer dissatisfaction. The thread is still open for comments as of this writing.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/521860/
No, what you are saying is wrong -- it does not make "absolute sense" because what you say is easily disproved based on precedent of previous "brand new" sets.
ZOS has introduced new names for sets, new bonuses for sets, and changed sets in ways that had previously never existed before, but (since 2016) they have always done this WITHOUT players needing to re-do the exact same content to receive the updated versions. Not updating existing VMA/VDSA weapons is unprecedented -- it does not make sense with how they have handled sets in the last 3-4 years.
Not at all, The new weapon is not changing sets. It is a new weapon added to the game and nothing I said has been disproven here.
RIch stated they are new weapons and as such we will have to grind to get them as we would with any other new gear item added to the game.
But its not new content. Not making them perfected and giving the same exact weapon so many had to put countless hours into to get into normal mode is insulting.
I fail to see how this question has anything to do with this new weapon.
GrumpyDuckling wrote: »GrumpyDuckling wrote: »This is a brand new weapon that has never been in the game before so in fact, we have always had to grind to get new gear added to the game so Rich's choice makes absolute sense.As far as I have read, the only reason given to us is they say these weapons are new. I'm skeptical because typically when gear is changed our gear reflects the changes. I suppose that since our previously classified vet arena weapons still exist in the game something had to be called new. The problem for us who have the weapons is that we had vet weapons but now we have normal weapons. While my weapons do not have the bonus, the fact that I ran vet content for them did not change. In my opinion the weapons should have been upgraded.
Here is the announcement thread which is currently 37 pages long with the focus being mainly on customer dissatisfaction. The thread is still open for comments as of this writing.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/521860/
No, what you are saying is wrong -- it does not make "absolute sense" because what you say is easily disproved based on precedent of previous "brand new" sets.
ZOS has introduced new names for sets, new bonuses for sets, and changed sets in ways that had previously never existed before, but (since 2016) they have always done this WITHOUT players needing to re-do the exact same content to receive the updated versions. Not updating existing VMA/VDSA weapons is unprecedented -- it does not make sense with how they have handled sets in the last 3-4 years.
Not at all, The new weapon is not changing sets. It is a new weapon added to the game and nothing I said has been disproven here.
"The new weapon is not changing sets." Excellent, I am glad you agree because then based on the precedent of how ZOS has handled previous sets, then existing VMA/VDSA weapons should be updated. Thanks for the help.
I fail to see how this question has anything to do with this new weapon.
As I already explained, it is the essence between linear gear progression vs vertical gear progression, since v16, ESO had only vertical gear progression, that's what made it special compared to other MMOs, while the introduction of perfected arena weapons is linear progression. Same as highering gear cap.
The question is where do they stop pushing linear gear progression. Perfected Monster sets? Higher gear cap when they rework CP? Higher gear cap every update?
I mean, the justification for it is the same one. It is the new 2021 car model. You don't deserve it for free just because u had the 2020 model. It is the same thing they did with vMA weapons. Just on a bigger scale.
And now there are two options.
1. They don't want to introduce linear gear progression into the game, but they are fine with doing it once if it harms only veterans. (Out of ignorance or spite, it doesn't really matter).
2. They want to slowly introduce more linear gear progression.
What scares me is 2. And I am for the last month trying really hard to make sure the community understand that this is the problem, and raise their voices against it.
GrumpyDuckling wrote: »GrumpyDuckling wrote: »This is a brand new weapon that has never been in the game before so in fact, we have always had to grind to get new gear added to the game so Rich's choice makes absolute sense.As far as I have read, the only reason given to us is they say these weapons are new. I'm skeptical because typically when gear is changed our gear reflects the changes. I suppose that since our previously classified vet arena weapons still exist in the game something had to be called new. The problem for us who have the weapons is that we had vet weapons but now we have normal weapons. While my weapons do not have the bonus, the fact that I ran vet content for them did not change. In my opinion the weapons should have been upgraded.
Here is the announcement thread which is currently 37 pages long with the focus being mainly on customer dissatisfaction. The thread is still open for comments as of this writing.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/521860/
No, what you are saying is wrong -- it does not make "absolute sense" because what you say is easily disproved based on precedent of previous "brand new" sets.
ZOS has introduced new names for sets, new bonuses for sets, and changed sets in ways that had previously never existed before, but (since 2016) they have always done this WITHOUT players needing to re-do the exact same content to receive the updated versions. Not updating existing VMA/VDSA weapons is unprecedented -- it does not make sense with how they have handled sets in the last 3-4 years.
