We are currently investigating issues some players are having logging into the European PC/Mac megaserver. We will update as new information becomes available.

Belgium's Ruling on Lootboxes [Video Attached]

  • Kodrac
    Kodrac
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Not to be that guy, but I would like to ask exactly how the Crown Crates are anti consumer?
    JD2013 wrote: »
    - "A chance."

    No guarantee of good shinies.

    You answered your own question.

    Except I didn't.

    Yes you did. i don't go to the grocery store and pay for a chance at a carton of milk. I don't shop on Amazon for a chance the item will be delivered to my house. If you can't see that "a chance" is anti-consumer you need help.

    Because food is an essential item.

    Digital items in an MMO are not life necessities.

    And?
  • JD2013
    JD2013
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Not to be that guy, but I would like to ask exactly how the Crown Crates are anti consumer?
    JD2013 wrote: »
    - "A chance."

    No guarantee of good shinies.

    You answered your own question.

    Except I didn't.

    Yes you did. i don't go to the grocery store and pay for a chance at a carton of milk. I don't shop on Amazon for a chance the item will be delivered to my house. If you can't see that "a chance" is anti-consumer you need help.

    Because food is an essential item.

    Digital items in an MMO are not life necessities.

    And?

    And your comparison is faulty logic.

    People aren't going to start putting life necessities into loot boxes.

    These are cosmetic items in a game. Not exactly necessity are they?
    Sweetrolls for all!

    Christophe Mottierre - Breton Templar with his own whole darn estate! Templar Houses are so 2015. EU DC

    PC Beta Tester January 2014

    Elder of The Black
    Order of Sithis
    The Runners

    @TamrielTraverse - For Tamriel related Twitter shenanigans!
    https://tamrieltraveller.wordpress.com/

    Crafting bag OP! ZOS nerf pls!
  • POps75p
    POps75p
    ✭✭✭✭
    JD2013 wrote: »
    If ZOS are forced to remove crown crates, then they will have to come up with other things to make more money.

    I guarantee you that people will be begging them to bring back crown crates with some of the stuff a company could do to make more money in a game.

    they can then sell the real play to play stuff, now that's worth buying vs gambling on trying to get some stupid ass horse
  • Zordrage
    Zordrage
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Not to be that guy, but I would like to ask exactly how the Crown Crates are anti consumer?
    JD2013 wrote: »
    - "A chance."

    No guarantee of good shinies.

    You answered your own question.

    Except I didn't.

    Yes you did. i don't go to the grocery store and pay for a chance at a carton of milk. I don't shop on Amazon for a chance the item will be delivered to my house. If you can't see that "a chance" is anti-consumer you need help.

    Because food is an essential item.

    Digital items in an MMO are not life necessities.

    As an addendum - need help with what, exactly? The burden of independent thought separate from your thoughts?

    The irl money you spend on them is...

    and *** ALL RNG BOXES !!!!! BURN THEM BURN THEM ALL !!!!
  • Kodrac
    Kodrac
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Not to be that guy, but I would like to ask exactly how the Crown Crates are anti consumer?
    JD2013 wrote: »
    - "A chance."

    No guarantee of good shinies.

    You answered your own question.

    Except I didn't.

    Yes you did. i don't go to the grocery store and pay for a chance at a carton of milk. I don't shop on Amazon for a chance the item will be delivered to my house. If you can't see that "a chance" is anti-consumer you need help.

    Because food is an essential item.

    Digital items in an MMO are not life necessities.

    And?

    And your comparison is faulty logic.

    People aren't going to start putting life necessities into loot boxes.

    These are cosmetic items in a game. Not exactly necessity are they?

    Doesn't matter. The point is you don't pay for a chance to get whatever you're shopping for, food or otherwise. A chance is anti-consumer. Again, I don't shop on Amazon for a chance whatever I buy will be delivered. I don't go to (insert store name) and hope I win the lottery for the (insert product) I came for. If you can't see how that's anti-consumer then.... I don't know what to say... really. Enjoy getting screwed I guess.
  • Dragath
    Dragath
    ✭✭✭✭
    crown crates are gambling in belgium, the ruling is clear on that part.
    a much more important question is, how will germany rule on that front, because germany is the big player in the EU.
    their ruling will most likely decide the future of loot boxes in europe.
  • Illurian
    Illurian
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    While I do enjoy the discussion that is going on (thanks everyone), I think we're getting a bit derailed here.

    Anti-consumer or not, what does this ruling mean for ESO in Europe? Does this mean that Belgian and Dutch players, specifically, will not be able to to buy Crown Crates, and thus not be able to obtain the items contained therein?

