Update 49 is now available for testing on the PTS! You can read the latest patch notes here: https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/categories/pts
Maintenance for the week of January 19:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – January 19
• NA megaservers for patch maintenance – January 21, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 10:00AM EST (15:00 UTC)
• EU megaservers for patch maintenance – January 21, 9:00 UTC (4:00AM EST) - 15:00 UTC (10:00AM EST)
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – January 19
• NA megaservers for patch maintenance – January 21, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 10:00AM EST (15:00 UTC)
• EU megaservers for patch maintenance – January 21, 9:00 UTC (4:00AM EST) - 15:00 UTC (10:00AM EST)
We will be performing maintenance for patch 11.3.1 on the PTS on Tuesday at 10:00AM EST (15:00 UTC).
For Devs about Blood spawn.
-
6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.Edited by OrderoftheDarkness on October 29, 2019 3:46PM0 -
TriangularChicken✭✭✭✭OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok2 -
TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?Edited by OrderoftheDarkness on October 29, 2019 4:02PM0 -
The Uninvited✭✭✭✭✭
✭OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.Pandora's Promise (rip) | LND | Pactriotic | IKnowWhatUDidLastWinter's | The Uninvited |
Ride the paranoia | All life is pain | Only the grave is real4 -
The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
Why is this topic bothering you then? I thought you were happy with the other set. ^^
Edited by OrderoftheDarkness on October 29, 2019 5:19PM0 -
The Uninvited✭✭✭✭✭
✭OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
Why is this topic bothering you then? I thought you were happy with the other set. ^^
I never said the topic was bothering me? I am just telling you that the difference in ultimate regeneration is barely noticeable, therefore it doesn't need an adjustment.Pandora's Promise (rip) | LND | Pactriotic | IKnowWhatUDidLastWinter's | The Uninvited |
Ride the paranoia | All life is pain | Only the grave is real1 -
The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
Why is this topic bothering you then? I thought you were happy with the other set. ^^
I never said the topic was bothering me? I am just telling you that the difference in ultimate regeneration is barely noticeable, therefore it doesn't need an adjustment.
When using ult 75 cost there is no difference, I agree.0 -
The Uninvited✭✭✭✭✭
✭OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
Why is this topic bothering you then? I thought you were happy with the other set. ^^
I never said the topic was bothering me? I am just telling you that the difference in ultimate regeneration is barely noticeable, therefore it doesn't need an adjustment.
When using ult 75 cost there is no difference, I agree.
I play a magicka DK, think again.Pandora's Promise (rip) | LND | Pactriotic | IKnowWhatUDidLastWinter's | The Uninvited |
Ride the paranoia | All life is pain | Only the grave is real1 -
The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
Why is this topic bothering you then? I thought you were happy with the other set. ^^
I never said the topic was bothering me? I am just telling you that the difference in ultimate regeneration is barely noticeable, therefore it doesn't need an adjustment.
When using ult 75 cost there is no difference, I agree.
I play a magicka DK, think again.The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
Why is this topic bothering you then? I thought you were happy with the other set. ^^
I never said the topic was bothering me? I am just telling you that the difference in ultimate regeneration is barely noticeable, therefore it doesn't need an adjustment.
When using ult 75 cost there is no difference, I agree.
I play a magicka DK, think again.
I managed to think. You like more to jump 1 times than two times.0 -
The Uninvited✭✭✭✭✭
✭OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
Why is this topic bothering you then? I thought you were happy with the other set. ^^
I never said the topic was bothering me? I am just telling you that the difference in ultimate regeneration is barely noticeable, therefore it doesn't need an adjustment.
When using ult 75 cost there is no difference, I agree.
I play a magicka DK, think again.The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
Why is this topic bothering you then? I thought you were happy with the other set. ^^
I never said the topic was bothering me? I am just telling you that the difference in ultimate regeneration is barely noticeable, therefore it doesn't need an adjustment.
When using ult 75 cost there is no difference, I agree.
I play a magicka DK, think again.
I managed to think. You like more to jump 1 times than two times.
And you like to talk more than you listen, let alone think. I'm done here, have fun fighting the rest of the forum!Pandora's Promise (rip) | LND | Pactriotic | IKnowWhatUDidLastWinter's | The Uninvited |
Ride the paranoia | All life is pain | Only the grave is real5 -
The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
Why is this topic bothering you then? I thought you were happy with the other set. ^^
I never said the topic was bothering me? I am just telling you that the difference in ultimate regeneration is barely noticeable, therefore it doesn't need an adjustment.