Not at all, The new weapon is not changing sets. It is a new weapon added to the game and nothing I said has been disproven here.
"The new weapon is not changing sets." Excellent, I am glad you agree because then based on the precedent of how ZOS has handled previous sets, then existing VMA/VDSA weapons should be updated. Thanks for the help.
Again, no. This should be very clear due to the very fact that the previous Maelstrom weapon is still in the game as the same weapon therefore the "perfected' maelstrom is a completely new weapon making how Zos handle adjusting existing sets in the game irrelevant and moot to the discussion. Just stating solid facts.
GrumpyDuckling wrote: »GrumpyDuckling wrote: »GrumpyDuckling wrote: »This is a brand new weapon that has never been in the game before so in fact, we have always had to grind to get new gear added to the game so Rich's choice makes absolute sense.As far as I have read, the only reason given to us is they say these weapons are new. I'm skeptical because typically when gear is changed our gear reflects the changes. I suppose that since our previously classified vet arena weapons still exist in the game something had to be called new. The problem for us who have the weapons is that we had vet weapons but now we have normal weapons. While my weapons do not have the bonus, the fact that I ran vet content for them did not change. In my opinion the weapons should have been upgraded.
Here is the announcement thread which is currently 37 pages long with the focus being mainly on customer dissatisfaction. The thread is still open for comments as of this writing.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/521860/
No, what you are saying is wrong -- it does not make "absolute sense" because what you say is easily disproved based on precedent of previous "brand new" sets.
ZOS has introduced new names for sets, new bonuses for sets, and changed sets in ways that had previously never existed before, but (since 2016) they have always done this WITHOUT players needing to re-do the exact same content to receive the updated versions. Not updating existing VMA/VDSA weapons is unprecedented -- it does not make sense with how they have handled sets in the last 3-4 years.
Not at all, The new weapon is not changing sets. It is a new weapon added to the game and nothing I said has been disproven here.
"The new weapon is not changing sets." Excellent, I am glad you agree because then based on the precedent of how ZOS has handled previous sets, then existing VMA/VDSA weapons should be updated. Thanks for the help.
Again, no. This should be very clear due to the very fact that the previous Maelstrom weapon is still in the game as the same weapon therefore the "perfected' maelstrom is a completely new weapon making how Zos handle adjusting existing sets in the game irrelevant and moot to the discussion. Just stating solid facts.
Hmm, so let's use your own logic then... ZOS introduces a "new" weapon that is only acquired via VMA. And the "previous" version of the weapon is only available in normal mode... so... the players who have completed VMA on June 10th are going to own the "previous" version that is only available in normal mode, while the players who have completed VMA on June 11th are going to get the "new" weapon because the creative director says so...
Just stating solid facts.
GrumpyDuckling wrote: »GrumpyDuckling wrote: »GrumpyDuckling wrote: »This is a brand new weapon that has never been in the game before so in fact, we have always had to grind to get new gear added to the game so Rich's choice makes absolute sense.As far as I have read, the only reason given to us is they say these weapons are new. I'm skeptical because typically when gear is changed our gear reflects the changes. I suppose that since our previously classified vet arena weapons still exist in the game something had to be called new. The problem for us who have the weapons is that we had vet weapons but now we have normal weapons. While my weapons do not have the bonus, the fact that I ran vet content for them did not change. In my opinion the weapons should have been upgraded.
Here is the announcement thread which is currently 37 pages long with the focus being mainly on customer dissatisfaction. The thread is still open for comments as of this writing.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/521860/
No, what you are saying is wrong -- it does not make "absolute sense" because what you say is easily disproved based on precedent of previous "brand new" sets.
ZOS has introduced new names for sets, new bonuses for sets, and changed sets in ways that had previously never existed before, but (since 2016) they have always done this WITHOUT players needing to re-do the exact same content to receive the updated versions. Not updating existing VMA/VDSA weapons is unprecedented -- it does not make sense with how they have handled sets in the last 3-4 years.
Not at all, The new weapon is not changing sets. It is a new weapon added to the game and nothing I said has been disproven here.
"The new weapon is not changing sets." Excellent, I am glad you agree because then based on the precedent of how ZOS has handled previous sets, then existing VMA/VDSA weapons should be updated. Thanks for the help.
Again, no. This should be very clear due to the very fact that the previous Maelstrom weapon is still in the game as the same weapon therefore the "perfected' maelstrom is a completely new weapon making how Zos handle adjusting existing sets in the game irrelevant and moot to the discussion. Just stating solid facts.
