ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »

code65536 wrote: »

The last time there was a leak of patch notes, ZOS claimed that they were fake, yet they turned out to be accurate. So we are understandably skeptical of any claim that the latest leak is "fake", and the points brought up in this overview seems to suggest that ZOS may be lying yet again with these claims that they are "fake".

The patch notes haven't been sent to anyone to leak out. Anything you're seeing that discuss them are fake, because nobody except me has them currently.

You should leak them to us Gina.

Too many grammar errors in those fake patch notes, Gina would never allow that.

When will you do another skill lines for mages (Weapons). They have just 1 instead 3 for stamina. I like in Skyrim it was like schools of destruction and so on...
I hope in future DLC we will go in Winterhold College when we get new skill lines and at last PvP will be balanced.

What about the NB class identity update?

susmitds wrote: »

What about the NB class identity update?

NB identity is to remain invisible. I'd argue that their identity has never been more fulfilled lol.

Trying to fix server performance by "fixing" how skills work seems great and all but it doesn't really address the core issue, the SERVER. There has to be a point where someone in charge says "Ya know what, lets improve these servers" instead of these constant band aid fixes to skills and passives and sets etc.

[removed quote]

[removed for misinformation]

Instead of shutting players out of the process and forcing certain players under an nda for this type of thing that should be for the entire player base to help out on. This shows they only are wanting to go so far with it. They want to do it themselves and want to do what they want to do instead of listening to feed back or looking for it they do it in a passive manner that really isn't beneficial at all. The communication is a big issue still on the combat part and passives part. They need to be more hands on and more active on the forums on these issues.. I do think they fear players abusing things to the point content they made not to be easy is made easy I think this is the prime focus on their part in some of the changes that the do. Performance is a big thing this time because they have not choice if they want to keep the game running for many many years to come they know that. So they are working on it and making these changes to fix that problem they are having with it. The good thing is they are keeping players in the loop on this issue. Even if its not with the combat they are with the performance. With the combat I think the main issue is trying to not upset the community in some cases but not always since it does seem to upset the community when they do something major that really hurts their ingame builds.

What should be under Nda, Storyline content dlc content, other stuff like that. Combat not so much that shouldn't be fully under Nda protection unless its a new skilline or class then I understand it for that reason.

Combat should be openly discussed. Where they take our feed back communicate on that feed back and try to see what can be done about issues openly and not behind closed doors. Threads like this one should be placed more often here and also where they place in changes like what they want to reduce or nerf or even fix or buff. Players should be able to give feed back up to a point for a limited time in a constructive manner then they close the thread and make another for another issue. They don't need to do this for everything just the big stuff that would be very important for them to discus stuff with us about.

Say like important abilties player need to use for their builds and the Changes they want to do with them and the reasons why. Like for example the changes to healing springs like you can only have one of them that happened during one of the patches that would have been something they could have openly communicated with the player base on before official release on any patch notes or making their minds on it. Stuff like that will help build up trust and make the community better along with the game everyone won't get what they want of course but at least they would know before they make these decisions what the player bases mind is on it. That is what I hope they will at least do in the future. Interact with their player base get to know their player base give feed back of their own on certain things. Telling them no that isn't feasible or yes that is something we can look into. That is the type of communication that should be applied here.

hobicabobjob wrote: »

ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »

Hello all!
Block is an ability that everyone can use at any time, which means it can create a lot of traffic for the server to handle.

Can we just disable block in Cyrodiil please?

You want to randomly die before your character even registers the damage?
Bombers would absolutely love this.

Starlock wrote: »

Some thoughts:

• You mention abilities will still fire when block cancelled. Is changing this something you now have the ability to do? That abilities still fire when block cancelled is easily the most bizarre thing to me about this game. I understand some players consider it a mainstay, but I for one wouldn't shed any tears if it went away entirely. Perhaps something best reserved for an ESO2 if that's on the horizon as there'd be less of a whinefest to do this in a new game.

ESO would be too slow for its fast paced combat. Block Cancel at some point became a "Skill Ceiling" and it is even taught in tutorials. Removing this would just make pvp even more dull.