SydneyGrey wrote: »Yes they do. A lot of people like me do BOTH PvP and PvE, and since we can only have one morph, we chose Eye of the Storm. Also, many people just like the fact that EotS moves with your character, which is useful for a lot of battles.Nobody uses Eye of the Storm in any PvE content.
Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Nerfing damage in a PVP tank meta is bad . Did they nerf tanks ? More specifically the perma block tanks as they are the only real issue I had , not the tanky damage dealers . If not this nerf is just going to drag out fights even longer and I think that is dull and boring in PVP .
I think slot of the nerfs ZOS puts out should be handled through battle spirit. Too many of them *** up PVE when their intended for PVP.
GrumpyDuckling wrote: »Love the nerf. It probably won't stop Eye from overperforming, though.
The bigger problem is allowing Eye to be paired with immovable potions.
They make a change that people actually asked for and complaints still roll in on the Forumsrip
People use EotS in PVE? I thought Elemental Rage was preferred in dungeons and trials, because the tank keeps the boss you're burning down stationary? Mind you, I haven't set foot in a dungeon in ages since I'm either soloing or in Cyrodiil these days, so I could be wrong.
In vma it's good for some instances
People use EotS in PVE? I thought Elemental Rage was preferred in dungeons and trials, because the tank keeps the boss you're burning down stationary? Mind you, I haven't set foot in a dungeon in ages since I'm either soloing or in Cyrodiil these days, so I could be wrong.
In vma it's good for some instances
Not even. Elemental rage is vastly superior.
chaserstorm16909 wrote: »If they were going to balance pve and pvp separately they would've done it long ago. It is probably too difficult from a developer's standpoint.
People use EotS in PVE? I thought Elemental Rage was preferred in dungeons and trials, because the tank keeps the boss you're burning down stationary? Mind you, I haven't set foot in a dungeon in ages since I'm either soloing or in Cyrodiil these days, so I could be wrong.
chaserstorm16909 wrote: »If they were going to balance pve and pvp separately they would've done it long ago. It is probably too difficult from management's standpoint.
They should rename it to "rain of tears" and dedicate it to the posters on the forums.

People use EotS in PVE? I thought Elemental Rage was preferred in dungeons and trials, because the tank keeps the boss you're burning down stationary? Mind you, I haven't set foot in a dungeon in ages since I'm either soloing or in Cyrodiil these days, so I could be wrong.
In vma it's good for some instances
DRXHarbinger wrote: »12% isn't actually a lot for an ult especially before buffs tbf. Eots still hoovered up zergs and 12% won't change anything.
Only real change is vamps will see the difference in incoming damage from it..slightly.
Pts: Elemental Storm: Reduced the damage of this ability and the Eye of the Storm morph by approximately 12%. The damage on the Elemental Rage morph remains unchanged.
What it should have looked like:Elemental Storm: Reduced the damage of this ability and the Eye of the Storm morph by approximately 12% WHILE IN CYRODIL. The damage on the Elemental Rage morph remains unchanged.
Whoo how to separate pvp and pve! Send them insightfuls and agrees my way bois
Edit: while I don't use this morph much in pve except vma, is 12 percent actually enough on the pvp side?
People use EotS in PVE? I thought Elemental Rage was preferred in dungeons and trials, because the tank keeps the boss you're burning down stationary? Mind you, I haven't set foot in a dungeon in ages since I'm either soloing or in Cyrodiil these days, so I could be wrong.
Chronicburn wrote: »Lieblingsjunge wrote: »Who the heck uses Eye of the Storm in PvE?People use EotS in PVE? I thought Elemental Rage was preferred in dungeons and trials, because the tank keeps the boss you're burning down stationary? Mind you, I haven't set foot in a dungeon in ages since I'm either soloing or in Cyrodiil these days, so I could be wrong.
In vma it's good for some instances
I've always heard people use stationary or meteor most of the time. Because you, as probably one of the very few, who uses EoTS in PvE, Zenimax shouldn't nerf an ability, that obviously needed nerfs?
It got nerfed because the damage + the utility it gives you - was/is too much. Nobody would've made a thread like this if the damage was 12% lower when they introduced it.
12% damage loss is nothing. It was already overperforming, so Zeni brining it down a notch is good. Why can't people just realise that overperforming stuff - even if you use it/it was initially like this - deserves a nerf?
I really hate when you self righteous people decide for everyone else what is overpowered and what isn't ...
WELL GUESS WHAT????
NOW THAT YOU NERFED THIS SOMETHING ELSE IS "over performing"
THIS WILL NEVER STOP UNTIL EVERY SKILL IN THE GAME IS *** USELESS THANKS TO YOUR ASS-BACKWARDS WAY OF THINKING.
STOP RUINING THE GAME
STOP THE GOD DAMN NERFS!!!!!!