Am I the only one worried there is a forums poll where over 90% of the community voted the same thing?
Sneaky-Snurr wrote: »Is there a way to reverse my selection? I Didn't see bag space in the option I accidentally chose.
You ruined the perfect poll.Fruity_Ninja wrote: »Ooops.
I accidently clicked "no"
It's actually interesting because if those 50% who never upgraded are really active playes and not accounts played for a week and abandoned, then it proves that the forum is completely out of touch with the reality of the game - while we continuously accuse the devs of being the ones out of touch. That'd be quite an embarrassing revelation...Rev Rielle wrote: »We don't need a poll, we were given the facts in ESO Live. You don't need a sample when you know the population.
Bank and 12 characters maxed out.
Apparently I am one of the 3% of the playerbase that has done that. Seems a bit unbelievable that its that low.
.
I am really curious about how zos thinks...
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »The forum population isn't especially representative of the active player base. Having said that, I don't disagree with your statement that I've quoted. The forum population may not be especially representative of the active player base, but I'd agree that it's highly likely to be more representative of the active player base than where ZOS got the 50% statistic from.Stormahawk wrote: »This poll is more representative of the active player base than from where they got their 50% statistic from.
Unless we're really totally out of reality, and the vast majority of ESO players just uses the game as a big theme park for role playing, getting dressed, taking screenshots and playing "Sims in Tamriel" ?
I'm not ironic here. I'm rather quite puzzled by this statistic. Either ZOS think we're stupid and lies to us, or they've considered a totally inappropriate base for their statistics... or we as regular players/forumers have simply NO IDEA what the actual playerbase really looks like or really is ?
Bouldercleave wrote: »Where it the world did you come up with the stat that 50% of people haven't upgraded their bags or bank? That doesn't even seem possible.
We actually don't know if 97% is the right number. Does ZOS count alts? Abandoned accounts?
IcyDeadPeople wrote: »The more relevant number is the 97% of us who have never upgraded storage all the way to max.
This means for 97% of players, there is still more storage space we can buy with in-game gold or crowns. I suppose only 3% of players would be the primary prospects for buying that extra space beyond what is available from upgrading bank and backpack.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Bank and 12 characters maxed out.
Apparently I am one of the 3% of the playerbase that has done that. Seems a bit unbelievable that its that low.
.
It depends how it's calculated. I also have 12 chars, with bank maxed out and inventory maxed out on 8 of them. For the remaining 4 characters, I cannot possibly max them out quicker than the daily horse riding lesson ingame for each of them. It's limited to 1 per 20 hours per char. Unless I spend crowns for it, which I obviously don't want to.
So in my eyes, they are all "maxed out" because I've done all I could do without spending RL money. But 4 of them are not yet at 200 bag space. So they're not actually maxed out.
Now how did ZOS make this statistic ? Per character ? Per account ? If it is per account, then I don't belong to those 3% - even though inventory space IS my highest priority in the game and I've done everything I could on ALL my characters.
If it is calculated per character, then 8 of my chars belong to those 3% and 4 of my chars don't...
The truth is, you cannot really make any use or interpretation of any statistics if you don't know in detail the data used and the methodology behind it.