    Will ZOS just ignore it? Will it then have consequences for ZOS? Speculate! :D
    Kiss the chaos.
  • JD2013
    JD2013
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Not to be that guy, but I would like to ask exactly how the Crown Crates are anti consumer?
    JD2013 wrote: »
    - "A chance."

    No guarantee of good shinies.

    You answered your own question.

    Except I didn't.

    Yes you did. i don't go to the grocery store and pay for a chance at a carton of milk. I don't shop on Amazon for a chance the item will be delivered to my house. If you can't see that "a chance" is anti-consumer you need help.

    Because food is an essential item.

    Digital items in an MMO are not life necessities.

    And?

    And your comparison is faulty logic.

    People aren't going to start putting life necessities into loot boxes.

    These are cosmetic items in a game. Not exactly necessity are they?

    Doesn't matter. The point is you don't pay for a chance to get whatever you're shopping for, food or otherwise. A chance is anti-consumer. Again, I don't shop on Amazon for a chance whatever I buy will be delivered. I don't go to (insert store name) and hope I win the lottery for the (insert product) I came for. If you can't see how that's anti-consumer then.... I don't know what to say... really. Enjoy getting screwed I guess.

    Except I don't play RNG games as I like to spend my money in better ways?

    And that is no comparison because that is not a real thing. There's no such thing as loot boxes in supermarkets or amazon etc. If they were a real thing it would be a comparison, but it isn't so ... Not a comparison.
    Sweetrolls for all!

    Christophe Mottierre - Breton Templar with his own whole darn estate! Templar Houses are so 2015. EU DC

    PC Beta Tester January 2014

    Elder of The Black
    Order of Sithis
    The Runners

    @TamrielTraverse - For Tamriel related Twitter shenanigans!
    https://tamrieltraveller.wordpress.com/

    Crafting bag OP! ZOS nerf pls!
  • Illurian
    Illurian
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Dragath wrote: »
    crown crates are gambling in belgium, the ruling is clear on that part.
    a much more important question is, how will germany rule on that front, because germany is the big player in the EU.
    their ruling will most likely decide the future of loot boxes in europe.

    That's fair, and especially if the entire EU rules lootboxes as illegal, we might see some change.

    But how will/can ZOS approach this ruling? Removing the sale of crown crates from Belgium consumers? How does that work? Is it even possible?

    If this ruling is taken seriously, I could see ZOS simply removing crown crates from the EU servers entirely. I just hope in this scenario that they would at least add the crown crate items to the crown store. (But imagine the uproar that would cause!)
    Kiss the chaos.
  • Kodrac
    Kodrac
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    JD2013 wrote: »
    There's no such thing as loot boxes in supermarkets or amazon etc. If they were a real thing it would be a comparison, but it isn't so ... Not a comparison.

    *facepalm*

    You asked how they're anti-consumer.
    They're anti-consumer because "a chance"
    There's a reason there aren't "chances" in supermarkets or Amazon, etc
    Because that's anti-consumer

    Do you not see the correlation yet?
  • Aurielle
    Aurielle
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Aurielle wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Aurielle wrote: »
    Skwor wrote: »
    The horse is dead, stop beating it.

    Also who cares what Belgium does it has 0 impact on this game in the US or anywhere else outside of facist Europe. Trying to impose your will on everyone else is offensive and tyrannical. Just stop already!

    Trying to protect people from toxic, anti-consumer business practices that prey on/contribute to addiction is “fascist” behaviour now? Okay. I’ll never understand why some people refuse to hold companies accountable for shady behaviour, “because capitalism.” But what do I know? I’m just some “socialist” Canadian.

    Anyway, I sadly doubt that Belgium’s ruling will have much effect. More gaming markets will have to get on board before RNG crates are eliminated.


    Not to be that guy, but I would like to ask exactly how the Crown Crates are anti consumer?

    Now, I don't buy them, I don't care for them, but I don't understand this obsession with eliminating them.

    People who choose to buy them of their own free will know exactly what they are getting. A chance to get some goodies.

    Notice the conditional clause - "A chance."

    No guarantee of good shinies. And yet people still go ahead in full and good knowledge of this, and press that buy button anyhow.

    The consumer knows what they are getting into. And go ahead anyhoo.

    Now, it is, of course, a thing that they could just put everything in the crown store. Bam. Done. But there's no guarantee of how many people would buy said product if they did. Crown Crates must be doing well, or else they would not keep doing it.

    And again, those that participate know full well what they are getting into. Addiction, to me, is the person's fault. I'm sorry if this offends you, but people are not innocent and don't necessarily need saving from big bad companies. People have free will. They will buy. I say this as a person with a couple of bad life habits. My fault. Nobody else's.

