Why is Igneous Weapons the only class source of Major Brutality that does nothing else for you, and is also the most expensive?
Gandrhulf_Harbard wrote: »Why is Igneous Weapons the only class source of Major Brutality that does nothing else for you, and is also the most expensive?
Because back in the day DK was so OP that the forums were full of salty whines about how and why almost every DK skill had to be nerfed; and ZOS has a long and proud history of listening to the whiners - especially PvP whiners.
All The Best
Gandrhulf_Harbard wrote: »Why is Igneous Weapons the only class source of Major Brutality that does nothing else for you, and is also the most expensive?
Because back in the day DK was so OP that the forums were full of salty whines about how and why almost every DK skill had to be nerfed; and ZOS has a long and proud history of listening to the whiners - especially PvP whiners.
All The Best
GeorgeBlack wrote: »I saw one "it's fine as it is" answer so far?
Who has the nerve to support this view?
Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »I saw one "it's fine as it is" answer so far?
Who has the nerve to support this view?
because the only people that ought to take this morph is a tank that want to make sure the group has the buff, otherwise both stam and mag dks take the other morph, the one that does 40% more heavy attack damage and still run pots for the buff. it is really not that hard of a concept.
Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »I saw one "it's fine as it is" answer so far?
Who has the nerve to support this view?
because the only people that ought to take this morph is a tank that want to make sure the group has the buff, otherwise both stam and mag dks take the other morph, the one that does 40% more heavy attack damage and still run pots for the buff. it is really not that hard of a concept.
Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »I saw one "it's fine as it is" answer so far?
Who has the nerve to support this view?
because the only people that ought to take this morph is a tank that want to make sure the group has the buff, otherwise both stam and mag dks take the other morph, the one that does 40% more heavy attack damage and still run pots for the buff. it is really not that hard of a concept.
Pots are pricey and my crafter sucks at alchemy, so its Igneous Weapons for me.
GeorgeBlack wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »I saw one "it's fine as it is" answer so far?
Who has the nerve to support this view?
because the only people that ought to take this morph is a tank that want to make sure the group has the buff, otherwise both stam and mag dks take the other morph, the one that does 40% more heavy attack damage and still run pots for the buff. it is really not that hard of a concept.
Oh ye?
Give the heavy atk bonus to Igneous weapon.
Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »I saw one "it's fine as it is" answer so far?
Who has the nerve to support this view?
because the only people that ought to take this morph is a tank that want to make sure the group has the buff, otherwise both stam and mag dks take the other morph, the one that does 40% more heavy attack damage and still run pots for the buff. it is really not that hard of a concept.
Pots are pricey and my crafter sucks at alchemy, so its Igneous Weapons for me.
if you want to save pots then use one of the weapon skills with Molten Armaments, why is that a problem? i use rally all the time on my stam dk for that reason, so cheapness is not an excuse.GeorgeBlack wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »I saw one "it's fine as it is" answer so far?
Who has the nerve to support this view?
because the only people that ought to take this morph is a tank that want to make sure the group has the buff, otherwise both stam and mag dks take the other morph, the one that does 40% more heavy attack damage and still run pots for the buff. it is really not that hard of a concept.
Oh ye?
Give the heavy atk bonus to Igneous weapon.
oh YE!
just use one of the weapon abilities, if you are a a bow/bow build, this is not a problem.
GeorgeBlack wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »I saw one "it's fine as it is" answer so far?
Who has the nerve to support this view?
because the only people that ought to take this morph is a tank that want to make sure the group has the buff, otherwise both stam and mag dks take the other morph, the one that does 40% more heavy attack damage and still run pots for the buff. it is really not that hard of a concept.
Pots are pricey and my crafter sucks at alchemy, so its Igneous Weapons for me.
if you want to save pots then use one of the weapon skills with Molten Armaments, why is that a problem? i use rally all the time on my stam dk for that reason, so cheapness is not an excuse.GeorgeBlack wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »I saw one "it's fine as it is" answer so far?
Who has the nerve to support this view?
because the only people that ought to take this morph is a tank that want to make sure the group has the buff, otherwise both stam and mag dks take the other morph, the one that does 40% more heavy attack damage and still run pots for the buff. it is really not that hard of a concept.
Oh ye?
Give the heavy atk bonus to Igneous weapon.
oh YE!
just use one of the weapon abilities, if you are a a bow/bow build, this is not a problem.
Bs answer. U are a careless troll.
Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »I saw one "it's fine as it is" answer so far?
Who has the nerve to support this view?
because the only people that ought to take this morph is a tank that want to make sure the group has the buff, otherwise both stam and mag dks take the other morph, the one that does 40% more heavy attack damage and still run pots for the buff. it is really not that hard of a concept.
Pots are pricey and my crafter sucks at alchemy, so its Igneous Weapons for me.
if you want to save pots then use one of the weapon skills with Molten Armaments, why is that a problem? i use rally all the time on my stam dk for that reason, so cheapness is not an excuse.GeorgeBlack wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »I saw one "it's fine as it is" answer so far?
