From what you say you would not like the Argonian passives regardless unless they made them to be like the Orc passives.
Then you create a poll where the question is very generic as though it would support trying to get Zos to change the Argonian passive to what you want, the Orc passives.
I am just going to give you the simple facts. Pretty much everyone wants something different so just saying you want something different for warm fuzzy reasons, which is what is done here, will fall on deaf ears with Zos, especially when you want the change to be something totally different than what it has been .
So sorry you want an Orc that looks like an Argonian but I doubt that is sufficient reasoning for Zos to make it happen.,
Seraphayel wrote: »Players that chose Argonian before the changes knew what they could expect from the race. In that regard nothing changed.
I don't know why Argonian players were expecting buffs to DPS racials when there was no indication for that to happen (or to be necessary). Argonian was always about healing and their very strong utility passives and in that regard they are still excellent. They make great healers and tanks even after the changes and I couldn't care less if Bretons might be a little bit better due to sustain or whatever.
If you want to be competitive DPS wise you didn't pick Argonian to begin with. If 1-2k DPS matter that much for you your choice already was Altmer, Dunmer or whatever.
To say Argonians are shoehorned into healing or being one of the "worst" DPS races is a very narrow-minded view on the race that still will be an excellent pick for PvP.
Don't get me wrong, they could increase Stamina/Magicka a bit or transform the healing passive into Spell Damage but besides that Argonians were not to expect significant DPS racials or changes in that regard.
Silver_Strider wrote: »Seraphayel wrote: »Players that chose Argonian before the changes knew what they could expect from the race. In that regard nothing changed.
I don't know why Argonian players were expecting buffs to DPS racials when there was no indication for that to happen (or to be necessary). Argonian was always about healing and their very strong utility passives and in that regard they are still excellent. They make great healers and tanks even after the changes and I couldn't care less if Bretons might be a little bit better due to sustain or whatever.
If you want to be competitive DPS wise you didn't pick Argonian to begin with. If 1-2k DPS matter that much for you your choice already was Altmer, Dunmer or whatever.
To say Argonians are shoehorned into healing or being one of the "worst" DPS races is a very narrow-minded view on the race that still will be an excellent pick for PvP.
Don't get me wrong, they could increase Stamina/Magicka a bit or transform the healing passive into Spell Damage but besides that Argonians were not to expect significant DPS racials or changes in that regard.
There was no indication that Khajiit would be made into valid Magic DPS either but it happened anyways so why is this even an argument?
Seraphayel wrote: »Silver_Strider wrote: »Seraphayel wrote: »Players that chose Argonian before the changes knew what they could expect from the race. In that regard nothing changed.
I don't know why Argonian players were expecting buffs to DPS racials when there was no indication for that to happen (or to be necessary). Argonian was always about healing and their very strong utility passives and in that regard they are still excellent. They make great healers and tanks even after the changes and I couldn't care less if Bretons might be a little bit better due to sustain or whatever.
If you want to be competitive DPS wise you didn't pick Argonian to begin with. If 1-2k DPS matter that much for you your choice already was Altmer, Dunmer or whatever.
To say Argonians are shoehorned into healing or being one of the "worst" DPS races is a very narrow-minded view on the race that still will be an excellent pick for PvP.
Don't get me wrong, they could increase Stamina/Magicka a bit or transform the healing passive into Spell Damage but besides that Argonians were not to expect significant DPS racials or changes in that regard.
There was no indication that Khajiit would be made into valid Magic DPS either but it happened anyways so why is this even an argument?
True that. The important point is that Khajiit never were a "utility" race like Argonians, they were a pure damage race. Same with Dunmer. That's why they're still an excellent damage race but now for Magicka and Stamina builds. In the end nothing changed for both races when it comes to their role disposition.
Argonians never were a damage race. That's why this is an argument. Argonian was no DPS race and won't be in the future.
You can choose, sustain or damage or utility. Those are the three categories for races (with Khajiit being a weaker mix of damage and sustain at the same time).
Argonians are a utility (tank) race and there was no indication for any changes in that regard.
Tanks can make use of any of the passives and make up for the difference with gear, any race can be a tank, some are just more straightforward than others.Seraphayel wrote: »Silver_Strider wrote: »Seraphayel wrote: »Players that chose Argonian before the changes knew what they could expect from the race. In that regard nothing changed.
I don't know why Argonian players were expecting buffs to DPS racials when there was no indication for that to happen (or to be necessary). Argonian was always about healing and their very strong utility passives and in that regard they are still excellent. They make great healers and tanks even after the changes and I couldn't care less if Bretons might be a little bit better due to sustain or whatever.