    Crown Crates are anti-consumer because they lock highly desirable products (see: radiant apex mounts) behind RNG with extremely low drop rates, in the hopes of compelling people to spend far more than they would if they offered the same product for a fixed rate. It is manipulative and predatory, and therefore anti-consumer, pro-corporation. See: the people who spent thousands trying to get the Plague Husk Horse. I can guarantee you that the same mount would not have sold in the Crown store for an equivalent price. ZOS is thousands of dollars richer from a few consumers who did not even get the item they were attempting to purchase. Anti-consumer, pro-corporation.

    Addiction is a disease, not a personal failing. I’m not offended by your lack of understanding, but I’d encourage you to do a bit of unbiased reading on the subject in medical journals/textbooks before blaming people for an unfortunate consequence of genetic susceptibility.

    Actually, as someone who suffers from depression and anxieties, as well as having a couple of bad habits (smoker being the worst) I understand all too well the differences between disease and personality failings. I also understand that it is my responsibility to keep myself away from that black cloud, and nobody else's, as it is my responsibility to break my bad habits. Again, nobody else's. Because I, as an individual am responsible for myself.

    As for anti-consumer, again I rebuke your description for the very simple reason of you using the old manipulative and predatory trope.

    People who play these crates, I am sure, know that they stand a low chance of gaining a HQ item. And yet they still buy them. I would also actually argue that none of the products are also that desirable. They are cosmetic additions that do nothing to contribute towards the actual gameplay.

    If someone is willing to spend hundreds of dollars to get a digital item for a game that will one day shut down and be lost to the ages, well that, to me, is foolish. A fool and his money are soon parted.
    danno8 wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    People who choose to buy them of their own free will know exactly what they are getting. A chance to get some goodies.

    Do they though? What are your chances of getting "that item" you want? That's one of the problems. You don't actually know what you chances are.

    I'm sorry if this offends you, but people are not innocent and don't necessarily need saving from big bad companies. People have free will. They will buy. I say this as a person with a couple of bad life habits. My fault. Nobody else's.

    But children do. An although certainly parent play the biggest role in this, If I were to look up the ESRB rating for ESO, I get this:

    http://www.esrb.org/ratings/Synopsis.aspx?Certificate=33311&Title=The+Elder+Scrolls+Online

    The "Mature" rating, which according to ESRB means "Blood and Gore, Sexual Themes, Use of Alcohol, Violence". Pretty bad, but I think most of us would find the level of those things in ESO to be pretty tame. My teenager could handle it. She's pretty well grounded in reality in my parental opinion.

    But notice how loot crates aren't mentioned at all on the page?

    To buy crates you literally have to go onto the account page and enter credit card details to buy crowns, and then you have to go back into the game to spend those crowns.

    Unless you have crowns already.

    If you allow a teenager access to your bank or credit card, well then that is up to you. Beware the risks that might come with it.

    Actually, you don’t understand the difference if you characterize smoking as a “bad habit.” I’m not going to argue with you on this. Please read up on the pathophysiological process of addiction in reputable, peer-reviewed medical sources before making unsubstantiated claims. You help NO ONE who suffers from addiction by insinuating that it’s “their fault” and that they can simply exercise “free will” if a company preys upon their addiction with no regulation whatsoever. Managing addiction is an intensely difficult process that usually requires a combination of pharmacology, sustained individual effort, AND family/community support.

    Believe it or not, there are some countries out there that look out for and support their citizens, rather than merely bowing to the almighty dollar.
  • Kalgert
    Kalgert
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Not to be that guy, but I would like to ask exactly how the Crown Crates are anti consumer?
    JD2013 wrote: »
    - "A chance."

    No guarantee of good shinies.

    You answered your own question.

    Except I didn't.

    Yes you did. i don't go to the grocery store and pay for a chance at a carton of milk. I don't shop on Amazon for a chance the item will be delivered to my house. If you can't see that "a chance" is anti-consumer you need help.

    Because food is an essential item.

    Digital items in an MMO are not life necessities.

    And?

    And your comparison is faulty logic.

    People aren't going to start putting life necessities into loot boxes.

    These are cosmetic items in a game. Not exactly necessity are they?

    It's still on the same principal.

    You go to a store (Crown Store or anything like it), and if you want to buy something, then you buy it.

    Lootboxes, however, put that something in to a box and is thrown in to a massive pile of other boxes, and then you get one at random to get that something that you want.

    Microtransactions are smelly enough as it is (Because I remember a time when cosmetic items were featured as unlocks as opposed to something you buy), but lootboxes can pretty much generate ten times more money than a simple sale could. You don't see that as something fairly wrong?

    I'm actually feeling inclined to go on Steam and buy that Lootbox game for one Euro, just to simulate the feeling of opening up a lootbox so I don't have to buy any in this game (And the game is surprisingly well-presented for something that's probably using Unity Assets galore).