Who has the nerve to support this view?
because the only people that ought to take this morph is a tank that want to make sure the group has the buff, otherwise both stam and mag dks take the other morph, the one that does 40% more heavy attack damage and still run pots for the buff. it is really not that hard of a concept.
Oh ye?
Give the heavy atk bonus to Igneous weapon.
oh YE!
just use one of the weapon abilities, if you are a a bow/bow build, this is not a problem.
Bs answer. U are a careless troll.
Bs complaint, you are helpless whiner.
GeorgeBlack wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »I saw one "it's fine as it is" answer so far?
Who has the nerve to support this view?
because the only people that ought to take this morph is a tank that want to make sure the group has the buff, otherwise both stam and mag dks take the other morph, the one that does 40% more heavy attack damage and still run pots for the buff. it is really not that hard of a concept.
Pots are pricey and my crafter sucks at alchemy, so its Igneous Weapons for me.
if you want to save pots then use one of the weapon skills with Molten Armaments, why is that a problem? i use rally all the time on my stam dk for that reason, so cheapness is not an excuse.GeorgeBlack wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »I saw one "it's fine as it is" answer so far?
Who has the nerve to support this view?
because the only people that ought to take this morph is a tank that want to make sure the group has the buff, otherwise both stam and mag dks take the other morph, the one that does 40% more heavy attack damage and still run pots for the buff. it is really not that hard of a concept.
Oh ye?
Give the heavy atk bonus to Igneous weapon.
oh YE!
just use one of the weapon abilities, if you are a a bow/bow build, this is not a problem.
Bs answer. U are a careless troll.
Bs complaint, you are helpless whiner.
Not for too much longer. Btw none of my complaints have been implemented. Except for buff to DW and HA.
You on the other hand seem to be traumatised and spiteful since the op DK days.
Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »I saw one "it's fine as it is" answer so far?
Who has the nerve to support this view?
because the only people that ought to take this morph is a tank that want to make sure the group has the buff, otherwise both stam and mag dks take the other morph, the one that does 40% more heavy attack damage and still run pots for the buff. it is really not that hard of a concept.
Pots are pricey and my crafter sucks at alchemy, so its Igneous Weapons for me.
if you want to save pots then use one of the weapon skills with Molten Armaments, why is that a problem? i use rally all the time on my stam dk for that reason, so cheapness is not an excuse.GeorgeBlack wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »I saw one "it's fine as it is" answer so far?
Who has the nerve to support this view?
because the only people that ought to take this morph is a tank that want to make sure the group has the buff, otherwise both stam and mag dks take the other morph, the one that does 40% more heavy attack damage and still run pots for the buff. it is really not that hard of a concept.
Oh ye?
Give the heavy atk bonus to Igneous weapon.
oh YE!
just use one of the weapon abilities, if you are not a bow/bow build, this is not a problem.
Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »I saw one "it's fine as it is" answer so far?
Who has the nerve to support this view?
because the only people that ought to take this morph is a tank that want to make sure the group has the buff, otherwise both stam and mag dks take the other morph, the one that does 40% more heavy attack damage and still run pots for the buff. it is really not that hard of a concept.
Pots are pricey and my crafter sucks at alchemy, so its Igneous Weapons for me.
if you want to save pots then use one of the weapon skills with Molten Armaments, why is that a problem? i use rally all the time on my stam dk for that reason, so cheapness is not an excuse.GeorgeBlack wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »I saw one "it's fine as it is" answer so far?
Who has the nerve to support this view?
because the only people that ought to take this morph is a tank that want to make sure the group has the buff, otherwise both stam and mag dks take the other morph, the one that does 40% more heavy attack damage and still run pots for the buff. it is really not that hard of a concept.
Oh ye?
Give the heavy atk bonus to Igneous weapon.
oh YE!
just use one of the weapon abilities, if you are not a bow/bow build, this is not a problem.
Because i have better skills on my attack bar than hidden dagger.
GeorgeBlack wrote: »Omg.
So you dont pvp. You've played DK with a 2h(big deal), but you are so quick to talk crap.
Public forums at it's best.
Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »GeorgeBlack wrote: »Omg.
So you dont pvp. You've played DK with a 2h(big deal), but you are so quick to talk crap.
Public forums at it's best.
you are such a cutie, you are the one that name called first, ie "Bs answer. U are a careless troll." i respond in kind and you get all huffy. typical whiny behavior.
Gandrhulf_Harbard wrote: »Why is Igneous Weapons the only class source of Major Brutality that does nothing else for you, and is also the most expensive?
Because back in the day DK was so OP that the forums were full of salty whines about how and why almost every DK skill had to be nerfed; and ZOS has a long and proud history of listening to the whiners - especially PvP whiners.
All The Best