Maintenance for the week of May 25:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – May 25
• ESO Store and Account System for maintenance – May 27, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 4:00PM EDT (20:00 UTC)

Should SKYSHARDS be made available account-wide? [Improved poll, with more options!]

  • Yadvo
    Yadvo
    ✭✭
    Make the skyshards available account wide, with no restrictions
    Tavore1138 wrote: »
    RT_Frank wrote: »
    So please, those of who want no change think about the majority of players rather than the "integrity" of the game or RP reasons or whatever.
    Also 46% is not a majority - you need to either listen better in maths or sue your teacher if that's what they taught you.

    When he and I refer to "the majority" we consider the sum of those who want skyshards to be account-wide and those who want them to be marked after absorbing them. That is what the definition of change is. And 70% of the players want a change to be introduced in one way or the other. It is the opposite to not touching the system. So please do not manipulate the data.

    Also, do not get personal with others, rather try to actually understand what was written and comprehend the sentence. Thanks!
    Edited by Yadvo on June 4, 2017 11:21AM
  • CavalryPK
    CavalryPK
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Make the skyshards available account wide, with no restrictions
    Same thing with mages guild and undaunted. Lol
    THE CAVELRY HAS ARRIVED! Cav is a professional magblade, (in his not so professional opinion). He is immortal and is fighting for the Pact since 2E 572, amidst the turmoil of the Second Akaviri Invasion. He protects the provinces of Skyrim, Morrowind and Black Marsh.

    Check out his PVP YouTube channel !

    https://youtube.com/TheCavalryPK
  • Yadvo
    Yadvo
    ✭✭
    Make the skyshards available account wide, with no restrictions
    CavalryPK wrote: »
    Same thing with mages guild and undaunted. Lol

    Please focus on the skyshards. We do not discuss mages guild and undaunted, as this is trggering for the RPers and once again we will go off topic. Under my proporsal, guild levels would go unchanged. Thanks!
  • SpearDusk
    SpearDusk
    ✭✭✭
    Skyshards are fine the way they are and should not be touched
    Its a tough life sometimes, I'll just have to put on my boots and go out into the world and collect the skyshards
  • Tandor
    Tandor
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Skyshards are fine the way they are and should not be touched
    RT_Frank wrote: »
    The problem with discussions like these that advocate for change in ESO is that most people who vote for no change do so because they have had to suffer/deal with the system, and hate how new people don't have to if it is changed.

    I wouldn't under-estimate the number who vote to retain an existing system because they prefer it to whatever is being proposed, often because they don't want an existing style of game turned into something else that it was never designed to be.
  • Tandor
    Tandor
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Skyshards are fine the way they are and should not be touched
    Yadvo wrote: »
    Tavore1138 wrote: »
    RT_Frank wrote: »
    So please, those of who want no change think about the majority of players rather than the "integrity" of the game or RP reasons or whatever.
    Also 46% is not a majority - you need to either listen better in maths or sue your teacher if that's what they taught you.

    When he and I refer to "the majority" we consider the sum of those who want skyshards to be account-wide and those who want them to be marked after absorbing them. That is what the definition of change is. And 70% of the players want a change to be introduced in one way or the other. It is the opposite to not touching the system. So please do not manipulate the data.

    Also, do not get personal with others, rather try to actually understand what was written and comprehend the sentence. Thanks!

    It ill behoves you to accuse others of manipulating the data when you can only get a majority for your opinion that collected skyshards should be account-wide by including one of the poll options that was not related to collected skyshards being account-wide.

    This is your second attempt to get people to vote by a majority for account-wide skyshards, and you've failed both times to win the argument. I suggest you leave it there.
  • Yadvo
    Yadvo
    ✭✭
    Make the skyshards available account wide, with no restrictions
    Tandor wrote: »
    Yadvo wrote: »
    Tavore1138 wrote: »
    RT_Frank wrote: »
    So please, those of who want no change think about the majority of players rather than the "integrity" of the game or RP reasons or whatever.
    Also 46% is not a majority - you need to either listen better in maths or sue your teacher if that's what they taught you.