    Kind of like electric cigarettes: It's like smoking, only not really, and I hear it doesn't leave any negative effects behind
  • JD2013
    JD2013
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Aurielle wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Aurielle wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Aurielle wrote: »
    Skwor wrote: »
    The horse is dead, stop beating it.

    Also who cares what Belgium does it has 0 impact on this game in the US or anywhere else outside of facist Europe. Trying to impose your will on everyone else is offensive and tyrannical. Just stop already!

    Trying to protect people from toxic, anti-consumer business practices that prey on/contribute to addiction is “fascist” behaviour now? Okay. I’ll never understand why some people refuse to hold companies accountable for shady behaviour, “because capitalism.” But what do I know? I’m just some “socialist” Canadian.

    Anyway, I sadly doubt that Belgium’s ruling will have much effect. More gaming markets will have to get on board before RNG crates are eliminated.


    Not to be that guy, but I would like to ask exactly how the Crown Crates are anti consumer?

    Now, I don't buy them, I don't care for them, but I don't understand this obsession with eliminating them.

    People who choose to buy them of their own free will know exactly what they are getting. A chance to get some goodies.

    Notice the conditional clause - "A chance."

    No guarantee of good shinies. And yet people still go ahead in full and good knowledge of this, and press that buy button anyhow.

    The consumer knows what they are getting into. And go ahead anyhoo.

    Now, it is, of course, a thing that they could just put everything in the crown store. Bam. Done. But there's no guarantee of how many people would buy said product if they did. Crown Crates must be doing well, or else they would not keep doing it.

    And again, those that participate know full well what they are getting into. Addiction, to me, is the person's fault. I'm sorry if this offends you, but people are not innocent and don't necessarily need saving from big bad companies. People have free will. They will buy. I say this as a person with a couple of bad life habits. My fault. Nobody else's.

    Crown Crates are anti-consumer because they lock highly desirable products (see: radiant apex mounts) behind RNG with extremely low drop rates, in the hopes of compelling people to spend far more than they would if they offered the same product for a fixed rate. It is manipulative and predatory, and therefore anti-consumer, pro-corporation. See: the people who spent thousands trying to get the Plague Husk Horse. I can guarantee you that the same mount would not have sold in the Crown store for an equivalent price. ZOS is thousands of dollars richer from a few consumers who did not even get the item they were attempting to purchase. Anti-consumer, pro-corporation.

    Addiction is a disease, not a personal failing. I’m not offended by your lack of understanding, but I’d encourage you to do a bit of unbiased reading on the subject in medical journals/textbooks before blaming people for an unfortunate consequence of genetic susceptibility.

    Actually, as someone who suffers from depression and anxieties, as well as having a couple of bad habits (smoker being the worst) I understand all too well the differences between disease and personality failings. I also understand that it is my responsibility to keep myself away from that black cloud, and nobody else's, as it is my responsibility to break my bad habits. Again, nobody else's. Because I, as an individual am responsible for myself.

    As for anti-consumer, again I rebuke your description for the very simple reason of you using the old manipulative and predatory trope.

    People who play these crates, I am sure, know that they stand a low chance of gaining a HQ item. And yet they still buy them. I would also actually argue that none of the products are also that desirable. They are cosmetic additions that do nothing to contribute towards the actual gameplay.

    If someone is willing to spend hundreds of dollars to get a digital item for a game that will one day shut down and be lost to the ages, well that, to me, is foolish. A fool and his money are soon parted.
    danno8 wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    People who choose to buy them of their own free will know exactly what they are getting. A chance to get some goodies.

    Do they though? What are your chances of getting "that item" you want? That's one of the problems. You don't actually know what you chances are.

    I'm sorry if this offends you, but people are not innocent and don't necessarily need saving from big bad companies. People have free will. They will buy. I say this as a person with a couple of bad life habits. My fault. Nobody else's.

    But children do. An although certainly parent play the biggest role in this, If I were to look up the ESRB rating for ESO, I get this:

    http://www.esrb.org/ratings/Synopsis.aspx?Certificate=33311&Title=The+Elder+Scrolls+Online

    The "Mature" rating, which according to ESRB means "Blood and Gore, Sexual Themes, Use of Alcohol, Violence". Pretty bad, but I think most of us would find the level of those things in ESO to be pretty tame. My teenager could handle it. She's pretty well grounded in reality in my parental opinion.

    But notice how loot crates aren't mentioned at all on the page?

    To buy crates you literally have to go onto the account page and enter credit card details to buy crowns, and then you have to go back into the game to spend those crowns.

    Unless you have crowns already.

    If you allow a teenager access to your bank or credit card, well then that is up to you. Beware the risks that might come with it.

