Reading discussions about limiting group sizes in Cyrodiil to 6 or 8 or 10, or pretty much turn Cyrodiil into small scale pvp.
In game. Mounts coming to a complete stand still when riding over a tiny pebble on a road somewhere.
The horrible jumping mechanics.
tinythinker wrote: »Reading discussions about limiting group sizes in Cyrodiil to 6 or 8 or 10, or pretty much turn Cyrodiil into small scale pvp.
In game. Mounts coming to a complete stand still when riding over a tiny pebble on a road somewhere.
The horrible jumping mechanics.
The mounts still do that? Haven't had that happen since they patched it a year or two ago, my mounts usually even roll over fences now. Sorry to hear it isn't totally fixed.
Waffennacht wrote: »tinythinker wrote: »Waffennacht wrote: »I don't see how getting hit outside of a red circle wouldn't make any upset
This was a problem at PC launch but they worked to fix it. I hadn't heard that the issue is back outside of lag. Are you on PC or Console? Anyway, yeah, that sucks. Had the same problem in another MMORPG until I learned that there was an intentional partial disconnect between in the telegraph and the effect, so you had to learn to adjust your timing.
Xbox, seems every update it appears for a bit
I don’t. It has always confused me why people get so frustrated when playing games though. If you’re not having fun, why are you even playing....
gethemshauna wrote: »When I got killed in Imperial City prison having 10k+ telvar stones.
tinythinker wrote: »tinythinker wrote: »tinythinker wrote: »fgoron2000 wrote: »it may not be in-game, but polls on this forum that so frequently omit having an "Other" option...and I may not rage about it, but it certainly is an annoyance for those of us who participate in the forum here
I often do, but sometimes I'm trying to get people to commit to one of the specific options.
Whilst denying them the opportunity to put forward some other problem, or none.
If you're so confident that people are raging over the issues that you're raising, why deny them the opportunity to say otherwise? A biased poll is a biased poll, whichever way you look at it, and the reason that frustrates players is because it means that the devs need take no notice of the valid concerns it could have raised, they can just dismiss it out of hand because of the obvious bias.
People are already putting additional things in posts, which are being acknowledged.
But let me ask you something:
What is your purpose in this thread? You claim in a thread about what people rage over that the game is fine and you never rage (not raging is perfectly fine) and imply people who get upset playing a game are throwing a tantrum (which is insulting), and now you are being confrontational over the options in the poll for a thread about something you disagree with.
I mean, are you just here to argue? I'm not interested in that.
This thread lets people admit that they get upset sometimes and give a reason why without focusing on a particular issue, hence helping it from breaking down into a bitter fight over a single topic which is the usual MO. I also have a thread about what compliments people have been giving/would like to give the game as well for those who don't like this one
I'm not here to argue at all, you're the one arguing with my original comment. I'm simply pointing out that if you give people a fixed option to say they're raging about one of a few specific things and no other options then the result is meaningless to the devs. If you give them the additional option to vote for some other problem or to say that they have no problems and most players still vote for the same problem then the devs can pick up on that.
You say some people get upset (I agree) and that this poll enables people to "give a reason why without focusing on a particular issue" but that is precisely my point - it doesn't, it requires them to focus on one of the particular issues that you have selected.
No, not doing this dance. The poll is what it is, people are still posting additional things. Thanks for your input.
tinythinker wrote: »tinythinker wrote: »tinythinker wrote: »fgoron2000 wrote: »it may not be in-game, but polls on this forum that so frequently omit having an "Other" option...and I may not rage about it, but it certainly is an annoyance for those of us who participate in the forum here
I often do, but sometimes I'm trying to get people to commit to one of the specific options.
Whilst denying them the opportunity to put forward some other problem, or none.
If you're so confident that people are raging over the issues that you're raising, why deny them the opportunity to say otherwise? A biased poll is a biased poll, whichever way you look at it, and the reason that frustrates players is because it means that the devs need take no notice of the valid concerns it could have raised, they can just dismiss it out of hand because of the obvious bias.
People are already putting additional things in posts, which are being acknowledged.
But let me ask you something:
What is your purpose in this thread? You claim in a thread about what people rage over that the game is fine and you never rage (not raging is perfectly fine) and imply people who get upset playing a game are throwing a tantrum (which is insulting), and now you are being confrontational over the options in the poll for a thread about something you disagree with.
I mean, are you just here to argue? I'm not interested in that.
This thread lets people admit that they get upset sometimes and give a reason why without focusing on a particular issue, hence helping it from breaking down into a bitter fight over a single topic which is the usual MO. I also have a thread about what compliments people have been giving/would like to give the game as well for those who don't like this one
I'm not here to argue at all, you're the one arguing with my original comment. I'm simply pointing out that if you give people a fixed option to say they're raging about one of a few specific things and no other options then the result is meaningless to the devs. If you give them the additional option to vote for some other problem or to say that they have no problems and most players still vote for the same problem then the devs can pick up on that.
You say some people get upset (I agree) and that this poll enables people to "give a reason why without focusing on a particular issue" but that is precisely my point - it doesn't, it requires them to focus on one of the particular issues that you have selected.
No, not doing this dance. The poll is what it is, people are still posting additional things. Thanks for your input.
That's fine, like I said I'm not here to argue.