    When he and I refer to "the majority" we consider the sum of those who want skyshards to be account-wide and those who want them to be marked after absorbing them. That is what the definition of change is. And 70% of the players want a change to be introduced in one way or the other. It is the opposite to not touching the system. So please do not manipulate the data.

    Also, do not get personal with others, rather try to actually understand what was written and comprehend the sentence. Thanks!

    It ill behoves you to accuse others of manipulating the data when you can only get a majority for your opinion that collected skyshards should be account-wide by including one of the poll options that was not related to collected skyshards being account-wide.

    This is your second attempt to get people to vote by a majority for account-wide skyshards, and you've failed both times to win the argument. I suggest you leave it there.

    43051169c7a7b8517db99fba709b618506ced2b1fdca827c2ef3b49916592071.jpg

    Too bad that besides not agreeing with my opinion, you ignore the needs of the console players!
    Edited by Yadvo on June 4, 2017 1:54PM
  • Yadvo
    Yadvo
    ✭✭
    Make the skyshards available account wide, with no restrictions
    Kay1 wrote: »
    I'm glad you used my suggestion.

    Us console players will be in a dreaming land if they finally decide to do that with Skyshards and Lorebooks.

    The grind in console is just horrible while in PC it can take 2-3h in console it can take days, please as someone who also play ESO on PC think about us too we really struggle.

    No problem mate! Im actually open to the discussion, despite my strong opinion on the subject. Showing some love to the console players didnt come to my mind at frist. But that seems like an option should the account-wide option not be considered by the developers.
  • Tavore1138
    Tavore1138
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Skyshards are fine the way they are and should not be touched
    Yadvo wrote: »
    Tavore1138 wrote: »
    RT_Frank wrote: »
    So please, those of who want no change think about the majority of players rather than the "integrity" of the game or RP reasons or whatever.
    Also 46% is not a majority - you need to either listen better in maths or sue your teacher if that's what they taught you.

    When he and I refer to "the majority" we consider the sum of those who want skyshards to be account-wide and those who want them to be marked after absorbing them. That is what the definition of change is. And 70% of the players want a change to be introduced in one way or the other. It is the opposite to not touching the system. So please do not manipulate the data.

    Also, do not get personal with others, rather try to actually understand what was written and comprehend the sentence. Thanks!

    1. Giving console players the ability to see them on the map IS no change as for PC this option exists already - it is just enabling console players to have access to what we already have. Pretending people who want that is the same as wanting skyshards to be account wide is dishonest.
    2. I got personal in response to a post accusing me and those like me of being essentially selfish and spiteful if we dared to disagree - if you are going to try and moderate your thread then don't play favourites with those that agree with you it's cheap.
  • Grabmoore
    Grabmoore
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Skyshards are fine the way they are and should not be touched
    Making skyshards account-wide like CP would mean only one of your characters ever has to go into Cyrodiil.

    This is an argument against it, no?
    You should have to do it or live with not having them. Gathering skyshards might get some people into PvP, even if they thought they wouldn't enjoy it.
    Edited by Grabmoore on June 4, 2017 2:46PM
    EU - PC - Ebonheart Pact
    Iggy Grabmoore - Argonian Magicka Templar | Nyctasha - Redguard Stamina Nightblade
    Do-Ra'Zhar - Khajiit Stamina DK | Ashmedi - Dunmer Magicka DK
    Vanya Darchow - AD Altmer Magicka Sorc | Malek gro'Kash - Orc Stam Sorc
    GM of "Handelshaus von Riften" - Trading & PvX Community
  • Eirella
    Eirella
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Make the skyshards available account wide once you hit level 50. All those that you have not collected before you hit 50 but gathered on other characters at max level, then become available.
    Sure, why not?
    (PC/NA) - | @Eirella - formerly @jinxgames | CP 1000+ | Mainly PvPer (EP) | Haxus
    /uninstalled
  • Yadvo
    Yadvo
    ✭✭
    Make the skyshards available account wide, with no restrictions
    Tavore1138 wrote: »
    Yadvo wrote: »
    Tavore1138 wrote: »
    RT_Frank wrote: »
    So please, those of who want no change think about the majority of players rather than the "integrity" of the game or RP reasons or whatever.
    Also 46% is not a majority - you need to either listen better in maths or sue your teacher if that's what they taught you.