    Actually, you don’t understand the difference if you characterize smoking as a “bad habit.” I’m not going to argue with you on this. Please read up on the pathophysiological process of addiction in reputable, peer-reviewed medical sources before making unsubstantiated claims. You help NO ONE who suffers from addiction by insinuating that it’s “their fault” and that they can simply exercise “free will” if a company preys upon their addiction with no regulation whatsoever. Managing addiction is an intensely difficult process that usually requires a combination of pharmacology, sustained individual effort, AND family/community support.

    Believe it or not, there are some countries out there that look out for and support their citizens, rather than merely bowing to the almighty dollar.

    What on earth does this have to do with the almighty dollar?

    And yes, I do actually agree that addiction takes support. But ultimately, the individual needs to want to change and needs to want to help themselves first. Only the individual can decide on whether they want to accept that help or not. Almost like free will.

    And smoking is a bad habit. Addiction? Yes, of course. But it is also a bad habit. But I choose to do it. Nobody forces me to buy cigarettes, and I buy them myself, of my own volition.
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    There's no such thing as loot boxes in supermarkets or amazon etc. If they were a real thing it would be a comparison, but it isn't so ... Not a comparison.

    *facepalm*

    You asked how they're anti-consumer.
    They're anti-consumer because "a chance"
    There's a reason there aren't "chances" in supermarkets or Amazon, etc
    Because that's anti-consumer

    Do you not see the correlation yet?

    If they are so anti consumer, then why do so many consumers partake? Clearly they don't see it as anti consumer? And this here is really the crux of my whole thing. It is a person's right to spend their money that they earn in whatever fashion they choose without having anyone else tell them differently. If someone wants to spend a lot of money on lootboxes, then that is their right to do so without being talked down to by those who don't and never will buy them.
    Edited by JD2013 on May 1, 2018 2:44PM
    Sweetrolls for all!

    Christophe Mottierre - Breton Templar with his own whole darn estate! Templar Houses are so 2015. EU DC

    PC Beta Tester January 2014

    Elder of The Black
    Order of Sithis
    The Runners

    @TamrielTraverse - For Tamriel related Twitter shenanigans!
    https://tamrieltraveller.wordpress.com/

    Crafting bag OP! ZOS nerf pls!
  • Cadbury
    Cadbury
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Personally, I'm not going to be impressed until they play hardball and make some arrests. That'll get their attention.
    "If a person is truly desirous of something, perhaps being set on fire does not seem so bad."
  • Heka Cain
    Heka Cain
    ✭✭✭
    It is only a matter of time before the loot box nerf hammer hits ZOS, and hard; then ZOS will close down ESO for good!
  • Cadbury
    Cadbury
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Heka Cain wrote: »
    It is only a matter of time before the loot box nerf hammer hits ZOS, and hard; then ZOS will close down ESO for good!

    Then it's on to ESO 2
    "If a person is truly desirous of something, perhaps being set on fire does not seem so bad."
  • Kalgert
    Kalgert
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Aurielle wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Aurielle wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    Aurielle wrote: »
    Skwor wrote: »
    The horse is dead, stop beating it.

    Also who cares what Belgium does it has 0 impact on this game in the US or anywhere else outside of facist Europe. Trying to impose your will on everyone else is offensive and tyrannical. Just stop already!

    Trying to protect people from toxic, anti-consumer business practices that prey on/contribute to addiction is “fascist” behaviour now? Okay. I’ll never understand why some people refuse to hold companies accountable for shady behaviour, “because capitalism.” But what do I know? I’m just some “socialist” Canadian.

    Anyway, I sadly doubt that Belgium’s ruling will have much effect. More gaming markets will have to get on board before RNG crates are eliminated.


    Not to be that guy, but I would like to ask exactly how the Crown Crates are anti consumer?

    Now, I don't buy them, I don't care for them, but I don't understand this obsession with eliminating them.

    People who choose to buy them of their own free will know exactly what they are getting. A chance to get some goodies.

    Notice the conditional clause - "A chance."

    No guarantee of good shinies. And yet people still go ahead in full and good knowledge of this, and press that buy button anyhow.

    The consumer knows what they are getting into. And go ahead anyhoo.

    Now, it is, of course, a thing that they could just put everything in the crown store. Bam. Done. But there's no guarantee of how many people would buy said product if they did. Crown Crates must be doing well, or else they would not keep doing it.

    And again, those that participate know full well what they are getting into. Addiction, to me, is the person's fault. I'm sorry if this offends you, but people are not innocent and don't necessarily need saving from big bad companies. People have free will. They will buy. I say this as a person with a couple of bad life habits. My fault. Nobody else's.

