Prof_Bawbag wrote: »Was finishing up quests in Malabal Tor tonight and was doing that quest where you have to find instruments in some werewolf camp along with a spinner quest. Anyway, some guy just standing there letting werewolves beat down on him, but i needed behind them to get one of the instruments I needed for the quest, so did what anyone would do, clear the path. A minute later s/he whispered me and the convo went something like:
Other Person [OP] Leave me alone
Me: What? I'm doing quests in the area, so don't flatter yourself
Op: I'm trying to get a WW bite
Me: You're in the wrong zone, the last time I looked you could only get them in Reaper's March if you're wanting an npc to bite you
OP: Stop trolling me and wasting my time
Me: Ok, sorry meant no harm. Just warning you you're wasting your own time as it's not a case of just fighting any werewolf, it has to be specific werewolves, on a full moon, in a certain area.
OP: I'm reporting you
I wasn't abusive at all, never swore and other than the flattery comment I inserted into my first whisper, I thought I was actually being helpful. No doubt the person is still there attempting to get his WW bite.
That you're posting this on a forum as part of a pity party tells me that there's two sides to this story. I just wish people weren't shallow enough to fall for this sort of thing. Too many manipulators out there to know what's really going on any more, with motivations and agendas more varied than I could ever imagine.
I just question the motivation of making a thread about this in the first place, even. It doesn't exactly look good, does it? If you were really invested in helping them, you could have messaged them with a link explaining how the werewolf stuff worked and politely suggested they give it a look, if they want to, rather than posting this thread.
Like I said, two sides to every story. Seeing one on a forum isn't automatically convincing to me. It's more evident of a toxic personality that would do that sort of thing in the first place. At least you didn't name shame, I suppose.
Prof_Bawbag wrote: »...on a full moon...
Prof_Bawbag wrote: »...on a full moon...
You were trolling.
That you're posting this on a forum as part of a pity party tells me that there's two sides to this story. I just wish people weren't shallow enough to fall for this sort of thing. Too many manipulators out there to know what's really going on any more, with motivations and agendas more varied than I could ever imagine.
I just question the motivation of making a thread about this in the first place, even. It doesn't exactly look good, does it? If you were really invested in helping them, you could have messaged them with a link explaining how the werewolf stuff worked and politely suggested they give it a look, if they want to, rather than posting this thread.
Like I said, two sides to every story. Seeing one on a forum isn't automatically convincing to me. It's more evident of a toxic personality that would do that sort of thing in the first place. At least you didn't name shame, I suppose.
quite sure op was not trolling.
werewolves on full moon nights is quite oft quoted in the google results i found. it was believed that werewolves spawn on full moon nights, and bloodfiends spawn on other nights. but it was later on proven to be wrong, and most players are unaware of moon cycle anyway.

That you're posting this on a forum as part of a pity party tells me that there's two sides to this story. I just wish people weren't shallow enough to fall for this sort of thing. Too many manipulators out there to know what's really going on any more, with motivations and agendas more varied than I could ever imagine.
I just question the motivation of making a thread about this in the first place, even. It doesn't exactly look good, does it? If you were really invested in helping them, you could have messaged them with a link explaining how the werewolf stuff worked and politely suggested they give it a look, if they want to, rather than posting this thread.
Like I said, two sides to every story. Seeing one on a forum isn't automatically convincing to me. It's more evident of a toxic personality that would do that sort of thing in the first place. At least you didn't name shame, I suppose.
I'm inclined to agree. I see it as the illusion of altruism. Sometimes people do 'good' or 'nice' things expecting to be thanked for it. So they're not doing it altruistically really. They want to receive the self-satisfaction or some kind of good Samaritan award.
It may or may not be the case with the OP. But if he/she was truly out for the other persons good. He/she would not have cared if the person accepted or declined the advice. If somebody was doing something purely altruistically, they won't care if 'they can or can't be helped.'
I wouldn't go as far as to say it's a toxic personality, though.
Just that I think maybe some people haven't really learned the true meaning of selflessness.
