static_recharge wrote: »Just because there's a placeholder for it doesn't mean it's going to get released.
But more possible than if it wouldn't have placeholder.
What? I thought every magicka build in heavy armor was a battlemage?
But why bother with that, when I could have the SUPER DUPER CLASS! Not to be confused with the slightly weaker SUPER CLASS which has less DUPER.
I guess we now know which class is going to get a buffed up blazing shield+ blinding flashes...
LukosCreyden wrote: »Screw Battlemage.
i want the Warrior.
Give me Warrior.
I can't imagine they'd actually waste people's time with such a thing. unless they plan on introducing some form of "advanced classes"? Like what SWTOR has.
A Sorc is a pure Mage though, period. A BattleMage is a Melee Spell Slinger, which even a StamSorc isn't since barely a handful of Sorc Skills have Stamina morphs, and only two are ever used, Armaments and Hurricane.
A BattleMage could be a pure DPS Class, with trees full of damage skills that have both Magic and Stamina Morphs but still act like destruction spells.
A Sorc is a pure Mage though, period. A BattleMage is a Melee Spell Slinger, which even a StamSorc isn't since barely a handful of Sorc Skills have Stamina morphs, and only two are ever used, Armaments and Hurricane.
A BattleMage could be a pure DPS Class, with trees full of damage skills that have both Magic and Stamina Morphs but still act like destruction spells.
^ This may be true. However. Mag sorc dual wielding swords, literally is a battle mage even if it isn't utilizing stam abilities. There's just nothing else to call it.
But this 'new class' does have enough room to significantly differentiate itself, that is likely true.