Maintenance for the week of August 31:
· [COMPLETE] NA megaservers for maintenance – August 31, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] EU megaservers for maintenance – August 31, 8:00 UTC (4:00AM EDT) - 16:00 UTC (12:00PM EDT)
· [COMPLETE] ESO Store and Account System for maintenance – August 31, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] NA megaservers for maintenance – August 31, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] EU megaservers for maintenance – August 31, 8:00 UTC (4:00AM EDT) - 16:00 UTC (12:00PM EDT)
· [COMPLETE] ESO Store and Account System for maintenance – August 31, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
The maintenance is complete, and the PTS is now back online and patch 12.1.4 is available.
Why not make Home Storage per Home?
Willard
✭✭✭
Why not make Home Storage per Home? As it is now, unless you just want to collect each house or decorate--there is no real incentive to purchase additional homes. They look great but they provide no real benefit to ownership.
As it stands now, I will not be purchasing any additional homes! However, if each home provided additional storage I would absolutely buy more homes. Wouldn't this be a plus for Crown Store sales.. I seriously do not understand the logic of having the storage chests not tied into Home size and available per house.
As it stands now, I will not be purchasing any additional homes! However, if each home provided additional storage I would absolutely buy more homes. Wouldn't this be a plus for Crown Store sales.. I seriously do not understand the logic of having the storage chests not tied into Home size and available per house.
0
-
ecki2k✭Easy.
More Storage per House -> buy quite some houses with ingame gold and have enough storage space to ->
unsub because you don´t need the crafting bag no more.0 -
idk✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭It would lead to unlimited storage which would mean less need for the bank and personal storage.
It should have been obvious that the storage would not be virtually unlimited as OP seems to suggest.0 -
Taleof2Cities✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Easy.
More Storage per House -> buy quite some houses with ingame gold and have enough storage space to ->
unsub because you don´t need the crafting bag no more.
Not only is the OP's idea bad for this reason, but the game provides nearly 4,000 inventory slots already ... not including the crafting bag or stacked inventory.
Inventory slots add up when you talk about 15 characters, bag and bank space, mount upgrades, and now 360 slots of housing storage.0 -
Haquor✭✭✭✭✭They dont want our money and they are prioritising other things (we dont need to know about) over logical development and game feature decisions.0
-
victoriana-blue✭✭✭✭I like that the contents of the containers are shared across houses - I won't have to remember if I put my IA jewellery in Jungle House or Velothi Reverie, because I would be able to access it from both.
ETA: That said, I'd be all for a system that upped your possible max containers based on the numbers and sizes of the houses you own.Edited by victoriana-blue on January 15, 2018 3:43AMCP 750+
Never enough inventory space, even with storage coffers and a mule account2 -
Taleof2Cities✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭They dont want our money and they are prioritising other things (we dont need to know about) over logical development and game feature decisions.
I know it's a convenience factor for some.
But, I'd rather spend in-game vouchers, tel var, or gold (to buy master writs) ... than pay real life money for rudimentary housing storage.0