    When he and I refer to "the majority" we consider the sum of those who want skyshards to be account-wide and those who want them to be marked after absorbing them. That is what the definition of change is. And 70% of the players want a change to be introduced in one way or the other. It is the opposite to not touching the system. So please do not manipulate the data.

    Also, do not get personal with others, rather try to actually understand what was written and comprehend the sentence. Thanks!

    1. Giving console players the ability to see them on the map IS no change as for PC this option exists already - it is just enabling console players to have access to what we already have. Pretending people who want that is the same as wanting skyshards to be account wide is dishonest.
    2. I got personal in response to a post accusing me and those like me of being essentially selfish and spiteful if we dared to disagree - if you are going to try and moderate your thread then don't play favourites with those that agree with you it's cheap.

    Please stop trying to trigger people to start a fight over a subject of no relevance to the thread. Your opinion was noted and has the same value as every other.

    I fully agree that console players do not have addons and a such, certain improvements could be introduced (like the nameplates and buff diplay were). This however considering the "console friendly" option and making them accout-wide, means that the majority wants this subject to be looked into by the developers. The extent of changes is still up to the discussion. Also, if any changes should be made.
  • Yadvo
    Yadvo
    ✭✭
    Make the skyshards available account wide, with no restrictions
    Eirella wrote: »
    Sure, why not?

    My idea was that you would additionally explain why yes!
  • Tavore1138
    Tavore1138
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Skyshards are fine the way they are and should not be touched
    Yadvo wrote: »
    Tavore1138 wrote: »
    Yadvo wrote: »
    Tavore1138 wrote: »
    RT_Frank wrote: »
    So please, those of who want no change think about the majority of players rather than the "integrity" of the game or RP reasons or whatever.
    Also 46% is not a majority - you need to either listen better in maths or sue your teacher if that's what they taught you.

    When he and I refer to "the majority" we consider the sum of those who want skyshards to be account-wide and those who want them to be marked after absorbing them. That is what the definition of change is. And 70% of the players want a change to be introduced in one way or the other. It is the opposite to not touching the system. So please do not manipulate the data.

    Also, do not get personal with others, rather try to actually understand what was written and comprehend the sentence. Thanks!

    1. Giving console players the ability to see them on the map IS no change as for PC this option exists already - it is just enabling console players to have access to what we already have. Pretending people who want that is the same as wanting skyshards to be account wide is dishonest.
    2. I got personal in response to a post accusing me and those like me of being essentially selfish and spiteful if we dared to disagree - if you are going to try and moderate your thread then don't play favourites with those that agree with you it's cheap.

    Please stop trying to trigger people to start a fight over a subject of no relevance to the thread. Your opinion was noted and has the same value as every other.

    Then stop trying to weasel out of enabling abuse of people who disagree with your view while throwing your straw men at me.

    I came to your thread and argued honestly and politely until people chose to start being rude.
    Edited by Tavore1138 on June 4, 2017 3:09PM
  • Tandor
    Tandor
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Skyshards are fine the way they are and should not be touched
    Yadvo wrote: »
    Tandor wrote: »
    Yadvo wrote: »
    Tavore1138 wrote: »
    RT_Frank wrote: »
    So please, those of who want no change think about the majority of players rather than the "integrity" of the game or RP reasons or whatever.
    Also 46% is not a majority - you need to either listen better in maths or sue your teacher if that's what they taught you.

