Mag wardens currently have the highest *burst* damage in PvP due to so many of their skills lining up and hitting at the same time.
But while their burst is higher than a sorc's, their defense suffers. It's not bad, especially considering that heal ult, but it's not great either.
Increasing mag warden DPS for PvE would have to leave the beetles and the birds alone. They'd need a ground target dot or something that wouldn't be effective in PvP.
What we cannot do is give them an execute. They'd be 1second combo killing everyone in PvP that isn't holding down the block button.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »Well seeing how absolutely and insanely OP in pvp, mag wardens are, I cant imagine what it would be if they got DPS increase ...
Good thing then that PvP and PvE rely on different types of damage.
Warden has high burst damage, which is useless in PvE. So just buff their DoTs, which are useless in PvP.
Or just make cliff racer dodgeable (that's the only thing that makes them "OP" in PvP).
Are you still going on about this? Get a clue. Cliff Racer is dodgeable, from several different sources. But since dodge roll isan't one of them, everyone still cries about it.
I never said magicka warden was OP in PvP (they suck there too, as you can see from PvP leader boards). I was just giving a suggestion to the whiners. If ZOS doesn't want to buff PvE DPS because kids will cry that they're OP, I'd rather they just make cliff racer dodgeable (but with a faster cast or something).
@MLGProPlayer
You obviously didn't read my comment about the specific part of your post, because Cliff Racer IS *** DODGEABLE.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »
So boost their ice AoE ability. One morph is based on max health and is centered on the caster, the other morph is targetable and based on max magicka+spell damage.Increasing mag warden DPS for PvE would have to leave the beetles and the birds alone. They'd need a ground target dot or something that wouldn't be effective in PvP.
Now THAT would be out of control. That bear puts out way too much damage as it is.
If the bear were banned from PvP, then I would be in favor of this.
As it is now in PvP it's just an annoying, skill-less variable that occasionally can put out high damage.
letsdothedungeonslow wrote: »Do some people actually think that balance means every class should do equal damage?
Then what would be the point of having classes at all?
I don't mind my magDK doing less damage than my sorc, because they're more flexible and can off tank much better, they have chains and talons and a kick ass way of one shotting the trolls on vMA by halfway across the room.
Wardens are also flexible, and can do heals, damage and tanks, whereas sorcs are more or less a one trick pony.
The balance issues that I see is that in PvP certain skills are OP. The Warden has two of these.
If you can't do 25k with a Warden, just live with it or make a sorc.
tinythinker wrote: »
Ihatenightblades wrote: »tinythinker wrote: »
No the person who said this most likely gets destroyed in pvp by ever class if he's struggling against wardens LOL
MLGProPlayer wrote: »Ihatenightblades wrote: »tinythinker wrote: »
No the person who said this most likely gets destroyed in pvp by ever class if he's struggling against wardens LOL
In theory I can see why they might be strong in PvP, but they seem to be really unpopular on Cyrodiil leader boards (which would imply they aren't OP). I'm not sure if they fair better in BGs since BG leader boards don't show class.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »Ihatenightblades wrote: »tinythinker wrote: »
No the person who said this most likely gets destroyed in pvp by ever class if he's struggling against wardens LOL
In theory I can see why they might be strong in PvP, but they seem to be really unpopular on Cyrodiil leader boards (which would imply they aren't OP). I'm not sure if they fair better in BGs since BG leader boards don't show class.
Thats because they've been in the game for only 3 months and they are locked behind a giant paywall. Did you actually expect to see the same numbers as the other 4 classes that are free and they are in the game for over 3 years?
And PVP leaderboards are not an indication of player skill or class effectiveness
Bryong9ub17_ESO wrote: »Everyone cried that Wardan would be a pay to win class so this is what you get.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »Just equal (in terms of DPS) to other "support classes" like templar and DK.
Bryong9ub17_ESO wrote: »Everyone cried that Wardan would be a pay to win class so this is what you get.