When using ult 75 cost there is no difference, I agree.
I play a magicka DK, think again.The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
Why is this topic bothering you then? I thought you were happy with the other set. ^^
I never said the topic was bothering me? I am just telling you that the difference in ultimate regeneration is barely noticeable, therefore it doesn't need an adjustment.
When using ult 75 cost there is no difference, I agree.
I play a magicka DK, think again.
I managed to think. You like more to jump 1 times than two times.
And you like to talk more than you listen, let alone think. I'm done here, have fun fighting the rest of the forum!
I believe you have decided so. When writing this topic I probably had no experience using. According to you, we can simply give each monster set +14 ult every 6 seconds from any source of damage + 6% chance.Edited by OrderoftheDarkness on October 29, 2019 5:38PM1 -
The Uninvited✭✭✭✭✭
✭OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
Why is this topic bothering you then? I thought you were happy with the other set. ^^
I never said the topic was bothering me? I am just telling you that the difference in ultimate regeneration is barely noticeable, therefore it doesn't need an adjustment.
When using ult 75 cost there is no difference, I agree.
I play a magicka DK, think again.The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
Why is this topic bothering you then? I thought you were happy with the other set. ^^
I never said the topic was bothering me? I am just telling you that the difference in ultimate regeneration is barely noticeable, therefore it doesn't need an adjustment.
When using ult 75 cost there is no difference, I agree.
I play a magicka DK, think again.
I managed to think. You like more to jump 1 times than two times.
And you like to talk more than you listen, let alone think. I'm done here, have fun fighting the rest of the forum!
I believe you have decided so. When writing this topic I probably had no experience using. According to you, we can simply give each monster set +14 ult every 6 seconds from any source of damage.
You could, and it wouldn't make a lot of difference.
But you're putting words in my mouth here, as I have never claimed what you are insinuating. I merely stated the fact that the ulti generation doesn't have such a big impact compared to not having it.Pandora's Promise (rip) | LND | Pactriotic | IKnowWhatUDidLastWinter's | The Uninvited |
Ride the paranoia | All life is pain | Only the grave is real2 -
The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
Why is this topic bothering you then? I thought you were happy with the other set. ^^
I never said the topic was bothering me? I am just telling you that the difference in ultimate regeneration is barely noticeable, therefore it doesn't need an adjustment.
When using ult 75 cost there is no difference, I agree.
I play a magicka DK, think again.The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
Why is this topic bothering you then? I thought you were happy with the other set. ^^
I never said the topic was bothering me? I am just telling you that the difference in ultimate regeneration is barely noticeable, therefore it doesn't need an adjustment.
When using ult 75 cost there is no difference, I agree.
I play a magicka DK, think again.
I managed to think. You like more to jump 1 times than two times.
And you like to talk more than you listen, let alone think. I'm done here, have fun fighting the rest of the forum!
I believe you have decided so. When writing this topic I probably had no experience using. According to you, we can simply give each monster set +14 ult every 6 seconds from any source of damage.
You could, and it wouldn't make a lot of difference.
But you're putting words in my mouth here, as I have never claimed what you are insinuating. I merely stated the fact that the ulti generation doesn't have such a big impact compared to not having it.
I don't think that's a fact. I'm just wondering why you stopped using BS on magicka dk. Maybe tired of looking at 129 stamina recovery?Edited by OrderoftheDarkness on October 29, 2019 5:40PM0 -
The Uninvited✭✭✭✭✭
✭OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
Why is this topic bothering you then? I thought you were happy with the other set. ^^
I never said the topic was bothering me? I am just telling you that the difference in ultimate regeneration is barely noticeable, therefore it doesn't need an adjustment.
When using ult 75 cost there is no difference, I agree.
I play a magicka DK, think again.The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
Why is this topic bothering you then? I thought you were happy with the other set. ^^
I never said the topic was bothering me? I am just telling you that the difference in ultimate regeneration is barely noticeable, therefore it doesn't need an adjustment.
When using ult 75 cost there is no difference, I agree.
I play a magicka DK, think again.
I managed to think. You like more to jump 1 times than two times.
And you like to talk more than you listen, let alone think. I'm done here, have fun fighting the rest of the forum!
I believe you have decided so. When writing this topic I probably had no experience using. According to you, we can simply give each monster set +14 ult every 6 seconds from any source of damage.
You could, and it wouldn't make a lot of difference.
But you're putting words in my mouth here, as I have never claimed what you are insinuating. I merely stated the fact that the ulti generation doesn't have such a big impact compared to not having it.