    When he and I refer to "the majority" we consider the sum of those who want skyshards to be account-wide and those who want them to be marked after absorbing them. That is what the definition of change is. And 70% of the players want a change to be introduced in one way or the other. It is the opposite to not touching the system. So please do not manipulate the data.

    Also, do not get personal with others, rather try to actually understand what was written and comprehend the sentence. Thanks!

    It ill behoves you to accuse others of manipulating the data when you can only get a majority for your opinion that collected skyshards should be account-wide by including one of the poll options that was not related to collected skyshards being account-wide.

    This is your second attempt to get people to vote by a majority for account-wide skyshards, and you've failed both times to win the argument. I suggest you leave it there.

    43051169c7a7b8517db99fba709b618506ced2b1fdca827c2ef3b49916592071.jpg

    Too bad that besides not agreeing with my opinion, you ignore the needs of the console players!

    My "needs" are no different to the console players, given that I am a PC player who uses no addons whatsoever. My views on this subject are based on how I play the game, not the platform on which I play it.
  • Fivtyprocent
    Fivtyprocent
    ✭✭
    Make the skyshards available account wide, with no restrictions
    The funniest part here is when you realise that all the 'RP' ''Casuals players that dont do endgame content'' ''# i want the best gear by doing casual quests only'' that voted to keep the current skyshards systems are the same ppl who voted to see the vma weapons droping in nma hahahahaha made my day seriously.
    For Justice !
  • Yadvo
    Yadvo
    ✭✭
    Make the skyshards available account wide, with no restrictions
    The funniest part here is when you realise that all the 'RP' ''Casuals players that dont do endgame content'' ''# i want the best gear by doing casual quests only'' that voted to keep the current skyshards systems are the same ppl who voted to see the vma weapons droping in nma hahahahaha made my day seriously.

    I do not know how you got that information. Please do not post about things that you cannot support with facts. This might trigger people.
  • Bouldercleave
    Bouldercleave
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    Once gathered, the skyshards are marked on the map for other characters (console players suggestion)
    Kay1 wrote: »
    I'm glad you used my suggestion.

    Us console players will be in a dreaming land if they finally decide to do that with Skyshards and Lorebooks.

    The grind in console is just horrible while in PC it can take 2-3h in console it can take days, please as someone who also play ESO on PC think about us too we really struggle.

    I don't think the developer's original intent was for you to "grind" skyshards. They are placed to be found as the story and your character progresses. I seriously doubt they intended you to run from one to another "collecting" them all at once.
  • idk
    idk
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Once gathered, the skyshards are marked on the map for other characters (console players suggestion)
    RT_Frank wrote: »
    The problem with discussions like these that advocate for change in ESO is that most people who vote for no change do so because they have had to suffer/deal with the system, and hate how new people don't have to if it is changed.

    Look at posts that advocate for account wide achievements, vma tokens, removal of trash traits in loot pool, and other similar discussions. The large majority of people against these changes only do so because, for example, to them it's unfair how they have to run vma 5000 times but new players don't.

    I too have multiple characters that have recollected skyshards over and over again and I am not looking forward to doing so with my Warden. It is not fun by any means. I don't care if it's easy, it's time consuming and considering all the bs RNG in this game, time is a precious commodity to those of us with busy lives.

    So please, those of who want no change think about the majority of players rather than the "integrity" of the game or RP reasons or whatever.

    Overgeneralization coupled with "facts" that do not seem to add up (have never seen anyone complain about an idea of removing trash traits from loot poll and more) do not make a solid argument.

    Further, several of us have stated there should be some effort made in a character to gain more skill points, not just handed over because someone did something on another character. Your comments clearly ignore this.
    The funniest part here is when you realise that all the 'RP' ''Casuals players that dont do endgame content'' ''# i want the best gear by doing casual quests only'' that voted to keep the current skyshards systems are the same ppl who voted to see the vma weapons droping in nma hahahahaha made my day seriously.