    Crown Crates are anti-consumer because they lock highly desirable products (see: radiant apex mounts) behind RNG with extremely low drop rates, in the hopes of compelling people to spend far more than they would if they offered the same product for a fixed rate. It is manipulative and predatory, and therefore anti-consumer, pro-corporation. See: the people who spent thousands trying to get the Plague Husk Horse. I can guarantee you that the same mount would not have sold in the Crown store for an equivalent price. ZOS is thousands of dollars richer from a few consumers who did not even get the item they were attempting to purchase. Anti-consumer, pro-corporation.

    Addiction is a disease, not a personal failing. I’m not offended by your lack of understanding, but I’d encourage you to do a bit of unbiased reading on the subject in medical journals/textbooks before blaming people for an unfortunate consequence of genetic susceptibility.

    Actually, as someone who suffers from depression and anxieties, as well as having a couple of bad habits (smoker being the worst) I understand all too well the differences between disease and personality failings. I also understand that it is my responsibility to keep myself away from that black cloud, and nobody else's, as it is my responsibility to break my bad habits. Again, nobody else's. Because I, as an individual am responsible for myself.

    As for anti-consumer, again I rebuke your description for the very simple reason of you using the old manipulative and predatory trope.

    People who play these crates, I am sure, know that they stand a low chance of gaining a HQ item. And yet they still buy them. I would also actually argue that none of the products are also that desirable. They are cosmetic additions that do nothing to contribute towards the actual gameplay.

    If someone is willing to spend hundreds of dollars to get a digital item for a game that will one day shut down and be lost to the ages, well that, to me, is foolish. A fool and his money are soon parted.
    danno8 wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    People who choose to buy them of their own free will know exactly what they are getting. A chance to get some goodies.

    Do they though? What are your chances of getting "that item" you want? That's one of the problems. You don't actually know what you chances are.

    I'm sorry if this offends you, but people are not innocent and don't necessarily need saving from big bad companies. People have free will. They will buy. I say this as a person with a couple of bad life habits. My fault. Nobody else's.

    But children do. An although certainly parent play the biggest role in this, If I were to look up the ESRB rating for ESO, I get this:

    http://www.esrb.org/ratings/Synopsis.aspx?Certificate=33311&Title=The+Elder+Scrolls+Online

    The "Mature" rating, which according to ESRB means "Blood and Gore, Sexual Themes, Use of Alcohol, Violence". Pretty bad, but I think most of us would find the level of those things in ESO to be pretty tame. My teenager could handle it. She's pretty well grounded in reality in my parental opinion.

    But notice how loot crates aren't mentioned at all on the page?

    To buy crates you literally have to go onto the account page and enter credit card details to buy crowns, and then you have to go back into the game to spend those crowns.

    Unless you have crowns already.

    If you allow a teenager access to your bank or credit card, well then that is up to you. Beware the risks that might come with it.

    Actually, you don’t understand the difference if you characterize smoking as a “bad habit.” I’m not going to argue with you on this. Please read up on the pathophysiological process of addiction in reputable, peer-reviewed medical sources before making unsubstantiated claims. You help NO ONE who suffers from addiction by insinuating that it’s “their fault” and that they can simply exercise “free will” if a company preys upon their addiction with no regulation whatsoever. Managing addiction is an intensely difficult process that usually requires a combination of pharmacology, sustained individual effort, AND family/community support.

    Believe it or not, there are some countries out there that look out for and support their citizens, rather than merely bowing to the almighty dollar.

    What on earth does this have to do with the almighty dollar?

    And yes, I do actually agree that addiction takes support. But ultimately, the individual needs to want to change and needs to want to help themselves first. Only the individual can decide on whether they want to accept that help or not. Almost like free will.

    And smoking is a bad habit. Addiction? Yes, of course. But it is also a bad habit. But I choose to do it. Nobody forces me to buy cigarettes, and I buy them myself, of my own volition.
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    There's no such thing as loot boxes in supermarkets or amazon etc. If they were a real thing it would be a comparison, but it isn't so ... Not a comparison.

    *facepalm*

    You asked how they're anti-consumer.
    They're anti-consumer because "a chance"
    There's a reason there aren't "chances" in supermarkets or Amazon, etc
    Because that's anti-consumer

    Do you not see the correlation yet?

    If they are so anti consumer, then why do so many consumers partake? Clearly they don't see it as anti consumer?

    Addicts aren't very likely to agree to help unless they're pushed to their emotional brink (Until they crack, so to speak), because those people are pretty dependant on their addiction. Denying that and seeing it otherwise is fairly naive. And at least you're self aware of your addiction, but saying "Oh I am doing this because I choose to" is pretty much an addict's way of saying "I am smoking because I need to".