I don't think that's a fact
I'm just wondering why you stopped using BS on magicka dk. Maybe tired of looking at 129 stamina recovery?
Nope, mostly used it for the resistance boost, which I have found other ways to work around.Pandora's Promise (rip) | LND | Pactriotic | IKnowWhatUDidLastWinter's | The Uninvited |
Ride the paranoia | All life is pain | Only the grave is real1 -
The Uninvited✭✭✭✭✭
✭And before you say it, no I'm not using Chudan or Fortified Brass either.Pandora's Promise (rip) | LND | Pactriotic | IKnowWhatUDidLastWinter's | The Uninvited |
Ride the paranoia | All life is pain | Only the grave is real0 -
The Uninvited wrote: »And before you say it, no I'm not using Chudan or Fortified Brass either.
I didn't even think about it. Wanted to say, you can simply take Nord ^^. Well you came and solved the question of this whole topic, what do you think is no difference.Edited by OrderoftheDarkness on October 29, 2019 5:49PM0 -
The Uninvited✭✭✭✭✭
✭OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »And before you say it, no I'm not using Chudan or Fortified Brass either.
I didn't even think about it. Wanted to say, you simply take Nord ^^. Well you came and solved the question of this whole topic, what do you think is no difference.
Nord? Dunmer for life here, again you're drawing conclusions without listening.Pandora's Promise (rip) | LND | Pactriotic | IKnowWhatUDidLastWinter's | The Uninvited |
Ride the paranoia | All life is pain | Only the grave is real3 -
The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »And before you say it, no I'm not using Chudan or Fortified Brass either.
I didn't even think about it. Wanted to say, you simply take Nord ^^. Well you came and solved the question of this whole topic, what do you think is no difference.
Nord? Dunmer for life here, again you're drawing conclusions without listening.
I assumed and did not indicate. You are not tired of telling me what I am doing and what I am not doing.0 -
I understand you this does not mean that I will stop thinking about a large number of ult gen. These are just words on the forum, developers still do their own thing and I respect all their decisions.0
-
The Uninvited✭✭✭✭✭
✭I am not telling you what you are doing or not doing. I am basing my statements purely on what you did write, not what you didn't. Unlike you.Pandora's Promise (rip) | LND | Pactriotic | IKnowWhatUDidLastWinter's | The Uninvited |
Ride the paranoia | All life is pain | Only the grave is real0 -
The Uninvited✭✭✭✭✭
✭OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »I understand you this does not mean that I will stop thinking about a large number of ult gen. These are just words on the forum, developers still do their own thing and I respect all their decisions.
Another thing we can disagree on. Granted, developers will do their own thing but I, for one, won't respect all their decisions. Most of them, but not all.Pandora's Promise (rip) | LND | Pactriotic | IKnowWhatUDidLastWinter's | The Uninvited |
Ride the paranoia | All life is pain | Only the grave is real0 -
The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »I understand you this does not mean that I will stop thinking about a large number of ult gen. These are just words on the forum, developers still do their own thing and I respect all their decisions.
Another thing we can disagree on. Granted, developers will do their own thing but I, for one, won't respect all their decisions. Most of them, but not all.
I did not tell you to respect. Unlike you. How can I listen to my suggestion about Nord. If you are guided by what I wrote. Actually, the topic header says For devs. I do not forbid you to write. I am only guided by what you have written.Edited by OrderoftheDarkness on October 29, 2019 6:13PM0 -
The Uninvited✭✭✭✭✭
✭OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »I understand you this does not mean that I will stop thinking about a large number of ult gen. These are just words on the forum, developers still do their own thing and I respect all their decisions.
Another thing we can disagree on. Granted, developers will do their own thing but I, for one, won't respect all their decisions. Most of them, but not all.
I did not tell you to respect. Unlike you. How can I listen to my suggestion about Nord.
LOL, this is getting awful on your end now. I did not tell you to respect either, so the "Unlike you" was totally unwarranted for in this case. Trying to use my own words against me in the wrong way? How old are you even?Pandora's Promise (rip) | LND | Pactriotic | IKnowWhatUDidLastWinter's | The Uninvited |
Ride the paranoia | All life is pain | Only the grave is real1 -
The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »I understand you this does not mean that I will stop thinking about a large number of ult gen. These are just words on the forum, developers still do their own thing and I respect all their decisions.
Another thing we can disagree on. Granted, developers will do their own thing but I, for one, won't respect all their decisions. Most of them, but not all.
I did not tell you to respect. Unlike you. How can I listen to my suggestion about Nord.
How old are you even?
I was just waiting for this, thanks.