If you want to be competitive DPS wise you didn't pick Argonian to begin with. If 1-2k DPS matter that much for you your choice already was Altmer, Dunmer or whatever.
To say Argonians are shoehorned into healing or being one of the "worst" DPS races is a very narrow-minded view on the race that still will be an excellent pick for PvP.
Don't get me wrong, they could increase Stamina/Magicka a bit or transform the healing passive into Spell Damage but besides that Argonians were not to expect significant DPS racials or changes in that regard.
There was no indication that Khajiit would be made into valid Magic DPS either but it happened anyways so why is this even an argument?
True that. The important point is that Khajiit never were a "utility" race like Argonians, they were a pure damage race. Same with Dunmer. That's why they're still an excellent damage race but now for Magicka and Stamina builds. In the end nothing changed for both races when it comes to their role disposition.
Argonians never were a damage race. That's why this is an argument. Argonian was no DPS race and won't be in the future.
You can choose, sustain or damage or utility. Those are the three categories for races (with Khajiit being a weaker mix of damage and sustain at the same time).
Argonians are a utility (tank) race and there was no indication for any changes in that regard.
A net loss if you are using anything but tripots.Olupajmibanan wrote: »Have you ever heard of Infused jewelry with pot CD reduction glyphs?
Seraphayel wrote: »Silver_Strider wrote: »Seraphayel wrote: »Players that chose Argonian before the changes knew what they could expect from the race. In that regard nothing changed.
I don't know why Argonian players were expecting buffs to DPS racials when there was no indication for that to happen (or to be necessary). Argonian was always about healing and their very strong utility passives and in that regard they are still excellent. They make great healers and tanks even after the changes and I couldn't care less if Bretons might be a little bit better due to sustain or whatever.
If you want to be competitive DPS wise you didn't pick Argonian to begin with. If 1-2k DPS matter that much for you your choice already was Altmer, Dunmer or whatever.
To say Argonians are shoehorned into healing or being one of the "worst" DPS races is a very narrow-minded view on the race that still will be an excellent pick for PvP.
Don't get me wrong, they could increase Stamina/Magicka a bit or transform the healing passive into Spell Damage but besides that Argonians were not to expect significant DPS racials or changes in that regard.
There was no indication that Khajiit would be made into valid Magic DPS either but it happened anyways so why is this even an argument?
True that. The important point is that Khajiit never were a "utility" race like Argonians, they were a pure damage race. Same with Dunmer. That's why they're still an excellent damage race but now for Magicka and Stamina builds. In the end nothing changed for both races when it comes to their role disposition.
Argonians never were a damage race. That's why this is an argument. Argonian was no DPS race and won't be in the future.
You can choose, sustain or damage or utility. Those are the three categories for races (with Khajiit being a weaker mix of damage and sustain at the same time).
Argonians are a utility (tank) race and there was no indication for any changes in that regard.
How is this balance though?
is why.No I have argonian for argonian passives andI have different races for their different passives and I may choose to race change some races for their passives but in the end I want argonian passives so I have argonian and I dont want orc passives and If i wanted Orc passives i would make orc not claim my argonian needs to have orc passives.
Seraphayel wrote: »Silver_Strider wrote: »Seraphayel wrote: »Players that chose Argonian before the changes knew what they could expect from the race. In that regard nothing changed.
I don't know why Argonian players were expecting buffs to DPS racials when there was no indication for that to happen (or to be necessary). Argonian was always about healing and their very strong utility passives and in that regard they are still excellent. They make great healers and tanks even after the changes and I couldn't care less if Bretons might be a little bit better due to sustain or whatever.
If you want to be competitive DPS wise you didn't pick Argonian to begin with. If 1-2k DPS matter that much for you your choice already was Altmer, Dunmer or whatever.
To say Argonians are shoehorned into healing or being one of the "worst" DPS races is a very narrow-minded view on the race that still will be an excellent pick for PvP.
Don't get me wrong, they could increase Stamina/Magicka a bit or transform the healing passive into Spell Damage but besides that Argonians were not to expect significant DPS racials or changes in that regard.
There was no indication that Khajiit would be made into valid Magic DPS either but it happened anyways so why is this even an argument?
True that. The important point is that Khajiit never were a "utility" race like Argonians, they were a pure damage race. Same with Dunmer. That's why they're still an excellent damage race but now for Magicka and Stamina builds. In the end nothing changed for both races when it comes to their role disposition.
Argonians never were a damage race. That's why this is an argument. Argonian was no DPS race and won't be in the future.
You can choose, sustain or damage or utility. Those are the three categories for races (with Khajiit being a weaker mix of damage and sustain at the same time).
Argonians are a utility (tank) race and there was no indication for any changes in that regard.