And so the entitlement threads begin...
theher0not wrote: »
Wreuntzylla wrote: »
So when your car breaks down do they give you some cash to make up for the down time?
False premise. You don't have downtime when your car breaks down. Dealerships immediately deliver a temporary vehicle to an address of your choice and typically comp you some future planned maintenance.
Either you have never purchased a new car or you are buying ford pinto knockoffs....
You are still comparing the texture of a granite stone to the taste of a fried egg sandwich. Basically you are claiming if I sent someone a message using the paid version of google it could potentially affect every person that has a google account.
Utter nonsense @kargen27 - I am saying the paid service has a different reliability than the free service.You know this isn't true. With ESO though it is true. Redundancy isn't an answer when redundancy would mean less interaction in a game designed specifically for interaction.
You don't appear to have any understanding of redundancy failover. It does not limit interaction in any way. It provides a bridge while root cause analysis is performed on the failed server instance(s). The servers for ESO don't fail immediately after a patch....
All you have to do to understand how reliable service without downtime can be provided is look to other MMOs.Oh and it took me maybe eight seconds to find examples of wide spread down times with the business service. Some lasted for hours.
And if it exceeds Google's 99.9% uptime guarantee, they comp you your payments for that month.
This thread is not about whether unreasonable downtime occurs. It's about compensation for the downtime when you pay the subscription fee....
Actually what you said, and I quote, "And you obviously use the free service. If you used the business level service you would know it never goes down due to failover redundancy."
"never goes down"
and you are correct this thread is about compensation for downtime so why did you bring Google into it? A couple of hours of downtime doesn't equate something that should be compensated. Participation ribbons is what brought us to this kind of false entitlement.
and the granite/egg sandwich still applies. If you have the background you claim you know this...
Read the Service Terms and Agreement ZOS covered their arse on down time. You will not get reimbursed.
theher0not wrote: »
Again, you didn't pay for game time. ESO+ is for other bonuses. The game is B2P, basically free to play. Blizzard and FF14 may give compensation, but they require mandatory subscription.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »Servers have been down more than they've been up this week. That's pretty ridiculous for a game that's in it's 4th year.
letsdothedungeonslow wrote: »There is simply no other equivalent I can think of when you pay for a service and a significant amount of the time the service is not available, often without any explanation.
If you leased a car, and one day you went to get in it, and it wasn't there or wouldn't start, and instead there was a sign that said 'Down for maintenance' and you weren't offered any explanation or compensation, people wouldn't tolerate it.
To me, this is just a sign that as a whole, gamers are way too accepting of being shafted.
Sorry sir, but you are wrong. I sent my money for an exact game time which was 6 months of subscription for me last time.Again, you didn't pay for game time. ESO+ is for other bonuses.
theher0not wrote: »
Again, you didn't pay for game time. ESO+ is for other bonuses. The game is B2P, basically free to play. Blizzard and FF14 may give compensation, but they require mandatory subscription.
letsdothedungeonslow wrote: »There is simply no other equivalent I can think of when you pay for a service and a significant amount of the time the service is not available, often without any explanation.
If you leased a car, and one day you went to get in it, and it wasn't there or wouldn't start, and instead there was a sign that said 'Down for maintenance' and you weren't offered any explanation or compensation, people wouldn't tolerate it.
To me, this is just a sign that as a whole, gamers are way too accepting of being shafted.
theher0not wrote: »
Again, you didn't pay for game time. ESO+ is for other bonuses. The game is B2P, basically free to play. Blizzard and FF14 may give compensation, but they require mandatory subscription.
Well it's not a bad analogyJasonSilverSpring wrote: »Let's take that analogy and expand on it. I do lease my car. If it fails to start I have to tow it to the dealer for repairs. Perhaps that takes several days. Does my lease get extended or do I get any credit for the day's I don't have the car? No.
Anyway it is a bad analogy because no one pays for playtime.
