paulsimonps wrote: »White wabbit wrote: »paulsimonps wrote: »White wabbit wrote: »paulsimonps wrote: »@White wabbitWhite wabbit wrote: »Oh look this faction is wining let me join them , oh look that one is now winning let me swap
If it was a crown store token that was 2000 crowns in the store, that would not be a problem, and if someone did still do that.... then fricking let them. Nobody said it had to be something that we could swap on a whim
So what your really saying is that you don't care about faction balance , come play as Dc on Eu Xbox then your see what alliance change could end being like
You don't get it do you? If to cost real life money to change factions then many would not do it and if they did they only once. The balance of factions would be mainly unaffected by this type of thing. And I don't need to go to your specific faction to see anything, stuff like that changes ALL THE TIME, and it goes from faction to faction, campaign to campaign, even hour to hour how populated a faction is. People will not be changing back and forth over and over again if the battles goes bad if it costs them $20 every time they do it.
And you don't get it , there are factions that are already over populated that if a small percentage of the underdog alliance swapped over it would be even worse , if people want to be in that alliance then work for it not have a easy route
THAT CHANGES ALL THE TIME FROM FACTION TO FACTION THOUGH! OK. People would not spend 20 dollars every time their faction got in a bit of trouble, and the faction that is the "underdog" changes all the time, you can't declare yourself as the permanent underdog of a campaign just cause you lost a lot.
White wabbit wrote: »paulsimonps wrote: »White wabbit wrote: »paulsimonps wrote: »White wabbit wrote: »paulsimonps wrote: »@White wabbitWhite wabbit wrote: »Oh look this faction is wining let me join them , oh look that one is now winning let me swap
If it was a crown store token that was 2000 crowns in the store, that would not be a problem, and if someone did still do that.... then fricking let them. Nobody said it had to be something that we could swap on a whim
So what your really saying is that you don't care about faction balance , come play as Dc on Eu Xbox then your see what alliance change could end being like
You don't get it do you? If to cost real life money to change factions then many would not do it and if they did they only once. The balance of factions would be mainly unaffected by this type of thing. And I don't need to go to your specific faction to see anything, stuff like that changes ALL THE TIME, and it goes from faction to faction, campaign to campaign, even hour to hour how populated a faction is. People will not be changing back and forth over and over again if the battles goes bad if it costs them $20 every time they do it.
And you don't get it , there are factions that are already over populated that if a small percentage of the underdog alliance swapped over it would be even worse , if people want to be in that alliance then work for it not have a easy route
THAT CHANGES ALL THE TIME FROM FACTION TO FACTION THOUGH! OK. People would not spend 20 dollars every time their faction got in a bit of trouble, and the faction that is the "underdog" changes all the time, you can't declare yourself as the permanent underdog of a campaign just cause you lost a lot.
Might be true on Pc , but on other platforms Ad and pact can put up 6-7 bars over the various campaigns Dc maybe 3 bars on a good day , so allowing an idea like this may make the faction balance even worse , but hey you have your opinion which is wanting g the easy option , if you wanted to play on a different faction then make a toon on that faction
paulsimonps wrote: »
You call it Lazy, I call it wanting to not have to redo 2 years worth of content and achievements on a new character and trying to remember exactly how they were made in character creation simply cause some A hole thinks you need to do it his way.
If she was to be able to change Alliance, how would that personally hurt you? Would you even know? The argument against this type of thing is childish to say the least. How would you ever be able to know if someone you didn't know changed alliance? With that fact that "alt" characters can be any faction and be on the exact same campaign there is already a way for people to swap alliances. People do this all the time and yet no one notices, most don't even care. So how would it hurt to have an option to swap the alliance of an existing character to not have to remake them or lose any progress? There is zero harm in this.
This. And on top of this, the alliance change would cost money. No one is going to be flipping alliances on a whim. Like I said earlier, if people wanted to flip alliances on a whim based on whatever's happening in Cyrodiil, they'd just switch characters, so what difference does it make if we get alliance change tokens. Basically the arguments against it are so easily refuted.@White wabbit @paulsimonps My proposal was insisting a pretty long cooldown (months) so flip flopping alliances often would not be plausible. Therefore rendering the argument you guys are having rather redundant.
SydneyGrey wrote: »This. And on top of this, the alliance change would cost money. No one is going to be flipping alliances on a whim. Like I said earlier, if people wanted to flip alliances on a whim based on whatever's happening in Cyrodiil, they'd just switch characters, so what difference does it make if we get alliance change tokens. Basically the arguments against it are so easily refuted.@White wabbit @paulsimonps My proposal was insisting a pretty long cooldown (months) so flip flopping alliances often would not be plausible. Therefore rendering the argument you guys are having rather redundant.
[/quote
Yet the majority are against it and still people make new polls for something that isn't needed or wanted
White wabbit wrote: »SydneyGrey wrote: »This. And on top of this, the alliance change would cost money. No one is going to be flipping alliances on a whim. Like I said earlier, if people wanted to flip alliances on a whim based on whatever's happening in Cyrodiil, they'd just switch characters, so what difference does it make if we get alliance change tokens. Basically the arguments against it are so easily refuted.@White wabbit @paulsimonps My proposal was insisting a pretty long cooldown (months) so flip flopping alliances often would not be plausible. Therefore rendering the argument you guys are having rather redundant.
Yet the majority are against it and still people make new polls for something that isn't needed or wanted
This. It's split, but with slightly more wanting alliance change than not wanting it.paulsimonps wrote: »Its as of me writing this, 128 for it and 99 against it. So the Majority, of those that voted, wants it.
i'm all for an alliance change capability.
as far as i'm concerned, it can be a one time thing.
ymmv.
i'm all for an alliance change capability.
as far as i'm concerned, it can be a one time thing.
ymmv.
1 time thing I really don't see ZOS doing. You have to look at it from a third party perspective. ZOS is a business, if they are going to do something like that, they are going to want money/profit from it. Exactly like race/name change tokens.
Autumnhart wrote: »i'm all for an alliance change capability.
as far as i'm concerned, it can be a one time thing.
ymmv.
1 time thing I really don't see ZOS doing. You have to look at it from a third party perspective. ZOS is a business, if they are going to do something like that, they are going to want money/profit from it. Exactly like race/name change tokens.
They have made game changes in the past that weren't about direct monetization. Race and name changes have no effect on the overall game. Alliance changes with no limit in number or time would.
It should be on a 30 or 60 day cooldown per character and cost 3500-4000 crowns. This would do nothing to disrupt "The balance of Cyrodiil"—I don't even think anyone apart from the most inexperienced solo player would even try to switch to the "Winning" side. "Winning" in Cyrodiil isn't fun—you make the most AP, and get the best fights when you're pushed to Glademist/Arrius/Faregyl, and have 2 bars vs each alliance having three.
paulsimonps wrote: »White wabbit wrote: »SydneyGrey wrote: »This. And on top of this, the alliance change would cost money. No one is going to be flipping alliances on a whim. Like I said earlier, if people wanted to flip alliances on a whim based on whatever's happening in Cyrodiil, they'd just switch characters, so what difference does it make if we get alliance change tokens. Basically the arguments against it are so easily refuted.@White wabbit @paulsimonps My proposal was insisting a pretty long cooldown (months) so flip flopping alliances often would not be plausible. Therefore rendering the argument you guys are having rather redundant.
Yet the majority are against it and still people make new polls for something that isn't needed or wanted
Its as of me writing this, 128 for it and 99 against it. So the Majority, of those that voted, wants it.