Hmm, so let's use your own logic then... ZOS introduces a "new" weapon that is only acquired via VMA. And the "previous" version of the weapon is only available in normal mode... so... the players who have completed VMA on June 10th are going to own the "previous" version that is only available in normal mode, while the players who have completed VMA on June 11th are going to get the "new" weapon because the creative director says so...
Just stating solid facts.
What is relevant is that it is a new weapon and you seem to be agreeing on that point here. That is what makes the argument about how Zos handled changes to older sets irrelevant and moot.
I fail to see how this question has anything to do with this new weapon.
As I already explained, it is the essence between linear gear progression vs vertical gear progression, since v16, ESO had only vertical gear progression, that's what made it special compared to other MMOs, while the introduction of perfected arena weapons is linear progression. Same as highering gear cap.
The question is where do they stop pushing linear gear progression. Perfected Monster sets? Higher gear cap when they rework CP? Higher gear cap every update?
I mean, the justification for it is the same one. It is the new 2021 car model. You don't deserve it for free just because u had the 2020 model. It is the same thing they did with vMA weapons. Just on a bigger scale.
And now there are two options.
1. They don't want to introduce linear gear progression into the game, but they are fine with doing it once if it harms only veterans. (Out of ignorance or spite, it doesn't really matter).
2. They want to slowly introduce more linear gear progression.
What scares me is 2. And I am for the last month trying really hard to make sure the community understand that this is the problem, and raise their voices against it.
The progression in the game since the last time Zos increased the level cap (now the gear cap) and since Zos froze the CP cap has not changed. There is absolutely nothing in this last update that suggests a change. We can speculate all we want about what might happen but the vMA weapon offers no basis for that.
Heck, many players have been asking for perfected versions of Master and Maelstrom weapon and now that have them we are seeking all manners to complain that we have them.
GrumpyDuckling wrote: »GrumpyDuckling wrote: »This is a brand new weapon that has never been in the game before so in fact, we have always had to grind to get new gear added to the game so Rich's choice makes absolute sense.As far as I have read, the only reason given to us is they say these weapons are new. I'm skeptical because typically when gear is changed our gear reflects the changes. I suppose that since our previously classified vet arena weapons still exist in the game something had to be called new. The problem for us who have the weapons is that we had vet weapons but now we have normal weapons. While my weapons do not have the bonus, the fact that I ran vet content for them did not change. In my opinion the weapons should have been upgraded.
Here is the announcement thread which is currently 37 pages long with the focus being mainly on customer dissatisfaction. The thread is still open for comments as of this writing.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/521860/
No, what you are saying is wrong -- it does not make "absolute sense" because what you say is easily disproved based on precedent of previous "brand new" sets.
ZOS has introduced new names for sets, new bonuses for sets, and changed sets in ways that had previously never existed before, but (since 2016) they have always done this WITHOUT players needing to re-do the exact same content to receive the updated versions. Not updating existing VMA/VDSA weapons is unprecedented -- it does not make sense with how they have handled sets in the last 3-4 years.
Not at all, The new weapon is not changing sets. It is a new weapon added to the game and nothing I said has been disproven here.
"The new weapon is not changing sets." Excellent, I am glad you agree because then based on the precedent of how ZOS has handled previous sets, then existing VMA/VDSA weapons should be updated. Thanks for the help.
Again, no. This should be very clear due to the very fact that the previous Maelstrom weapon is still in the game as the same weapon therefore the "perfected' maelstrom is a completely new weapon making how Zos handle adjusting existing sets in the game irrelevant and moot to the discussion. Just stating solid facts.
GrumpyDuckling wrote: »GrumpyDuckling wrote: »This is a brand new weapon that has never been in the game before so in fact, we have always had to grind to get new gear added to the game so Rich's choice makes absolute sense.As far as I have read, the only reason given to us is they say these weapons are new. I'm skeptical because typically when gear is changed our gear reflects the changes. I suppose that since our previously classified vet arena weapons still exist in the game something had to be called new. The problem for us who have the weapons is that we had vet weapons but now we have normal weapons. While my weapons do not have the bonus, the fact that I ran vet content for them did not change. In my opinion the weapons should have been upgraded.
Here is the announcement thread which is currently 37 pages long with the focus being mainly on customer dissatisfaction. The thread is still open for comments as of this writing.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/521860/
No, what you are saying is wrong -- it does not make "absolute sense" because what you say is easily disproved based on precedent of previous "brand new" sets.