May I respectfully suggest then that when the discussion looks like it has run its course, you add a final post (or preferably an amendment to your opening one if that option is still open to you) collating the other concerns people have raised. That way the devs can pick up on the dominant issues without having to read through the whole thread.
tinythinker wrote: »Reading discussions about limiting group sizes in Cyrodiil to 6 or 8 or 10, or pretty much turn Cyrodiil into small scale pvp.
In game. Mounts coming to a complete stand still when riding over a tiny pebble on a road somewhere.
The horrible jumping mechanics.
The mounts still do that? Haven't had that happen since they patched it a year or two ago, my mounts usually even roll over fences now. Sorry to hear it isn't totally fixed.
Yes. Mounts still do that.
tinythinker wrote: »tinythinker wrote: »Reading discussions about limiting group sizes in Cyrodiil to 6 or 8 or 10, or pretty much turn Cyrodiil into small scale pvp.
In game. Mounts coming to a complete stand still when riding over a tiny pebble on a road somewhere.
The horrible jumping mechanics.
The mounts still do that? Haven't had that happen since they patched it a year or two ago, my mounts usually even roll over fences now. Sorry to hear it isn't totally fixed.
Yes. Mounts still do that.
PC or console?
tinythinker wrote: »I don’t. It has always confused me why people get so frustrated when playing games though. If you’re not having fun, why are you even playing....
People enjoy things in different ways. Some examples of why people rage:
1. easily irritable (personality, blood sugar, displacement of stress, etc.)
2. immaturity (haven't learned skills and acquired perspective necessary to deal with disappointment)
3. competitive (they really get into something and this is reflected in various forms of strong emotional response)
So, for example, you may love the game and enjoy it but are having a bad day (#1), or still haven't grown up (#2), or are just really "into it" and may be cheering one minutes and yelling "Noooooo!" the next (#3).
Not everyone will respond in these ways, but some people do.
tinythinker wrote: »I don’t. It has always confused me why people get so frustrated when playing games though. If you’re not having fun, why are you even playing....
People enjoy things in different ways. Some examples of why people rage:
1. easily irritable (personality, blood sugar, displacement of stress, etc.)
2. immaturity (haven't learned skills and acquired perspective necessary to deal with disappointment)
3. competitive (they really get into something and this is reflected in various forms of strong emotional response)
So, for example, you may love the game and enjoy it but are having a bad day (#1), or still haven't grown up (#2), or are just really "into it" and may be cheering one minutes and yelling "Noooooo!" the next (#3).
Not everyone will respond in these ways, but some people do.
Yeah true.
For me personally though, even if I’m doing something very competitive and lose (wiping at 1% last boss vHoF HM in Morrowind -_-) or get rekt in PvP because I Streaked into a load screen, I never get angry.
Back when I played CoD (I was that guy winning every game easily in free-for-all lol) I would always hear people rage over their mics. When I did fail to place #1 or lost games it never bothered me at all.
You’re absolutely right that people handle this stuff differently. If I ever raged hard at a game I’d question why I was playing at all.
Mettaricana wrote: »Last night me and wife had a pug group for vet cradle we cleared kelphiden but once we got to dranos we realized these lvl 690 players dont know wth bashing is and no matter how much we told them to do it they couldn't put together a braincell between them to bash the shadows at all... 20 wipes later we bailed waste of repair kits
Bow light attack/snipe spammers will be the eventual cause of my inevitable hypertension. I've lost track of the number of times I've had to do most of the DPS (and sometimes most of the tanking!) in normal dungeons while trying to get better at healing on my Warden.No amount of patient explanation helps these players. I don't even care that they don't have Caltrops -- FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, USE ENDLESS HAIL OR SOMETHING.
transGemini wrote: »Dying for the umpteenth time when trying to kill a boss, requesting help from the zone and receiving none, then to have someone come in and kill the boss when I'm "regenerating" so I can't help!
Also frustrating (but not raging) is the chat vocab. Is there a dictionary somewhere I can look what all the acronyms and codes mean?! It baffles me sometimes what the zone chat is about...
tinythinker wrote: »transGemini wrote: »Dying for the umpteenth time when trying to kill a boss, requesting help from the zone and receiving none, then to have someone come in and kill the boss when I'm "regenerating" so I can't help!
Also frustrating (but not raging) is the chat vocab. Is there a dictionary somewhere I can look what all the acronyms and codes mean?! It baffles me sometimes what the zone chat is about...
Was very confusing for me as well when I started ESO (my first real attempt at an MMORPG).
This might help some:
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/136290/the-eso-slang-and-abbreviation-dictionary/p1
disintegr8 wrote: »People who use group/dungeon finder for normal dungeons but once they get a dungeon/group, they run the dungeon as an individual.
I don't give a fat rats who you are, how many CP you have or how good you (think you) are - of you are not prepared to progress with the group, do your specific role, or intend to charge into fights ahead of the group, stay the heck away from group/dungeon finder.
transGemini wrote: »tinythinker wrote: »transGemini wrote: »Dying for the umpteenth time when trying to kill a boss, requesting help from the zone and receiving none, then to have someone come in and kill the boss when I'm "regenerating" so I can't help!
Also frustrating (but not raging) is the chat vocab. Is there a dictionary somewhere I can look what all the acronyms and codes mean?! It baffles me sometimes what the zone chat is about...
Was very confusing for me as well when I started ESO (my first real attempt at an MMORPG).
This might help some:
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/136290/the-eso-slang-and-abbreviation-dictionary/p1
Thank you so much!