    This comment does not make sense. Seems he/she is Casual players have the similar interest in skill points as those that press hard in the game. Some want a lot on many characters and some little. I seriously doubt those that responded to either option are in one specific group of players and it would certainly be incorrect to use an assumption about that as a point of discussion that holds any value.
  • Jegpeg
    Jegpeg
    Make the skyshards available account wide once you hit level 50. All those that you have not collected before you hit 50 but gathered on other characters at max level, then become available.
    Make the skyshards available account wide once you hit level 50. All those that you have not collected before you hit 50 but gathered on other characters at max level, then become available..

    I think each character should be treated as completely separate. Shared bank space is good as it just makes "trading" between alts easier. Mounts are only a minor issue as the main could send the cash to a horse to a new toon and exoctic mounts are just bling, the same applies to housing.

    Early in the game a character skill points are very limited so a low level character able open every skill as it becomes available will be much more powerful than a character of the same level without what is essentially unlimited supply of skill points. This will make PVE fights either very easy for alts or very hard for new characters.

    Things get messy when you hit level 50 because CPs are account wide. When a new alt hits level 50 they suddenly become CP600 (or whatever) and have less than the number of skill points than most of their counterparts. I don't like this, I think champions points should be character based but given this is not the case I would favour alts getting access to skill points once they hit level 50.

    If skill points are account wide then the logical conclusion is that it should apply to experience. If a CP600 nightblade wants to play as a warden they should be able to create a CP600 warden without all the hard work to rising their experience, and I don't think that would be a good thing.
    Edited by Jegpeg on June 4, 2017 5:00PM
  • EleonoraCrendraven
    EleonoraCrendraven
    ✭✭✭
    Once gathered, the skyshards are marked on the map for other characters (console players suggestion)
    Collecting skyshards is part of "getting to know my new character and class" and an essential part of gameplay. Just making them aviable for new characters without doing anything with that character to "earn" them would take away a good part of the fun to play and develop a new character. So it is a NO from this one.
  • TheRealPotoroo
    TheRealPotoroo
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Make the skyshards available account wide, with no restrictions
    Grabmoore wrote: »
    Making skyshards account-wide like CP would mean only one of your characters ever has to go into Cyrodiil.

    This is an argument against it, no?
    You should have to do it or live with not having them. Gathering skyshards might get some people into PvP, even if they thought they wouldn't enjoy it.

    PvP is the most miserable experience I've ever had in gaming. Nobody should ever be forced to do it.
    PC NA, PC EU

    "Instead of taking the best of the dolmens (predictable rotation), the best of the geysers (scalability based on number of players), and the best of the dragons (map location and health indicators) and adding them together to make a fun and dynamic world event scenario, they gave us....... harrowstorms." https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/comment/6850523/#Comment_6850523
  • Tandor
    Tandor
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Skyshards are fine the way they are and should not be touched
    Kay1 wrote: »
    I'm glad you used my suggestion.

    Us console players will be in a dreaming land if they finally decide to do that with Skyshards and Lorebooks.

    The grind in console is just horrible while in PC it can take 2-3h in console it can take days, please as someone who also play ESO on PC think about us too we really struggle.

    I don't think the developer's original intent was for you to "grind" skyshards. They are placed to be found as the story and your character progresses. I seriously doubt they intended you to run from one to another "collecting" them all at once.

    Agreed. That is simply the price you pay for leveling from 1-50 in Skyreach.
  • Axoinus
    Axoinus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Skyshards are fine the way they are and should not be touched
    Against this. We need to earn it.
  • STEVIL
    STEVIL
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    Once gathered, the skyshards are marked on the map for other characters (console players suggestion)
    Tandor wrote: »
    You should not be able to create a character and instantly have as many as 133 skill points right out of the gate. If you can't understand why that is a bad idea, I will never be able to explain it to you.

    I am all for them being presented on the map once you found them (for console love), but I can't and will never be in agreement that skyshards should be account wide or accessable when you hit 50. It just waters down the game too much and it is already on the brink of being minecraft.