JasonSilverSpring wrote: »letsdothedungeonslow wrote: »There is simply no other equivalent I can think of when you pay for a service and a significant amount of the time the service is not available, often without any explanation.
If you leased a car, and one day you went to get in it, and it wasn't there or wouldn't start, and instead there was a sign that said 'Down for maintenance' and you weren't offered any explanation or compensation, people wouldn't tolerate it.
To me, this is just a sign that as a whole, gamers are way too accepting of being shafted.
Let's take that analogy and expand on it. I do lease my car. If it fails to start I have to tow it to the dealer for repairs. Perhaps that takes several days. Does my lease get extended or do I get any credit for the day's I don't have the car? No.
Anyway it is a bad analogy because no one pays for playtime. The game is free to play once bought with a one time purchase. ESO+ gives perks not playtime. And one of those perks is reduced research time which even works while the game is down.
Well it's not a bad analogyJasonSilverSpring wrote: »Let's take that analogy and expand on it. I do lease my car. If it fails to start I have to tow it to the dealer for repairs. Perhaps that takes several days. Does my lease get extended or do I get any credit for the day's I don't have the car? No.
Anyway it is a bad analogy because no one pays for playtime.. The good dealer, I emphasize - a good dealer - will give you a replacement car to let you drive for the period you paid for. The bad dealer though would not give you any replacement, instead you'd see a bunch of rules and restrictions written and signed by you, giving them the right to refuse anything. The main problem is when this dealer has an exclusiveness for leasing cars and when all customers are accepting these rules without questions.
JasonSilverSpring wrote: »I still say it is a bad analogy since you are not paying for playtime.
JasonSilverSpring wrote: »So many white knights. Even more who missed the point of the OP completely.
If zos actually listens to the pts testers most of the bugs wouldnt have been in the release patch. Zos dont listen. So few pts test. Bugs go live bc:
Patch was released with faulty q&a.
Game taken down to fix.
(Not what paying members mindfully paid for ^^^)
Zos continues to show lack of appreciation toward its paying members by discontinueing time-for-sub pets (remember those? the monkey, the spider, the sphere, etc?). Have yet to give out anything to show appreciation since then, even though u have players paying for subs + crowns for 3 years.
Game taken down for x amount of time.
Zos doesnt giaf.
Let me paint a different scenario for u:
Zos takes game down for 5 hours. Sends everyone 1 xp scroll in mail - no cost out of zos pocket. And now the playerbase is excited bc they feel they are appreciated by zos and then throws money at zos for rando *** like crown crates, as a thanks for being appreciated consumer.
Whats healthier for the game. Rewarding ur players for sticking around?
Zos doesnt think so. And thats why the majority of the old playerbase is GONE. And those of us who are still around are waiting for a better game to jump ship to.
The only thing keeping me around is my friends.
Zos hasnt tried anything to keep me around or entice me to sub, bc all they do is make terrible decisions for the game - a different topic.
Me personally. I am nearly finished my crowns from my first year of subbing. I havent subbed since then, ive used those crowns only to purchase dlc.
Zos is a horrible company that cares only about money and not the ppl giving them the money. Track record is public.
White knighting zos for anything is so sad. Bc ur so off base, especially here.
All these players are asking for is zos showing them a little appreciation for throwing them cash month after month.
Pre coffee... why did i read the forums now
I did not miss the point. There is valid arguments about the amount of downtime. And, I feel it is totally valid to choose to not financially support the game if it is not living up to your expectations. And, I would agree it would be nice if ZOS gave us some token to recognize the issue and thank us for hanging in there (even for those that are not on ESO+).
But, to take it to the point of wanting compensation for time lost is where I disagree.
So, you and I agree on some show of appreciation at least.
But, I do not agree that ZOS is a horrible company that only cares about money. Obviously earning a profit is important to any business, but that is not all ZOS is about in my opinion. I just wish ZOS would hire a few more people like Gina. She cannot be here 24/7 and with some additional resources they could really improve communication. But, while they don't always listen to feedback on the forums there have been cases where they have.