Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »As other have said, they aren't going broke. They just don't share the wealth, or reinvest in the game at all. It all gets syphoned to the top.
What would you like they do?
Reinvest in bigger and better dev teams . Like the size we had at launch . That's what I'd like to see . Better maintenance patches and larger bug fixes . The return of hot fixing problems . This costs money but shows the players they are committed to being best .
They mainly said B2P, and they were right. No one expected how money hungry they became though.
Worse than EA right now tbh
zParallaxz wrote: »
No they are not, Gina Bruno said they have no plans to balance combat if it may have been implied,” no this is not a canned response” was said by her. Her main reasoning was that there was not enough time.
NEWSFLASH... ZOS doesn't use PvP feedback to address the "class balance issues..." The ability to play how you want is a selling point for ESO. PvPers even admit that re: balance in PvE, "we're solid..."
Charliff1966 wrote: »ESO going broke? Nah, doomsayers (the Titanic cant sink, the cold water you feel is just a gimmick) and former players with a grudge might say it does but then again they need to give a reason why they quit (as if the world wants to know they quit playing a certain game). Leaving a dying game sounds more interresting then leaving a game because they dont like it anylonger. The rest of us just will keep playing and enjoying the fun.