Maintenance for the week of April 6:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – April 6

Question about guild trader politics

Saucy_Jack
Saucy_Jack
✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭
Ok, so here's a scenario:

Guild A has a decent trader in a decent spot. They do good business.
Guild B has a decent trader in the same decent spot. They also do good business.

At max, Guild A can sell (500*30 = 15000) things at any one time. Guild B can do the same.

Yet I've observed multiple instances where guilds try to "take out" other guilds. Why? What's the point? Regardless of whether Guild B is there or not, Guild A can still only list 15000 things at any one time. So what's the point of malicious behaviour towards Guild B?
ALL HAIL SNUGGLORR THE MAGNIFICENT, KING OF THE RNG AND NIRN'S ONE TRUE GOD! Also, become a Scrub-scriber! SJ Scrubs: Playing games badly to make you feel better about yourself.
  • Cpt_Teemo
    Cpt_Teemo
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    Competition and that's just how crapped up this *** hole of a economy turned out
  • Danikat
    Danikat
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Because if Guild B is also a serious trading guild they're likely to be listing many of the same/similar items to Guild A, and potential customers are likely to check both traders before making a purchase. So then the two guilds are competing with each others.

    Whereas if Guild B is driven off and (ideally for A) the other trader is empty/held by a fake guild that will never list anything, or held by a guild that's not serious about trading and whose members just list whatever they want to get rid of people in that area who want high value items have to buy from Guild A and they can charge pretty much what they like for it.
    PC EU player | She/her/hers | PAWS (Positively Against Wrip-off Stuff) - Say No to Crown Crates!

    "Remember in this game we call life that no one said it's fair"
  • Saucy_Jack
    Saucy_Jack
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    But it still seems odd to me; I mean, let's assume that both guilds list a lot of the same stuff. Guild A lists for 10k; Guild B lists for 9.5k.

    If Guild A wants the sale, they can turn around and relist for 9k, thus taking what amounts to a 1k hit, ORRRRR they can use a fajillion bajillion gold in a junk guild so that it can finance a high-enough bid to win Guild B's trader in the decent spot.

    Of course, this is all predicated on the idea that players will always go to Guild B for the sale; the volume of players through decent trader spots basically ensures that if the item's popular enough, it'll sell anyway at the higher price as well.

    I'm not seeing how if the goal is "increased sales" (read: increased gold influx) that this goal is achieved by dumping a ton of gold into a junk guild to finance a high bid for a popular trader. It seems incredibly counter productive.

    Not to mention that with the amount of players who check items/prices on TTC, if they want the cheapest price they'll just go get the cheapest price.

    I guess it just seems like a way to be jerks without getting really any benefit from it in the long run. I mean, I don't advocate being a jerk even if there IS a benefit, but certainly being a jerk for minimal benefit is an even more jerky thing to do.
    ALL HAIL SNUGGLORR THE MAGNIFICENT, KING OF THE RNG AND NIRN'S ONE TRUE GOD! Also, become a Scrub-scriber! SJ Scrubs: Playing games badly to make you feel better about yourself.
  • Juju_beans
    Juju_beans
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's all about knocking out the competition so that everyone will buy from the guild that got their trader.

    Lots of players rely on guild trading for their spending money. When stuff doesn't move they don't make sales.
  • code65536
    code65536
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    The problem with knocking out competition is that it devalues the location. A trader city is only as good as the guilds there, and if you drive out a good guild and put a scrub dummy guild in that location (which would appear to be a somewhat regular event in Rawl on PC/NA), it might feel awesome, but you're really just devaluing the real estate that you yourself paid for.

    That the guilds make the location is why EU and NA have different trading hubs--Belkarth for EU and Rawl'kha for NA. It's why Belkarth on NA fell on hard times over 2 years ago, when the main attraction in Belkarth moved.