    And you are asking why people buy lootboxes? Well simple: People on the internet have less sense than money, and most of them are also prone to addiction. Gives developers a wide open door to get as much money from them as possible, no matter if it leaves people in debt or not.
  • Kodrac
    Kodrac
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    JD2013 wrote: »
    If they are so anti consumer, then why do so many consumers partake? Clearly they don't see it as anti consumer?

    I wouldn't say clearly. That probably has multiple reasons.
    • Completionists/OCD (they buy to fill gaps in the collection)
    • Addictive personalities (they buy for the thrill of RNG)
    • Self control/restraint (they know they don't need it, but can't help themselves)
    • S**s and giggles (they buy just because they can/show off)

    Not a complete list but just ones I can think of at the moment. All of which can be predatory in nature.

    EDIT: As to your edit -
    JD2013 wrote: »
    If someone wants to spend a lot of money on lootboxes, then that is their right to do so without being talked down to by those who don't and never will buy them.
    That's something else entirely. There are people out there that like to bully (ex. you bought crates you're an idiot) and that's not right. But there's also those that are just speaking out angainst anti-consumer and/or predatory practices. I can only speak for myself, but I'm not trying to talk down to anyone by explaining how they're anti-consumer. If I come off angsty that's directed squarely at ZoS.
    Edited by Kodrac on May 1, 2018 3:01PM
  • JD2013
    JD2013
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Kodrac wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    If they are so anti consumer, then why do so many consumers partake? Clearly they don't see it as anti consumer?

    I wouldn't say clearly. That probably has multiple reasons.
    • Completionists/OCD (they buy to fill gaps in the collection)
    • Addictive personalities (they buy for the thrill of RNG)
    • Self control/restraint (they know they don't need it, but can't help themselves)
    • S**s and giggles (they buy just because they can/show off)

    Not a complete list but just ones I can think of at the moment. All of which can be predatory in nature.

    You and I are clearly not going to agree here on a lot of things.

    I do agree that those who have addictive personalities should seek help. But ultimately, ZOS are not responsible to mollycoddle people who can't control themselves. That should ultimately fall on those who play the game, their support network or whatever. Individual responsibility has decreased so much over time that it is now mostly the standard thing to blame someone else for problems, because goodness forbid they should ever take a look at themselves and take responsibility for their actions.

    I rather think that we have reached stalemate and I respect your opinions, but I also have my own opinions. I do enjoy a good debate though, so thank you for that.
    Edited by JD2013 on May 1, 2018 2:59PM
    Sweetrolls for all!

    Christophe Mottierre - Breton Templar with his own whole darn estate! Templar Houses are so 2015. EU DC

    PC Beta Tester January 2014

    Elder of The Black
    Order of Sithis
    The Runners

    @TamrielTraverse - For Tamriel related Twitter shenanigans!
    https://tamrieltraveller.wordpress.com/

    Crafting bag OP! ZOS nerf pls!
  • danno8
    danno8
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    JD2013 wrote: »
    To buy crates you literally have to go onto the account page and enter credit card details to buy crowns, and then you have to go back into the game to spend those crowns.

    Unless you have crowns already.

    If you allow a teenager access to your bank or credit card, well then that is up to you. Beware the risks that might come with it.

    No doubt.

    But you ignored the bulk of my concerns. Do you think ZoS and other companies should reveal the actual odds of winning items in Crown Crates, and that they should be required to state that many items in the game can only be won through games of chance that require the purchase of either ESO+ or Crowns?

    I personally think it is important information to be upfront about.
  • Charliff1966
    Charliff1966
    ✭✭✭
    Illurian wrote: »
    Dragath wrote: »
    crown crates are gambling in belgium, the ruling is clear on that part.
    a much more important question is, how will germany rule on that front, because germany is the big player in the EU.
    their ruling will most likely decide the future of loot boxes in europe.

    That's fair, and especially if the entire EU rules lootboxes as illegal, we might see some change.

    But how will/can ZOS approach this ruling? Removing the sale of crown crates from Belgium consumers? How does that work? Is it even possible?

    If this ruling is taken seriously, I could see ZOS simply removing crown crates from the EU servers entirely. I just hope in this scenario that they would at least add the crown crate items to the crown store. (But imagine the uproar that would cause!)

    If they get removed from the EU servers then what about EU-people playing on the US servers? Block them?
    Edited by Charliff1966 on May 1, 2018 3:07PM
  • JD2013
    JD2013
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    danno8 wrote: »
    JD2013 wrote: »
    To buy crates you literally have to go onto the account page and enter credit card details to buy crowns, and then you have to go back into the game to spend those crowns.

    Unless you have crowns already.

    If you allow a teenager access to your bank or credit card, well then that is up to you. Beware the risks that might come with it.

    No doubt.