I recall that myself, when they were taking away from the temp, and give things to the warden, I think is was all ESO *** to get people to buy the Update, thinking they would get a new powerful player type to play, it was prob one of they biggest BS hypes, wardens SUCK period......................................................................................., I was a fool to buy into it and bought the dlc, and now have a player type that I no longer have any use to play and it has no advantage in anything
and that's the truth, and don't try and buff, as will as be another round of ZOS BS, so just let it Rip.
Bryong9ub17_ESO wrote: »Everyone cried that Wardan would be a pay to win class so this is what you get.
I recall that myself, when they were taking away from the temp, and give things to the warden, I think is was all ESO *** to get people to buy the Update, thinking they would get a new powerful player type to play, it was prob one of they biggest BS hypes, wardens SUCK period......................................................................................., I was a fool to buy into it and bought the dlc, and now have a player type that I no longer have any use to play and it has no advantage in anything
and that's the truth, and don't try and buff, as will as be another round of ZOS BS, so just let it Rip.
They suck at one aspect of the game. Magicka PVE DPS. Thats the truth.
The class being dead isnt the truth. Its ur own biased personal opinion.
Flameheart wrote: »I heard the class sucks as magicka DD, maybe not as stamina DD. So just don't play it as magicka DD in PvE.
Bryong9ub17_ESO wrote: »Everyone cried that Wardan would be a pay to win class so this is what you get.
I recall that myself, when they were taking away from the temp, and give things to the warden, I think is was all ESO *** to get people to buy the Update, thinking they would get a new powerful player type to play, it was prob one of they biggest BS hypes, wardens SUCK period......................................................................................., I was a fool to buy into it and bought the dlc, and now have a player type that I no longer have any use to play and it has no advantage in anything
and that's the truth, and don't try and buff, as will as be another round of ZOS BS, so just let it Rip.
They suck at one aspect of the game. Magicka PVE DPS. Thats the truth.
The class being dead isnt the truth. Its ur own biased personal opinion.
Nemesis7884 wrote: »mag warden could need a slight buff but im more concerned about stam warden in pve tbh
comparing it for example to a stam sorc - if you're going the dw-dot route it's not even a contest...stam sorc wins 10:0...but even if you go the burst route witha 2h - you'd think the stam warden would win out here...nope even here a stam sorc is better with a SIGNIFICANTLY stronger wrecking blow (why did they kill of the physical damage passive again?)...
So while i think mag warden might benefit from a slight damage buff the real issue imo is stam warden which needs desperatly a buff - giving it the physical damage passive back would be a start
MLGProPlayer wrote: »Just equal (in terms of DPS) to other "support classes" like templar and DK.
You realise stamina DK currently wipes the floor with everything else? Just saying. However, I think the idea of some classes pulling less DPS because they are focused on "support" is nonsense. I see no logical planing by ZOS in what turns out to be best what so ever.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »Bryong9ub17_ESO wrote: »Everyone cried that Wardan would be a pay to win class so this is what you get.
I recall that myself, when they were taking away from the temp, and give things to the warden, I think is was all ESO *** to get people to buy the Update, thinking they would get a new powerful player type to play, it was prob one of they biggest BS hypes, wardens SUCK period......................................................................................., I was a fool to buy into it and bought the dlc, and now have a player type that I no longer have any use to play and it has no advantage in anything
and that's the truth, and don't try and buff, as will as be another round of ZOS BS, so just let it Rip.
They suck at one aspect of the game. Magicka PVE DPS. Thats the truth.
The class being dead isnt the truth. Its ur own biased personal opinion.
They are good tanks and healers, but still not better than DK and templar (most teams still roll with 2x DK, 2x templar).
Nemesis7884 wrote: »mag warden could need a slight buff but im more concerned about stam warden in pve tbh
comparing it for example to a stam sorc - if you're going the dw-dot route it's not even a contest...stam sorc wins 10:0...but even if you go the burst route witha 2h - you'd think the stam warden would win out here...nope even here a stam sorc is better with a SIGNIFICANTLY stronger wrecking blow (why did they kill of the physical damage passive again?)...
