I'd like to talk just for a bit about why it is so important to protect the guilty. Many people in this game do not cheat but have been trolled and victimized by those who have through whispers and zone trolling, etc. Many people have been called names for suspecting the cheaters and exploiters, and now many of us know that we were indeed not crazy but accurate in our suspicions.
My question is why do we find it necessary to allow those who have cheated and exploited to maintain their fake "honor" or their ability to maintain, "I'm just a good player" crap? I get it that we don't name and shame in this game, but keeping things completely hidden cannot possibly help in changing the current climate. Don't name people necessarily by real names, but these are pretend names. Why not have a wall of shame for those pretend names? Why protect the victimizers?
[snip]
[Edit for bait.]
Because 99% of the time, they are actually good players. Everytime a 1vXer or small scale group wipes a zerg, they are automatically assumed to be cheaters. I have been both sides of the fence, so I know.
Everytime I see in zone chat about a said cheater in say, Alessia LM or Ash farm, when I go and check it, it turns out to be a well-known 1vXer or streamer or a troll tank. When I fight them, usually it ends up in a stalemate and we walk away after exchanging blows for a few minutes. Otherwise, one of us dies after a prolonged fight or in a way, that I know for a fact that it is legit.
On the other hand, when I get a jump on a bunch of players, running bad builds, and get away with killing ten of them, you should see the whispers I get calling my things including hacker/cheater/exploiter, etc. After all, it is easier to call someone a cheater than get good both at playing and at theorycrafting OP builds.
Jayman1000 wrote: »I'd like to talk just for a bit about why it is so important to protect the guilty. Many people in this game do not cheat but have been trolled and victimized by those who have through whispers and zone trolling, etc. Many people have been called names for suspecting the cheaters and exploiters, and now many of us know that we were indeed not crazy but accurate in our suspicions.
My question is why do we find it necessary to allow those who have cheated and exploited to maintain their fake "honor" or their ability to maintain, "I'm just a good player" crap? I get it that we don't name and shame in this game, but keeping things completely hidden cannot possibly help in changing the current climate. Don't name people necessarily by real names, but these are pretend names. Why not have a wall of shame for those pretend names? Why protect the victimizers?
This is akin to people who claim to be war heroes but have never even served in the military.
There's a very short and obvious answer here: It's not about protecting the guilty, it's about protecting the innocent.
Cheaters are paying customers, too.
Jayman1000 wrote: »I'd like to talk just for a bit about why it is so important to protect the guilty. Many people in this game do not cheat but have been trolled and victimized by those who have through whispers and zone trolling, etc. Many people have been called names for suspecting the cheaters and exploiters, and now many of us know that we were indeed not crazy but accurate in our suspicions.
My question is why do we find it necessary to allow those who have cheated and exploited to maintain their fake "honor" or their ability to maintain, "I'm just a good player" crap? I get it that we don't name and shame in this game, but keeping things completely hidden cannot possibly help in changing the current climate. Don't name people necessarily by real names, but these are pretend names. Why not have a wall of shame for those pretend names? Why protect the victimizers?
This is akin to people who claim to be war heroes but have never even served in the military.
There's a very short and obvious answer here: It's not about protecting the guilty, it's about protecting the innocent.
No, it isn't protecting the innocent. When someone has been banned by ZOS and proven guilty, they should be stopped from maintaining and procuring more ability of "I'm just a good player." Just post their character name only. The more things are in the shadows, the more bad things proliferate.
Real cheaters caught by ZOS should have their names and punishments revealed in a public wall of shame. Half of the problems in a society are because lack of accountability.
Real cheaters caught by ZOS should have their names and punishments revealed in a public wall of shame. Half of the problems in a society are because lack of accountability.
What good would that do?
There is a player who has had at least 3 accounts permanently banned, according to the player's YouTube videos with screen shots of the account action e-mail from ZoS. New account, new name.
Publishing "Player [X] has been banned for cheating" won't help you at all if Player [X] is back the next day as Player [Y].
My question is why do we find it necessary to allow those who have cheated and exploited to maintain their fake "honor" or their ability to maintain, "I'm just a good player" crap? I get it that we don't name and shame in this game, but keeping things completely hidden cannot possibly help in changing the current climate. Don't name people necessarily by real names, but these are pretend names. Why not have a wall of shame for those pretend names? Why protect the victimizers?