ZOS has introduced new names for sets, new bonuses for sets, and changed sets in ways that had previously never existed before, but (since 2016) they have always done this WITHOUT players needing to re-do the exact same content to receive the updated versions. Not updating existing VMA/VDSA weapons is unprecedented -- it does not make sense with how they have handled sets in the last 3-4 years.
Not at all, The new weapon is not changing sets. It is a new weapon added to the game and nothing I said has been disproven here.
"The new weapon is not changing sets." Excellent, I am glad you agree because then based on the precedent of how ZOS has handled previous sets, then existing VMA/VDSA weapons should be updated. Thanks for the help.
Again, no. This should be very clear due to the very fact that the previous Maelstrom weapon is still in the game as the same weapon therefore the "perfected' maelstrom is a completely new weapon making how Zos handle adjusting existing sets in the game irrelevant and moot to the discussion. Just stating solid facts.
Slapping a new bonus line on it and renaming it doesn't make something a new weapon (as can be seen patch after patch after patch, including U26 with the perfected asylum destro which had an added bonus line that didn't previously exist).
The vMA weapon was the reward for beating vet.
Slapping a new bonus line on it and renaming it doesn't make something a new weapon (as can be seen patch after patch after patch, including U26 with the perfected asylum destro which had an added bonus line that didn't previously exist).
This time, it did, as can be seen by the fact that the old weapon is still around.The vMA weapon was the reward for beating vet.
Yes, and people got that weapon for beating Vet. That was the reward for doing the content, and they get to keep it.
Look, you might not like it, but there were multiple decisions that could have been taken here, and ZOS chose one of them. That is actually the end of the story. This battle is over. You can continue to talk about it, but I think you are wasting your time.
In the end, you are either going to continue playing, or take your marbles to some other game. That is your choice.
GrumpyDuckling wrote: »GrumpyDuckling wrote: »GrumpyDuckling wrote: »GrumpyDuckling wrote: »This is a brand new weapon that has never been in the game before so in fact, we have always had to grind to get new gear added to the game so Rich's choice makes absolute sense.As far as I have read, the only reason given to us is they say these weapons are new. I'm skeptical because typically when gear is changed our gear reflects the changes. I suppose that since our previously classified vet arena weapons still exist in the game something had to be called new. The problem for us who have the weapons is that we had vet weapons but now we have normal weapons. While my weapons do not have the bonus, the fact that I ran vet content for them did not change. In my opinion the weapons should have been upgraded.
Here is the announcement thread which is currently 37 pages long with the focus being mainly on customer dissatisfaction. The thread is still open for comments as of this writing.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/521860/
No, what you are saying is wrong -- it does not make "absolute sense" because what you say is easily disproved based on precedent of previous "brand new" sets.
ZOS has introduced new names for sets, new bonuses for sets, and changed sets in ways that had previously never existed before, but (since 2016) they have always done this WITHOUT players needing to re-do the exact same content to receive the updated versions. Not updating existing VMA/VDSA weapons is unprecedented -- it does not make sense with how they have handled sets in the last 3-4 years.
Not at all, The new weapon is not changing sets. It is a new weapon added to the game and nothing I said has been disproven here.
"The new weapon is not changing sets." Excellent, I am glad you agree because then based on the precedent of how ZOS has handled previous sets, then existing VMA/VDSA weapons should be updated. Thanks for the help.
Again, no. This should be very clear due to the very fact that the previous Maelstrom weapon is still in the game as the same weapon therefore the "perfected' maelstrom is a completely new weapon making how Zos handle adjusting existing sets in the game irrelevant and moot to the discussion. Just stating solid facts.
Hmm, so let's use your own logic then... ZOS introduces a "new" weapon that is only acquired via VMA. And the "previous" version of the weapon is only available in normal mode... so... the players who have completed VMA on June 10th are going to own the "previous" version that is only available in normal mode, while the players who have completed VMA on June 11th are going to get the "new" weapon because the creative director says so...
Just stating solid facts.
What is relevant is that it is a new weapon and you seem to be agreeing on that point here. That is what makes the argument about how Zos handled changes to older sets irrelevant and moot.
No, it is clear that I am not agreeing with you. Just showing you how your attempted logic works against you (hence the "let's use your own logic then" statement).
The changes to older sets are not irrelevant and moot. Do you think we should all have to re-farm Amber Plasm if we want the "new" bonus of health recovery?
Yes, THIS time. Which is a new direction for the team to take and one that most players don't like. We can absolutely keep voicing our opinion on the matter. This decision might be a done deal, as you say, but that doesn't mean we can't make it well known that we don't want them to continue down this route of decision making.
"Suck it up or leave" aren't the only two options. If you want to implement change, you speak up.