Taleof2Cities wrote: »Not a new idea ... it’s been discussed in the forums several times in the past.
And a good idea on paper.
Where it starts to break down is when ZOS loses their gold sink from players not needing to respec skills and champion points.
And I really hate it every time it rears its ugly head...Taleof2Cities wrote: »Not a new idea ... it’s been discussed in the forums several times in the past.
There are plenty of gold sinks in the game already. Be it repairs, housing and furnishings, trading between players, that sort of stuff.Taleof2Cities wrote: »Where it starts to break down is when ZOS loses their gold sink from players not needing to respec skills and champion points.
TheShadowScout wrote: »And I really hate it every time it rears its ugly head...Taleof2Cities wrote: »Not a new idea ... it’s been discussed in the forums several times in the past.
The thing I hate is, some people think they should not have to choose.
They do not want to have to choose if their character should be specializes for PvE at the expense of PvP, OR specialized for PvP at the expense of PvP, OR not specialized and excelling at neither while decent at both...
They do not want to choose if their character should be set up as DPS or as tank...
... and thus demand they should get some quick-change options for their CP setups, and their gear, perhaps even skill morphs... all because they think choices should not matter to them, all because they think they should be allowed to can have -both- options.
They want to -have- their cake, yet -eat- it too!
And I think having to pick one of those choices and stick with it (barring some annoying respecs) is actually better, as it ensures a more diverse range of characters running around, isntead of everyone switching to the current META all the time.
Besides, -choices- should matter, and people should -have- to make choices instead getting some way to "have it all"...
TheShadowScout wrote: »And I really hate it every time it rears its ugly head...Taleof2Cities wrote: »Not a new idea ... it’s been discussed in the forums several times in the past.
The thing I hate is, some people think they should not have to choose.
They do not want to have to choose if their character should be specializes for PvE at the expense of PvP, OR specialized for PvP at the expense of PvP, OR not specialized and excelling at neither while decent at both...
They do not want to choose if their character should be set up as DPS or as tank...
... and thus demand they should get some quick-change options for their CP setups, and their gear, perhaps even skill morphs... all because they think choices should not matter to them, all because they think they should be allowed to can have -both- options.
They want to -have- their cake, yet -eat- it too!
And I think having to pick one of those choices and stick with it (barring some annoying respecs) is actually better, as it ensures a more diverse range of characters running around, isntead of everyone switching to the current META all the time.
Besides, -choices- should matter, and people should -have- to make choices instead getting some way to "have it all"...
TheShadowScout wrote: »And I really hate it every time it rears its ugly head...Taleof2Cities wrote: »Not a new idea ... it’s been discussed in the forums several times in the past.
The thing I hate is, some people think they should not have to choose.
They do not want to have to choose if their character should be specializes for PvE at the expense of PvP, OR specialized for PvP at the expense of PvP, OR not specialized and excelling at neither while decent at both...
They do not want to choose if their character should be set up as DPS or as tank...
... and thus demand they should get some quick-change options for their CP setups, and their gear, perhaps even skill morphs... all because they think choices should not matter to them, all because they think they should be allowed to can have -both- options.
They want to -have- their cake, yet -eat- it too!
And I think having to pick one of those choices and stick with it (barring some annoying respecs) is actually better, as it ensures a more diverse range of characters running around, isntead of everyone switching to the current META all the time.
Besides, -choices- should matter, and people should -have- to make choices instead getting some way to "have it all"...
And I hate those just as much!oli.j.reillyb16_ESO wrote: »Half the things you’re griping about are already possible with addons anyway.
And that is the most overused reply to my point of view.so you don't like convenience options? if a system like this comes out simply don't use it instead of trying to make people bend to your viewpoint on how a playstyle should be restricted.
And that is their choice.The_Red_Viper wrote: »Not everyone has the time to level up, grind skill trees and gear 15 characters like you do. It is not even about just having the time, but the sheer boredom of it. Most people rather just quit or not level at all, than have to level a class they already have at max level, just to play a different build.