    And to @Walks_With_Kagouti - yes skyshard hunting is boring if that is ALL you are doing. It's on the same level as mindlessly grinding dolmens or zombies. It's not how the game was designed to be played, so it is "unnatural" in the ESO world. It feels off because it is counter to what they designed the game to be.

    I think you may have hit quite a large nail firmly on the head there.

    I wonder how many of those who don't like having to get skyshards on their alts are leveling those alts from 1-50 in Skyreach and then realising that they have to run around Tamriel getting all their missing skill points through skyshards because they don't want to do any questing as they don't like quests. It all makes you wonder why half of them are even playing a MMORPG in the first place!

    Well, as devil's advocate, after the first six or seven run thru a given quest, that new quest smeel and "what i play MMO for anyway vibe" are both long long gone.

    From an old fogey type perspective, coming from having gotten 5 of my 14 character to VET16 during the silver and gold before the switch to Cp, 3 of them to various levels in the vet ranges from 3-12 during that same period, deleted two vet chars during that period that i did not just include and now havibng leveld since 1T and morrow 5 more to cp 160+ with one more waiting at 12...

    this may not be at all about someone not wanting to quest when they level up characters but instead about having done those quests multiple times in multiple ways at various tiers in bronze silver gold etc... yeah, i dont take my new characters to level thru say a complete 5 zone DC plus molag bal plus etc old school gold dilver way either.

    Which means i do indeed end up doing skyshard runs after i get my level 50's done as quickly as i can/enjoy.

    Even though i have long since worked out the whys and wherefores, it seems to me that discovered skyshards and even wayshrines, dungeons, delves etc being visible on maps for alts makes a lot of sense.

    In case it matters, for perspective, since i hate grinding my leveling sequence involves XP boosters and the following in order:
    1. Run whatever intro their is.
    2. Unlock mages guilde, fighters guild, undaunted, Db abd TG lines and get Blade of Woe.
    3. Run all five starter islands.
    4. Run Auridon and Glenumbra quests thru and of course delves shards etc.
    5. Usually run the left side of Stormhaven or Deshaan (fairly dense)
    6. Run main quest thru to at least the Tharn speaks.
    7. Run mages guild all the way thru. .
    8. Run Fg thru.

    As you can see, it is mostly questing but focusing on the quick and done "starter level" quests more than the longer end-zone and DLC zone quests.

    usually i hit 50 during the MG or FG stages.



    Proudly skooma free while talks-when-drunk is in mandatory public housing.
    YFMV Your Fun May Vary.

    First Law of Nerf-o-Dynamics
    "The good way I used to get good kills *with good skill* was good but the way others kill me now is bad."

  • RT_Frank
    RT_Frank
    ✭✭✭
    Make the skyshards available account wide, with no restrictions
    Tavore1138 wrote: »
    RT_Frank wrote: »
    The problem with discussions like these that advocate for change in ESO is that most people who vote for no change do so because they have had to suffer/deal with the system, and hate how new people don't have to if it is changed.

    Look at posts that advocate for account wide achievements, vma tokens, removal of trash traits in loot pool, and other similar discussions. The large majority of people against these changes only do so because, for example, to them it's unfair how they have to run vma 5000 times but new players don't.

    I too have multiple characters that have recollected skyshards over and over again and I am not looking forward to doing so with my Warden. It is not fun by any means. I don't care if it's easy, it's time consuming and considering all the bs RNG in this game, time is a precious commodity to those of us with busy lives.

    So please, those of who want no change think about the majority of players rather than the "integrity" of the game or RP reasons or whatever.

    You appear to be indulging in a basic logical fallacy which assumes that the only reason that people disagree with you getting what you want is because they are mean and selfish. It's really not true. Also 46% is not a majority - you need to either listen better in maths or sue your teacher if that's what they taught you.