I'm of the 'maybe he/she didn't need help, because I hate receiving unsolicited advice. It's a power display that always involves making someone submissive to the other's 'wisdom' and 'knowledge.' Even if I ended up trying to get a bite that didn't exist. Eventually, I would ask for help or look it up when I was ready.
Edit: I catch myself making that mistake sometimes. I do try to be mindful, by asking a person things like 'would you like the advice of an experienced crafter?' if they ask for 5 pieces of medium julianos or something.
The comment was meant more as a playful jab at the full moon comment, that rumor is a long time pet peeve of mine. I didn't really think you were intentionally trolling
The other pet peeve is people not knowing which mobs... In Bangkorai people have announced normal mobs as the ones that scratch daily for the past week, I assume it's continuous but I've only been farming there the last week.
I recently was scratched and took screens of it, never got around to posting. They were last out on Dec. 9th 7:30am... These where the two who did me in.
Prof_Bawbag wrote: »That you're posting this on a forum as part of a pity party tells me that there's two sides to this story. I just wish people weren't shallow enough to fall for this sort of thing. Too many manipulators out there to know what's really going on any more, with motivations and agendas more varied than I could ever imagine.
I just question the motivation of making a thread about this in the first place, even. It doesn't exactly look good, does it? If you were really invested in helping them, you could have messaged them with a link explaining how the werewolf stuff worked and politely suggested they give it a look, if they want to, rather than posting this thread.
Like I said, two sides to every story. Seeing one on a forum isn't automatically convincing to me. It's more evident of a toxic personality that would do that sort of thing in the first place. At least you didn't name shame, I suppose.
I'm inclined to agree. I see it as the illusion of altruism. Sometimes people do 'good' or 'nice' things expecting to be thanked for it. So they're not doing it altruistically really. They want to receive the self-satisfaction or some kind of good Samaritan award.
It may or may not be the case with the OP. But if he/she was truly out for the other persons good. He/she would not have cared if the person accepted or declined the advice. If somebody was doing something purely altruistically, they won't care if 'they can or can't be helped.'
I wouldn't go as far as to say it's a toxic personality, though.
Just that I think maybe some people haven't really learned the true meaning of selflessness.
I'm of the 'maybe he/she didn't need help, because I hate receiving unsolicited advice. It's a power display that always involves making someone submissive to the other's 'wisdom' and 'knowledge.' Even if I ended up trying to get a bite that didn't exist. Eventually, I would ask for help or look it up when I was ready.
Edit: I catch myself making that mistake sometimes. I do try to be mindful, by asking a person things like 'would you like the advice of an experienced crafter?' if they ask for 5 pieces of medium julianos or something.
Or some people read waaaaaaaaaaay too much in to things? That said, I posted on a public forum and as such I appreciate people who love nothing more than to over analyse any given trivial comment frequent any given public forum. From my pov, I wouldn't have wasted your time psychoanalysing me. I'm not really worth the effort. This will be forgotten about 5 minutes after you log out and no doubt AW has come to the same realisation.
Prof_Bawbag wrote: »That you're posting this on a forum as part of a pity party tells me that there's two sides to this story. I just wish people weren't shallow enough to fall for this sort of thing. Too many manipulators out there to know what's really going on any more, with motivations and agendas more varied than I could ever imagine.
I just question the motivation of making a thread about this in the first place, even. It doesn't exactly look good, does it? If you were really invested in helping them, you could have messaged them with a link explaining how the werewolf stuff worked and politely suggested they give it a look, if they want to, rather than posting this thread.
Like I said, two sides to every story. Seeing one on a forum isn't automatically convincing to me. It's more evident of a toxic personality that would do that sort of thing in the first place. At least you didn't name shame, I suppose.
I'm inclined to agree. I see it as the illusion of altruism. Sometimes people do 'good' or 'nice' things expecting to be thanked for it. So they're not doing it altruistically really. They want to receive the self-satisfaction or some kind of good Samaritan award.
It may or may not be the case with the OP. But if he/she was truly out for the other persons good. He/she would not have cared if the person accepted or declined the advice. If somebody was doing something purely altruistically, they won't care if 'they can or can't be helped.'