How so?The_Red_Viper wrote: »And stop using that cake idiom please. It is overused on this forum and most people don't even know how to use it, just like your fine example here.
...when its extremely clear that ANY "convenience option" will come with a hefty crown price. Just like at "account wide skyshards"!Yes, the game should have it. No, it should not be a crown store option.
TheShadowScout wrote: »And I hate those just as much!oli.j.reillyb16_ESO wrote: »Half the things you’re griping about are already possible with addons anyway.
Never use them myself.And that is the most overused reply to my point of view.so you don't like convenience options? if a system like this comes out simply don't use it instead of trying to make people bend to your viewpoint on how a playstyle should be restricted.
"Just don't use it", except then we will get elitists who will vote-kick anyone not using "the system" from their grouls. Not that I'd care, since I am too sociophobic to PUG anyhow, but still...
The point is, its way more then a "convenience", its leeching the fun out of things! And yes, I found that to be the case playing games that had such options, for -me- anyhow.And that is their choice.The_Red_Viper wrote: »Not everyone has the time to level up, grind skill trees and gear 15 characters like you do. It is not even about just having the time, but the sheer boredom of it. Most people rather just quit or not level at all, than have to level a class they already have at max level, just to play a different build.
They can level whatever they like, whatever they have time for... (and yes, it is mind-mumbingly boring after the forst half dozend times...)
They can even level only one per class, and then respec it to try a new setup. That is already in the game. its just not something you can do "in the field", and -that- idea is exactly what I dislike so much!
I am just opposed to switching around nilly-willy at the press of a button - that is all right for weapon swaps, but not for redoing the whgole character, armor and cp snd skill setup and whatever.How so?The_Red_Viper wrote: »And stop using that cake idiom please. It is overused on this forum and most people don't even know how to use it, just like your fine example here.
People here want to be able to have all the choices. Like with the cake, where you either can choose to eat it, and then its gone; or can choose to have it remain intact, but then you cannot eat it.
Well, or buy a second cake, but that is -exactly- the "spend time to raise another alt" thing you mentioned.
But in the end, all I see in reply to my point of view here is the whining of the "gimme crowd", whose arguments are like:...when its extremely clear that ANY "convenience option" will come with a hefty crown price. Just like at "account wide skyshards"!Yes, the game should have it. No, it should not be a crown store option.
And yet those people do not point out how it would benefit ZOS to let people avoid such choices, when they clearly -want- to have people make another alt to try some new setup, in the hopes that people might spend crowns on another set of costumes, another set of outfit visuals, etc.
So, go on. Say how it would benefit ZOS to add "dualspec" options so people with less time can play less to get the same effect. And how it should benefit their bottom line to spend the resopurces of implementing that without charging a load of crowns for it.
Taleof2Cities wrote: »Not a new idea ... it’s been discussed in the forums several times in the past.
And a good idea on paper.
Where it starts to break down is when ZOS loses their gold sink from players not needing to respec skills and champion points.
TheShadowScout wrote: »
The thing I hate is, some people think they should not have to choose.
They do not want to have to choose if their character should be specializes for PvE at the expense of PvP, OR specialized for PvP at the expense of PvP, OR not specialized and excelling at neither while decent at both...
They do not want to choose if their character should be set up as DPS or as tank...
... and thus demand they should get some quick-change options for their CP setups, and their gear, perhaps even skill morphs... all because they think choices should not matter to them, all because they think they should be allowed to can have -both- options.
They want to -have- their cake, yet -eat- it too!
And I think having to pick one of those choices and stick with it (barring some annoying respecs) is actually better, as it ensures a more diverse range of characters running around, isntead of everyone switching to the current META all the time.
Besides, -choices- should matter, and people should -have- to make choices instead getting some way to "have it all"...