KillsAllElves wrote: »Bad players will always be bad unless they learn to play and develop better skill. This game is an oxymoron when it comes to its classes and players make it worse!
Sorcerer was designed initially with the intent as the ranged caster class with emphasis on >>>range<<<...
Im not reading your statement. And the players who voted yes on the poll are bad overland questers.
Every class has something missing. Sorc, THE spellcaster class, having to rely on a magic-imbued staff is very thematically fitting.
I see your point and you have an argument, but , there should be more work done on other spamables to see how they work with other classes first before doing something like this. Mages fury should have a more a diverse morph option than get more "magicka or aoe damage" though. I think one should cause minor vulnerability or minor maim instead of damage on cast, only providing the execute damage if their health is on execute range.
I play mag sorc and would not want to be steered towards a spamables. Really, there should be a rework on "spammables"
Rebirthment wrote: »Every class has something missing. Sorc, THE spellcaster class, having to rely on a magic-imbued staff is very thematically fitting.
And they would still use a magic staff at least magsorcs will. Stamsorcs even now don't use staves because of game mechanics but thematically stamsorcs imo are are still sorcerers but those who fight in melee like your typical spellsword. Not all magic users use a staff you know.
KillsAllElves wrote: »Rebirthment wrote: »Every class has something missing. Sorc, THE spellcaster class, having to rely on a magic-imbued staff is very thematically fitting.
And they would still use a magic staff at least magsorcs will. Stamsorcs even now don't use staves because of game mechanics but thematically stamsorcs imo are are still sorcerers but those who fight in melee like your typical spellsword. Not all magic users use a staff you know.
Easy, players wanting spammables are usually the one crying for melee ranged abilties because they are bad at countering ranged fighters! Like i said before - bad players will always be bad. If you want spammables because player skill is lacking play a bumplar.
Stam sorcerer is a brawler no way around that.
fastolfv_ESO wrote: »they need to make frags go back to the way it was to make it worth it, if not yes we need a spammable, i mean ffs nbs have 3 with op bonus effects attatched to em so why cant the class called the sorcerer have something as basic as a spammable mag ability
Crystal Frags is kinda sorta the spammable. If you do your rotation enough it procs fairly often.
Indoril_Nerevar wrote: »They have great passives though.
i still don't see what's wrong with relying on weapon abilities on a build...
saying this as a stam sorc who relies on flurry as a spammable