Etchesketch wrote: »Another roflol moment. If you are going to throw around stupid words like spurious, learn to read first. I never ever said gold buyers contribute to the community. I said they don't affect me like the sellers and botters do.
Some of you are funny.
They do affect you if you take part in the economy in any way, since an influx of currency into an economy always inflates prices. Makes it harder for non-gold buyers to purchase when the buyers are inflating prices.
Etchesketch wrote: »I don't know what some folks are smoking but it's basic economics. These other games you mention that go F2P are doing it for a reason, it's because they can make more money by selling ingame stuff the the smaller community of players than trying to maintain the larger community of subscription based players.
You start banning subscribers for buying gold and you will quickly learn what F2P games are like, cause this game will do the same. It's business to them, not a game at all. The online gaming world is littered with subscription wannabe games, where are they now? Most never last a year on subscriptions.
If they cant stop the spam, they can't ban buyers. Period.
Lastly, I don't buy gold. As I stated.
Etchesketch wrote: »I don't know what some folks are smoking but it's basic economics. These other games you mention that go F2P are doing it for a reason, it's because they can make more money by selling ingame stuff the the smaller community of players than trying to maintain the larger community of subscription based players.
You start banning subscribers for buying gold and you will quickly learn what F2P games are like, cause this game will do the same. It's business to them, not a game at all. The online gaming world is littered with subscription wannabe games, where are they now? Most never last a year on subscriptions.
If they cant stop the spam, they can't ban buyers. Period.
Lastly, I don't buy gold. As I stated.
And yet, CCP Games has managed to run a successful subscription-based game for a decade, while being known for having some of the least forgiving policies for in-game misdeeds. Yes, you can learn from the failures. You might also learn from the successes.
Etchesketch wrote: »Been playing Eve since day one.
Yeah...the meanie poo poo heads like you guys.
People like you make me wanna not live on this planet anymore. You cannot take a joke and don't understand the concept of friendship and fair treatment....
YourNameHere wrote: »Ban both.
And the buyers usually get shafted as well when their info and CC card number is stolen.
Just ... don't do it. Really. Report and hope Zenimax works on culling this down.
Yeah...the meanie poo poo heads like you guys.
Yeah, we are bad, bad people for not wanting both sides of gold business to go away...
Also, the part I love - Your friends would quit if there would be gold buyers ban? Does it mean nothing to them that you play with them, honest, not gold-buying palyer? Oh, let me quote You:People like you make me wanna not live on this planet anymore. You cannot take a joke and don't understand the concept of friendship and fair treatment....
Your friends don't understand it either it seems...
Etchesketch wrote: »Another roflol moment. If you are going to throw around stupid words like spurious, learn to read first. I never ever said gold buyers contribute to the community. I said they don't affect me like the sellers and botters do.
Some of you are funny.
Etchesketch wrote: »I like Eve but it's a completely different model for business.
If you think ESO will be happy with the sub numbers for EVE you are mistaken.
I still have my AC account on Morninghthaw, but the sub numbers for that game are not going to trip any triggers either.
When you compare games, you need to compare apples with apples.
YourNameHere wrote: »Ban both.
And the buyers usually get shafted as well when their info and CC card number is stolen.
Just ... don't do it. Really. Report and hope Zenimax works on culling this down.
Three strikes buyers....ban sellers...please don't perma ban people that wanna play the game.
EVE Online - Player statistics, Server status.
Currently online: 26,152, Health: ok. Max (24h): 40,972 (2014-04-12 19:31:04)
Not really successful so much as..afloat...my friends won't play EVE online because of the harsh and unnecessary penalty's.
EVE Online - Player statistics, Server status.
Currently online: 26,152, Health: ok. Max (24h): 40,972 (2014-04-12 19:31:04)
Not really successful so much as..afloat...my friends won't play EVE online because of the harsh and unnecessary penalty's.
I don't know. In some ways, WoW has given people an unrealistic idea of what it means to be successful. It's like comparing every book's sales to Twilight or Harry Potter.
Looking at some stat sites, it says that Eve has 500K subscribers. If that's true and they're paying $14.95 a month, that's almost $7 1/2 million a month. That's a lot of money and plenty for any MMO to be successful. Even a fraction of that would be enough. Even 100K subscribers would be $1 1/2 million a month almost.
Sure, devs would like to hit WoW numbers, but you don't have to get anywhere near them to have a successful game.
starkerealm wrote: »Etchesketch wrote: »Another roflol moment. If you are going to throw around stupid words like spurious, learn to read first. I never ever said gold buyers contribute to the community. I said they don't affect me like the sellers and botters do.
Some of you are funny.
Yeah, insomnia's a ***. I mixed your post over with Tweek's and someone else's. You can call it, "The price you pay for being deputized into someone else's argument against your will." But, on that subject, this bares no resemblance to the original post you made so... "some of you are funny."
EVE Online - Player statistics, Server status.
Currently online: 26,152, Health: ok. Max (24h): 40,972 (2014-04-12 19:31:04)
Not really successful so much as..afloat...my friends won't play EVE online because of the harsh and unnecessary penalty's.