So while i think mag warden might benefit from a slight damage buff the real issue imo is stam warden which needs desperatly a buff - giving it the physical damage passive back would be a start
Try a bow / bow stamden. The damage is ridiculously good. I got compliments from ( ones that werent nobs and didnt boot me ) from vet 660 players as a lvl 35 in dungeons. In pvp they are good too, really, REALLY intense and involves lots of finger action, but really good none the less. As for magden, I can see how their abilities could leave room to be desired. My Magden is a healer. I looked at the abilities and realized straight off magden dps would be problematic.
Finally MLG I could convince you!MLGProPlayer wrote: »Mag wardens currently have the highest *burst* damage in PvP due to so many of their skills lining up and hitting at the same time.
But while their burst is higher than a sorc's, their defense suffers. It's not bad, especially considering that heal ult, but it's not great either.
Increasing mag warden DPS for PvE would have to leave the beetles and the birds alone. They'd need a ground target dot or something that wouldn't be effective in PvP.
What we cannot do is give them an execute. They'd be 1second combo killing everyone in PvP that isn't holding down the block button.
Burst is useless in PvE, so I wouldn't expect them to buff that. Buff their DoTs and make bear a single-bar ability.
As someone with extensive pvp play with magwardens i could agree with that statement, but mainly cause of a couple over the top mechanics, which most definetly should be addressed. Most importantly, yes you've guessed it.Wardens are borderline OP in PvP, that tree ultimate is just out of control. Completely out of control
This is true, but comes at the expense of being the most telegraphed setup on the game, even more so than sorcs, and the complete lack of reliable hard ot soft Cc.Mag wardens currently have the highest *burst* damage in PvP due to so many of their skills lining up and hitting at the same time.
Nemesis7884 wrote: »mag warden could need a slight buff but im more concerned about stam warden in pve tbh
comparing it for example to a stam sorc - if you're going the dw-dot route it's not even a contest...stam sorc wins 10:0...but even if you go the burst route witha 2h - you'd think the stam warden would win out here...nope even here a stam sorc is better with a SIGNIFICANTLY stronger wrecking blow (why did they kill of the physical damage passive again?)...
So while i think mag warden might benefit from a slight damage buff the real issue imo is stam warden which needs desperatly a buff - giving it the physical damage passive back would be a start
Try a bow / bow stamden. The damage is ridiculously good. I got compliments from ( ones that werent nobs and didnt boot me ) from vet 660 players as a lvl 35 in dungeons. In pvp they are good too, really, REALLY intense and involves lots of finger action, but really good none the less. As for magden, I can see how their abilities could leave room to be desired. My Magden is a healer. I looked at the abilities and realized straight off magden dps would be problematic.
Bow/bow stam warden has the same DPS ceiling as magwarden, because they rely pretty much on same passives and skills. If you got some compliment for it, it is more because your dps was enough for that content or they were not expecting it to be that high from bowIt is still 20% worse than DW/bow stam warden. When talking numbers, you are looking at ~32-33k DPS on 3M dummy with bear and vma bow.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »Well seeing how absolutely and insanely OP in pvp, mag wardens are, I cant imagine what it would be if they got DPS increase ...
Good thing then that PvP and PvE rely on different types of damage.
Warden has high burst damage, which is useless in PvE. So just buff their DoTs, which are useless in PvP.
Or just make cliff racer dodgeable (that's the only thing that makes them "OP" in PvP).
Are you still going on about this? Get a clue. Cliff Racer is dodgeable, from several different sources. But since dodge roll isan't one of them, everyone still cries about it.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »Ihatenightblades wrote: »tinythinker wrote: »
No the person who said this most likely gets destroyed in pvp by ever class if he's struggling against wardens LOL
In theory I can see why they might be strong in PvP, but they seem to be really unpopular on Cyrodiil leader boards (which would imply they aren't OP). I'm not sure if they fair better in BGs since BG leader boards don't show class.