I wouldn't go as far as to say it's a toxic personality, though.
Just that I think maybe some people haven't really learned the true meaning of selflessness.
I'm of the 'maybe he/she didn't need help, because I hate receiving unsolicited advice. It's a power display that always involves making someone submissive to the other's 'wisdom' and 'knowledge.' Even if I ended up trying to get a bite that didn't exist. Eventually, I would ask for help or look it up when I was ready.
Edit: I catch myself making that mistake sometimes. I do try to be mindful, by asking a person things like 'would you like the advice of an experienced crafter?' if they ask for 5 pieces of medium julianos or something.
Or some people read waaaaaaaaaaay too much in to things? That said, I posted on a public forum and as such I appreciate people who love nothing more than to over analyse any given trivial comment frequent any given public forum. From my pov, I wouldn't have wasted your time psychoanalysing me. I'm not really worth the effort. This will be forgotten about 5 minutes after you log out and no doubt AW has come to the same realisation.
Ad hominem fallacy. Attack the person instead of the argument.
I'll just rephrase:
I believe that players should have the right and dignity to play the way that they want. Free of unsolicted advice. I have learned from my experience that players tend to be more receptive of advice when a person first asks if they would like it before giving. Using the words 'should' instead of 'could' give off a dictatorial vibe that can put a person on the defensive.
It looks like the player didn't trust your advice. Maybe you could have done something to change your approach?
Anyway, this will be my last post. It seems like you're not open to disagreement.
Prof_Bawbag wrote: »That you're posting this on a forum as part of a pity party tells me that there's two sides to this story. I just wish people weren't shallow enough to fall for this sort of thing. Too many manipulators out there to know what's really going on any more, with motivations and agendas more varied than I could ever imagine.
I just question the motivation of making a thread about this in the first place, even. It doesn't exactly look good, does it? If you were really invested in helping them, you could have messaged them with a link explaining how the werewolf stuff worked and politely suggested they give it a look, if they want to, rather than posting this thread.
Like I said, two sides to every story. Seeing one on a forum isn't automatically convincing to me. It's more evident of a toxic personality that would do that sort of thing in the first place. At least you didn't name shame, I suppose.
I'm inclined to agree. I see it as the illusion of altruism. Sometimes people do 'good' or 'nice' things expecting to be thanked for it. So they're not doing it altruistically really. They want to receive the self-satisfaction or some kind of good Samaritan award.
It may or may not be the case with the OP. But if he/she was truly out for the other persons good. He/she would not have cared if the person accepted or declined the advice. If somebody was doing something purely altruistically, they won't care if 'they can or can't be helped.'
I wouldn't go as far as to say it's a toxic personality, though.
Just that I think maybe some people haven't really learned the true meaning of selflessness.
I'm of the 'maybe he/she didn't need help, because I hate receiving unsolicited advice. It's a power display that always involves making someone submissive to the other's 'wisdom' and 'knowledge.' Even if I ended up trying to get a bite that didn't exist. Eventually, I would ask for help or look it up when I was ready.
Edit: I catch myself making that mistake sometimes. I do try to be mindful, by asking a person things like 'would you like the advice of an experienced crafter?' if they ask for 5 pieces of medium julianos or something.
Or some people read waaaaaaaaaaay too much in to things? That said, I posted on a public forum and as such I appreciate people who love nothing more than to over analyse any given trivial comment frequent any given public forum. From my pov, I wouldn't have wasted your time psychoanalysing me. I'm not really worth the effort. This will be forgotten about 5 minutes after you log out and no doubt AW has come to the same realisation.
Ad hominem fallacy. Attack the person instead of the argument.
I'll just rephrase:
I believe that players should have the right and dignity to play the way that they want. Free of unsolicted advice. I have learned from my experience that players tend to be more receptive of advice when a person first asks if they would like it before giving. Using the words 'should' instead of 'could' give off a dictatorial vibe that can put a person on the defensive.
It looks like the player didn't trust your advice. Maybe you could have done something to change your approach?
Anyway, this will be my last post. It seems like you're not open to disagreement.