    So why do guilds do this? Not for their members, because their members don't give a rat's posterior about stuff like this--they just want to be in a place to sell. It's more of a matter of pride and ego of the guild's leadership. This is economic PvP. They want to "win", even if "winning" is nonsensical and even detrimental to their members. Not to mention expensive.
    Edited by code65536 on March 14, 2018 12:17AM
    Nightfighters ― PC/NA and PC/EU

    Dungeons and Trials:
    Personal best scores:
    Dungeon trifectas:
    PC/Console Add-Ons: Combat AlertsGroup Buff Panels
    Media: YouTubeTwitch
  • Saucy_Jack
    Saucy_Jack
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, but couldn't "times when stuff doesn't move" be chalked up to outside forces? I mean, we just had a double node event that lasted a week. Prices for those mats are down as a result. So if I'm still listing at pre-event prices and stuff's not moving, I can hardly blame another guild; I CAN blame myself for not responding reasonably to market forces.
    ALL HAIL SNUGGLORR THE MAGNIFICENT, KING OF THE RNG AND NIRN'S ONE TRUE GOD! Also, become a Scrub-scriber! SJ Scrubs: Playing games badly to make you feel better about yourself.
  • Saucy_Jack
    Saucy_Jack
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    @code65536 - yeah, that's exactly what I'm getting at.

    Imagine we're talking about, say, Wayrest. It's a capital city, lots of traffic, seven traders in the main hub.

    Let's say Guild A wants more sales in that location, and spends the huge amount of gold to knock out another guild, so there's less competition; now there's Guild A, five other actual trading guilds, and one junk guild.

    Let's take it to the logical conclusion, and imagine a hypothetical where Guild A has spent the resources to knock out ALL the other six guilds, so that in the main hub, so now it's only Guild A with relatively high prices, plus 6 junk guilds.

    After the first visit to Wayrest that week - after spending allll those resources so that they're the only game in town - does Guild A expect shoppers to continue shopping in that hub when their only choices are one guild with relatively high-priced listings, and six other junk guilds with five total listings each? No one would continue shopping there; at that point Wayrest would have completely lost its value as a good trader spot.

    So again, this actively trying to take out other guilds just seems like a case where guild leadership is a little too deep in their corporate intrigue roleplay.
    ALL HAIL SNUGGLORR THE MAGNIFICENT, KING OF THE RNG AND NIRN'S ONE TRUE GOD! Also, become a Scrub-scriber! SJ Scrubs: Playing games badly to make you feel better about yourself.
  • Nihility42
    Nihility42
    ✭✭✭✭
    Sometimes it's more complicated than just trying to take out the competition. Something I've seen before is an outside guild trying to break into a high competition location. They will do some and sometime that will push the guild that they displaced to take a different spot (if that guild is worried that the bid for their old spot will be too competitive or risky with the newcomer trying to get their spot). This recently happened in Rawl'kha on PCNA. An outside guild took a very established guild's spot. The two weeks since then they've taken other established traders spots, presumably in order to be unpredictable so that the newcomer guild can't try to push them out. Ends up being a lot of collateral damage though.
  • MLGProPlayer
    MLGProPlayer
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Saucy_Jack wrote: »
    Ok, so here's a scenario:

    Guild A has a decent trader in a decent spot. They do good business.
    Guild B has a decent trader in the same decent spot. They also do good business.

    At max, Guild A can sell (500*30 = 15000) things at any one time. Guild B can do the same.

    Yet I've observed multiple instances where guilds try to "take out" other guilds. Why? What's the point? Regardless of whether Guild B is there or not, Guild A can still only list 15000 things at any one time. So what's the point of malicious behaviour towards Guild B?

    It's stupid since you waste your own guild funds trying to kick another guild out of their spot, with absolutely no benefit to your guild.
  • BuddyAces
    BuddyAces
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Saucy_Jack wrote: »
    Ok, so here's a scenario:

    Guild A has a decent trader in a decent spot. They do good business.
    Guild B has a decent trader in the same decent spot. They also do good business.

    At max, Guild A can sell (500*30 = 15000) things at any one time. Guild B can do the same.

    Yet I've observed multiple instances where guilds try to "take out" other guilds. Why? What's the point? Regardless of whether Guild B is there or not, Guild A can still only list 15000 things at any one time. So what's the point of malicious behaviour towards Guild B?

    It's stupid since you waste your own guild funds trying to kick another guild out of their spot, with absolutely no benefit to your guild.

    Apparently if you use a ghost guild and bid on a trader and win that trader, then disband, you will receive all your gold that you bid on that trader back. This opens up the trader slot so guild A can come buy it for something like 10k. That's the gist of it I got from another thread where someone from the ps4 community was yelling about.
    They nerfed magsorcs so hard stamsorcs felt it,lol - Somber97866

    I'm blown away by the utter stupidity I see here on the daily. - Wrekkedd
Sign In or Register to comment.