I don't know. In some ways, WoW has given people an unrealistic idea of what it means to be successful. It's like comparing every book's sales to Twilight or Harry Potter.
Looking at some stat sites, it says that Eve has 500K subscribers. If that's true and they're paying $14.95 a month, that's almost $7 1/2 million a month. That's a lot of money and plenty for any MMO to be successful. Even a fraction of that would be enough. Even 100K subscribers would be $1 1/2 million a month almost.
Sure, devs would like to hit WoW numbers, but you don't have to get anywhere near them to have a successful game.
starkerealm wrote: »
Also where TOR got into trouble. It managed to be both "the fastest selling MMO of all time" and "failed to meet sales expectations" at the same time. EA wanted it's own personal WoW dumping into it's pockets every month.
He's a bit afraid about his account right now I guess, becase Zenimax could go for some drastic measures sorting gold problem and you know, you might or might not be around afterwards. I liked when he was calling me "not civil" and then started calling people "poo poo head meanies".
Etchesketch wrote: »I don't know what some folks are smoking but it's basic economics. These other games you mention that go F2P are doing it for a reason, it's because they can make more money by selling ingame stuff the the smaller community of players than trying to maintain the larger community of subscription based players.
You start banning subscribers for buying gold and you will quickly learn what F2P games are like, cause this game will do the same. It's business to them, not a game at all. The online gaming world is littered with subscription wannabe games, where are they now? Most never last a year on subscriptions.
If they cant stop the spam, they can't ban buyers. Period.
Lastly, I don't buy gold. As I stated.
And yet, CCP Games has managed to run a successful subscription-based game for a decade, while being known for having some of the least forgiving policies for in-game misdeeds. Yes, you can learn from the failures. You might also learn from the successes.
EVE Online - Player statistics, Server status.
Currently online: 26,152, Health: ok. Max (24h): 40,972 (2014-04-12 19:31:04)
Not really successful so much as..afloat...my friends won't play EVE online because of the harsh and unnecessary penalty's.
Hyperventilate wrote: »Is the only argument you have for your friends, "But, but... they're my friends! I'll stand by my friends!"
Cool, they're your friends. We can appreciate a good bromance.
But are you seriously so blind that you really can't acknowledge that your friends are the kind of people who exacerbate the cycle of gold sellers -> gold spam -> gold buyers?
Your friends are the problem. They bought gold. Once? Twice? Two hundred times? Doesn't matter. Gold sellers can't sell gold if there isn't a market to sell it to. Your buddies buying gold tells the gold sellers that if they hang around long enough, people will absolutely buy from them.
If your friends didn't want to run the risk of punishment (In what universe does any game dev advocate and give free passes to gold buyers?) they shouldn't have bought gold. I highly doubt your buddies regret what they did, and you yourself have probably profited from their gold buying.
Etchesketch wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »Etchesketch wrote: »Another roflol moment. If you are going to throw around stupid words like spurious, learn to read first. I never ever said gold buyers contribute to the community. I said they don't affect me like the sellers and botters do.
Some of you are funny.
Yeah, insomnia's a ***. I mixed your post over with Tweek's and someone else's. You can call it, "The price you pay for being deputized into someone else's argument against your will." But, on that subject, this bares no resemblance to the original post you made so... "some of you are funny."
Not sure what this means, but I will just say I stick by my first statement.
If casual gamers log into this game they are going to assume that buying gold from these guys is fine, since they are "allowed" to non stop spam it. Banning people for doing something you are allowing to take place in the game is a bad bad idea.
starkerealm wrote: »Etchesketch wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »Etchesketch wrote: »Another roflol moment. If you are going to throw around stupid words like spurious, learn to read first. I never ever said gold buyers contribute to the community. I said they don't affect me like the sellers and botters do.
Some of you are funny.
Yeah, insomnia's a ***. I mixed your post over with Tweek's and someone else's. You can call it, "The price you pay for being deputized into someone else's argument against your will." But, on that subject, this bares no resemblance to the original post you made so... "some of you are funny."
Not sure what this means, but I will just say I stick by my first statement.
If casual gamers log into this game they are going to assume that buying gold from these guys is fine, since they are "allowed" to non stop spam it. Banning people for doing something you are allowing to take place in the game is a bad bad idea.
Yeah, that wasn't well articulated in the specific post I read, but I agree.
And, Tweek... or at least Tweek's buddies, are a big part of the problem. You have people who view gold buying as normative, and get snotty when they're punished for breaking the rules, because they just want the advantage.
It's actually worse for casual players, because you have the bots actively tightening the screws on them by snapping up the low level crafting nodes, pushing new players towards the vendors, and their prices that are unsustainable without the income from crafting or bosses. It's not intentional, but for the goldsellers it's convenient. Demand goes up, and they just keep doing what they're doing.
2 - I am grateful beyond belief for direct confirmation that people who fear harsh penalties for misdeeds avoid EVE. I pay a subscription even when I am not actively playing EVE just to support them - partly because of things like this. Thank you for validating trust in CCP's decision.