    The things you list are not all alike. It would easily be possible for achieves to be presented both as account wide and on a per character basis to keep both 'sides' happy - people claiming titles a character has not earned was always the issue here for most. I doubt you'd find many who would argue against either tokens or removal of the real trash traits either. But shards are different.

    You dismiss the RP aspects of the game rather easily for someone playing an RPG where the reality is that some of us actually enjoy playing this game as it is designed, we like to level up characters, we like to do quests and roam around areas, we like to have to make the choices about when to level which skill and see how it pans out, we like to treat a character as a character rather than just one big account.

    Therefore to that type of player, of which I am one, choices about which quest to do or not do, which skill lines we may or may not choose to level and, yes, which shards we might or might not pursue are part of the pleasure of playing the game - a pleasure you seem keen to remove while insulting, by implication, those of us who actually enjoy playing.

    I'm just going to respond to your comment phrase by phrase.
    1. I'm not really sure how to respond to this. @Yadvo does it best but I honestly don't know where you pulled 46% from. Unless the polls spiked up from 30%, when I wrote my comment, to 46% then back down to 33%, which I doubt. A 2:1 ratio seems to indicate a clear majority/minority standing. I don't think you know how polls work so I'd suggest retaking those math classes buddy :).

    2. If you read closely, I am not saying that they are alike by practice but rather by principle. I was stating that if you look at any discussion that wants change to an annoying mechanic, there are going to be some people who do not want change (which is fine) under the basis that new players don't have to suffer to get the same things (which is not fine as that logic impedes improvement). Nowhere did I suggest any proposal to these discussions nor claim that they are problems with similar solutions.

    3. I am offended that you seem to think of me as some sort of RP hater (just look at some of my comments where I have defended RPers). However, this is an issue that affects the majority of players and these players want change. On previous skyshard posts and by talking to many people on Xbox NA, these people are dissatisfied with the current system so I am merely voicing their concerns. I wrote that last bit to say that those of you who do not want change to just think about the majority. You said it yourself, only some of you actually like skyshard hunting for various reasons. Do you think it's fair to make the majority dissatisfied while the few benefit? I am not bashing RPers; I am just saying to consider the other viewpoints instead of this narrow viewpoint you seem to have (though I doubt most RPers are this myopic). Sorry if this point seems a bit scathing, but I wrote this to prevent short-sighted comments (which your bit on not giving console players a skyshard map because it's on PC proves).

    4. Refer to my 3rd point but basically I never said to remove RP pleasures so stop putting words into my mouth.

    I've read your comments past this one and I honestly did not think that anyone would get offended so easily by my comment. I figured that I'd leave my two cents and maybe get an Agree or two. I apologize to making you think that I was bashing RPers, or negating opinions, or whatever. However, people who live in a glass house should not throw stones. Your comment deliberately falsified data, put words into my mouth, and insulted my education. Stop playing the role of the victim here.

    (Note that my insult to your education is more of a playful retort with little vinegar ;) ).
  • ManwithBeard9
    ManwithBeard9
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Skyshards are fine the way they are and should not be touched
    No
  • ProfesseurFreder
    ProfesseurFreder
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Skyshards are fine the way they are and should not be touched
    Ver crime out loud -- Just get yourself the "Skyshards" add-on and you're good to go.
    "Nothing by which all human passion and hope and folly can be mirrored and then proved ever was just a game."
    -- William Faulkner.
  • JWKe
    JWKe
    ✭✭✭✭
    Make the skyshards available account wide once you hit level 50. All those that you have not collected before you hit 50 but gathered on other characters at max level, then become available.
    For max level characters only. Folks who want to recollect them for whatever reason can go do so still however.
  • Niaver
    Niaver
    ✭✭✭✭
    I don't know the solution, but I can say it's really not fun to collect them for every character. To give all skyshards for lvl1 character would be a mistake as well.
    PC EU - Daggerfall Covenant - @Niaver
    Erazar (main) - Khajit DK tank

    Proud owner of Maelstrom Sharpened Bow
Sign In or Register to comment.