0 -
The Uninvited✭✭✭✭✭
✭OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »I understand you this does not mean that I will stop thinking about a large number of ult gen. These are just words on the forum, developers still do their own thing and I respect all their decisions.
Another thing we can disagree on. Granted, developers will do their own thing but I, for one, won't respect all their decisions. Most of them, but not all.
I did not tell you to respect. Unlike you. How can I listen to my suggestion about Nord.
How old are you even?
I was just waiting for this, thanks.
Well, you asked for it. Not directly, but you did anyway.Pandora's Promise (rip) | LND | Pactriotic | IKnowWhatUDidLastWinter's | The Uninvited |
Ride the paranoia | All life is pain | Only the grave is real0 -
p00tx✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.
Nonononono. One last time, for the kids in the back who didn't hear the first time...NO.
You do NOT make other sets more attractive by nerfing a well-functioning set into trash. That's like someone wanting to be taller, so they suggest cutting off the legs of all tall people below the knees. That is seriously the most twisted logic I've ever seen. This (Bloodspawn) is what a monster set should look like, and it should be used as a template for other useful sets. The rest of them have been slowly ground into garbage now, barring a few that managed to escape the whine train and the resultant nerf hammer. People have got to start thinking of the widespread ramifications of their suggestions before throwing them out there for the obviously befuddled combat devs to potentially see. Those guys are obviously not firing on all cylinders, and now you're just feeding them more bad ideas.Edited by p00tx on October 29, 2019 10:19PMPC/Xbox NA
Unchained | Unstoppable | Mindmender | Swashbuckler Supreme | Planes Breaker | Dawnbringer | Godslayer | Immortal Redeemer | Gryphon Heart | Tick-tock Tormentor | Dro-m'Athra Destroyer | Stormproof | Grand Overlord | Grand Mastercrafter | Master Grappler | Tamriel Hero5 -
maxjapank✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
If it’s barely noticeable to you, then lowering the Ulti regen some should be okay with you.1 -
The Uninvited✭✭✭✭✭
✭The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
If it’s barely noticeable to you, then lowering the Ulti regen some should be okay with you.
No. But buffing other sets nobody barely uses would be okay with me.
@p00tx You know what's up, couldn't have said it better myself.Pandora's Promise (rip) | LND | Pactriotic | IKnowWhatUDidLastWinter's | The Uninvited |
Ride the paranoia | All life is pain | Only the grave is real1 -
maxjapank✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭The Uninvited wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »TriangularChicken wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Nonsense different from nonsensical. Although my English is bad.
It means the same to say "the facts are nonsense" as "the facts are nonsensical". It is slightly more precise to say nonsensical rather than nonsense, from a certain point of view facts cannot be nonsense, but may share characteristics with nonsense, such as defying reason or logic. My point was you described what he had posted as facts, I think you meant to say they are opinions.
So you don't like Bloodspawn, but you do like the nerfs to DOTs? You want defense and offense both nerfed?
I understood you, I corrected.
I use Blood spawn myself. I think the quick accumulation of Ult is what prevents people from using the other kits they want to try. Better to use 2 times the ult than once correctly? I do not want a complete nerf to this good set, my idea was to reduce the recovery points of Ult gen.OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »6% chance to proc every 6 seconds sure if it always procs off cooldown it could be extremely strong. Now let’s consider they reduce the ultimate it grants or remove it entirely what then people will just run balorgh and 2h asylum and damage will skyrocket. Asylum 2h grants up to 15 ultimate on perfected and has no cooldown. Before you ask for a nerf to bloodspawn consider the ramifications and how players will adapt.
Good version. To be honest I'm not asking for a nerf, I just shared my observation.
If they reduce reg this set will also remain one of the best for StamDK, just the number of people will become less who use it to hit the ult 2 times in one cycle.
I against the removal of ult reg.
ok
Yes there is no difference reduce or removal... You like to joke? Let's have fun.
See how many views this topic has and how many people spoke out are all BS players. Ahahaha, I'm probably right about the BS! Fun huh?
I'll tell you a joke. I have been using Bloodspawn for over 2 years and recently (3 months ago) switched to a different monster set. The difference in ultimate generation is barely noticeable.
If it’s barely noticeable to you, then lowering the Ulti regen some should be okay with you.
No. But buffing other sets nobody barely uses would be okay with me.
@p00tx You know what's up, couldn't have said it better myself.
I’m all for buffing other sets. But there is a reason Bloodspawn has been the number 1 monster for Stamina users, and it wasn’t for the mitigation. The Ulti regen is just a bit too much.0
