I think he google translated a nerf bloodspawn thread. True, one of the most OP monster sets in pvp but there are definitely multiple builds you would run something else over bloodspawn. Also, it really isn’t that strong in PVE.
OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »I shouldn't be pointing to these things with your competence, but you haven't thought that restoring 14 points of absolute ability is a big number. Taking into account the fact that already in general form there is an alignment of sets, of spells, etc
OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »I shouldn't be pointing to these things with your competence, but you haven't thought that restoring 14 points of absolute ability is a big number. Taking into account the fact that already in general form there is an alignment of sets, of spells, etc
TriangularChicken wrote: »somebody got 1vXed by a bloodspawn user
OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »How many people so much and opinion. In my experience, sometimes OP limits the potential of other things. Therefore, a nerf is a kind of buff. You see what the difference is, I proposed a concrete proposal and you just have a lyrical digression.
I repeat, fourteen is a very large number. Reducing this number will not hit the BS as a whole.
P. S.I think you first need to make an offer as possible to buff other sets and at what scale even if your offer is ignored, but I agree with you I'd like to see buff other sets.
OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »How many people so much and opinion. In my experience, sometimes OP limits the potential of other things. Therefore, a nerf is a kind of buff. You see what the difference is, I proposed a concrete proposal and you just have a lyrical digression.
I repeat, fourteen is a very large number. Reducing this number will not hit the BS as a whole.
P. S.I think you first need to make an offer as possible to buff other sets and at what scale even if your offer is ignored, but I agree with you I'd like to see buff other sets.
it used to be 25, so it's already gotten hit with a nerf. go any lower and it'd just be the Nord racial passive. please stop before you jam your foot even further into your mouth. Your post is bad, your idea is bad, and ZOS shouldn't be given any more ideas given their current nerf-happy state of things.
OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »How many people so much and opinion. In my experience, sometimes OP limits the potential of other things. Therefore, a nerf is a kind of buff. You see what the difference is, I proposed a concrete proposal and you just have a lyrical digression.
I repeat, fourteen is a very large number. Reducing this number will not hit the BS as a whole.
P. S.I think you first need to make an offer as possible to buff other sets and at what scale even if your offer is ignored, but I agree with you I'd like to see buff other sets.
OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »I shouldn't be pointing to these things with your competence, but you haven't thought that restoring 14 points of absolute ability is a big number. Taking into account the fact that already in general form there is an alignment of sets, of spells, etc
LiquidPony wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »How many people so much and opinion. In my experience, sometimes OP limits the potential of other things. Therefore, a nerf is a kind of buff. You see what the difference is, I proposed a concrete proposal and you just have a lyrical digression.
I repeat, fourteen is a very large number. Reducing this number will not hit the BS as a whole.
P. S.I think you first need to make an offer as possible to buff other sets and at what scale even if your offer is ignored, but I agree with you I'd like to see buff other sets.
Word salad.
OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The fact that you write there, I have not heard such nonsense for a long time
Urzigurumash wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »The fact that you write there, I have not heard such nonsense for a long time
So you agree with him that the facts are nonsensical