I'm not talking about the people who haven't been confirmed as people cheating by ZOS. We all know the tendency of some people to claiming cheating when they lose, but those who HAVE been banned for it … I don't think it should remain in the shadows.
lordrichter wrote: »My question is why do we find it necessary to allow those who have cheated and exploited to maintain their fake "honor" or their ability to maintain, "I'm just a good player" crap? I get it that we don't name and shame in this game, but keeping things completely hidden cannot possibly help in changing the current climate. Don't name people necessarily by real names, but these are pretend names. Why not have a wall of shame for those pretend names? Why protect the victimizers?
First thing... It isn't our responsibility to pass judgement on the players. Sure, we can, but it does not matter if we do, or not.
Report them in the game, and if ZOS agrees and wants to take action, they will. If they don't want to take action, there is little we can do about it. Reports in here, even ones that include a video, are subjective and anecdotal. None of them speak with authority towards the intent of the player that they are accusing. When posted in the forum, I treat them as rumor and hearsay.
Anything we say or do in here on the subject is purely conversational entertainment. No one in here is actually protecting anyone. Explaining away of what they are doing as "good player" or "cheater" only counts for entertainment purposes. ZOS does not depend on the forums for enforcement.
These reports can be wrong, even if the person making the report is absolutely sure they are correct.I'm not talking about the people who haven't been confirmed as people cheating by ZOS. We all know the tendency of some people to claiming cheating when they lose, but those who HAVE been banned for it … I don't think it should remain in the shadows.
What is the point? This is between ZOS and the player. I agree that ZOS should announce how many get banned or suspended, but they do not. I think I know why, but I won't say in here.
If there may be any questions in regards to the rules, please feel free to take a few moments to review them here.Naming-and-Shaming: We do not allow posts or threads that are created for the purpose of “naming-and-shaming” other community member(s). “Naming-and-shaming” is the act of creating a post to call out an individual or group by name, and making them the subject of public accusation, ridicule and/or shaming. Generally, naming-and-shaming involves an in-game situation and/or Terms of Service violation, which the ESO Community Team is unable to assist with. A certain amount of rivalry and competitive razzing is healthy for any game community, especially one with PVP elements, but naming-and-shaming goes well beyond that. It typically elevates to a point where the subject feels legitimately harassed. We believe that naming-and-shaming posts and threads can be abused and are very harmful to the community. We also don't feel that publicly calling out or accusing others by name on our forums is in spirit of the game or our community. If you genuinely believe someone has violated our Terms of Service, you should report them in-game via the support interface — do not bring the situation onto the official ESO community forums.
ZOS_GregoryV wrote: »Greetings all,
Just to clarify, as it is stated in our rules:If there may be any questions in regards to the rules, please feel free to take a few moments to review them here.Naming-and-Shaming: We do not allow posts or threads that are created for the purpose of “naming-and-shaming” other community member(s). “Naming-and-shaming” is the act of creating a post to call out an individual or group by name, and making them the subject of public accusation, ridicule and/or shaming. Generally, naming-and-shaming involves an in-game situation and/or Terms of Service violation, which the ESO Community Team is unable to assist with. A certain amount of rivalry and competitive razzing is healthy for any game community, especially one with PVP elements, but naming-and-shaming goes well beyond that. It typically elevates to a point where the subject feels legitimately harassed. We believe that naming-and-shaming posts and threads can be abused and are very harmful to the community. We also don't feel that publicly calling out or accusing others by name on our forums is in spirit of the game or our community. If you genuinely believe someone has violated our Terms of Service, you should report them in-game via the support interface — do not bring the situation onto the official ESO community forums.
Thank you for your understanding,
-Greg-
Ash_In_My_Sujamma wrote: »Why not just block the person you believe is a cheater from the start and prevent him from starting a conversation with you? Because all I am getting from what you are saying is that you need a way to justify your theory that there are cheaters in Cyrodiil. Nothing more would come from implementing your idea. You want the moral high ground.
Because incontrovertible proof of a cheat is not as simple as players may think, and because publishing names serves little useful purpose beyond catharsis for some.
A permanent block of a player is virtually impossible in any game if that player is committed to playing and cheating, unless ZoS implements something akin to fingerprint or retina scan login IDs. And even that could be easily bypassed with an accomplice or adequate engineering.
TequilaFire wrote: »I think it was a Rockstar game where cheaters and griefers were given a dunce cap and were restricted to playing only with other cheaters for a while.