    But you ignored the bulk of my concerns. Do you think ZoS and other companies should reveal the actual odds of winning items in Crown Crates, and that they should be required to state that many items in the game can only be won through games of chance that require the purchase of either ESO+ or Crowns?

    I personally think it is important information to be upfront about.

    Actually, yes. I think it would be a good thing to post odds of winning X items. I don't see that as a bad thing at all.
    Sweetrolls for all!

    Christophe Mottierre - Breton Templar with his own whole darn estate! Templar Houses are so 2015. EU DC

    PC Beta Tester January 2014

    Elder of The Black
    Order of Sithis
    The Runners

    @TamrielTraverse - For Tamriel related Twitter shenanigans!
    https://tamrieltraveller.wordpress.com/

    Crafting bag OP! ZOS nerf pls!
  • Guarlet
    Guarlet
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    DanteYoda wrote: »
    Crown crates are illegal and will need to go.

    Lol, they are not illegal and they will not go.
    AKA The Goblinator, PC/EU
  • Zordrage
    Zordrage
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Illurian wrote: »
    Dragath wrote: »
    crown crates are gambling in belgium, the ruling is clear on that part.
    a much more important question is, how will germany rule on that front, because germany is the big player in the EU.
    their ruling will most likely decide the future of loot boxes in europe.



    If this ruling is taken seriously, I could see ZOS simply removing crown crates from the EU servers entirely. I just hope in this scenario that they would at least add the crown crate items to the crown store. (But imagine the uproar that would cause!)

    Uproar ?

    man people would make Parties and Raise Statues in the name of ZOS if they would do that... people would finally could Directly buy what they want from a HUGE collection in the store instead of gambling...

    and no SANE person cares about those people that spend hundreds to thousands of Euro on these boxes to get something.. they are the ones they supported this crap gambling system to begin with... and if they have so much money to throw away like this they will be fine afterwards anyway...
    Edited by Zordrage on May 1, 2018 3:32PM
  • Dragath
    Dragath
    ✭✭✭✭
    Illurian wrote: »
    Dragath wrote: »
    crown crates are gambling in belgium, the ruling is clear on that part.
    a much more important question is, how will germany rule on that front, because germany is the big player in the EU.
    their ruling will most likely decide the future of loot boxes in europe.

    That's fair, and especially if the entire EU rules lootboxes as illegal, we might see some change.

    But how will/can ZOS approach this ruling? Removing the sale of crown crates from Belgium consumers? How does that work? Is it even possible?

    If this ruling is taken seriously, I could see ZOS simply removing crown crates from the EU servers entirely. I just hope in this scenario that they would at least add the crown crate items to the crown store. (But imagine the uproar that would cause!)

    there are several ways to go about it, depending on what the governments in the specific countries want/decide to be necessary.
    there are already a lot of cases where games had to cater to specifics in regards to games for certain countries.
    could be an ip login check, could be your residency in your account info, etc.
    removing crown crates for belgian players alone wouldn't be a big deal. having to remove crown crates for all or most of the eu would force them to change their approach on making money and could possibly lead to putting all those items for regular sale in the crown store.
  • Sawzallz
    Sawzallz
    ✭✭✭
    Here's my opinion on loot crates and such cod has been doing it before ea, so to me ea did nothing wrong. Second i been playing ww2 a lot and noticed that they have guns in the crates you can use only if you got it from a crate however everyday they have tons of stuff to do to get the gun you want without paying for it or gamble for it also you can get the supply drops while playing the game, while you guys are going to say it's just cosmetic
  • Potenza
    Potenza
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Its done in Belguim, not the United States. So I don't see how it matters or applies to us.
  • Cadbury
    Cadbury
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Potenza wrote: »
    Its done in Belguim, not the United States. So I don't see how it matters or applies to us.

    Because this could affect the cost and transport of Belgium waffles in the U.S.
    "If a person is truly desirous of something, perhaps being set on fire does not seem so bad."
  • Princess_Ciri
    Princess_Ciri
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ugh this is so clickbaity and full of ignorance on how European law works. A gaming commission and 1 justice minister does not mean ZOS are going to jail for loot boxes or crown crates are going to be banned on the EU servers. Pls stop.
    GM and raid leader of Hot Girls Play DPS, the cutest guild EU
  • badmojo
    badmojo
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Isnt ZOS just going to do what 'adult imagry' does and put a "Are you 18 years old?" prompt before the purchase of crates?

    I just dont see why some people are cheering these decisions as our saving grace. You think posting odds is going to force ZOS to abandon their monitization strategy? Only reason they dont post odds is to avoid all the crying posts when they adjust the odds from season to season.
    Edited by badmojo on May 1, 2018 4:05PM
    [DC/NA]
This discussion has been closed.