Peekachu99 wrote: »Peekachu99 wrote: »Half the "revolutionaries" in this thread were supposed to have canceled their accounts by now. Unless you're all just playing the forums, which I doubt.
Adults have a responsibility to control their impulses, or, in the case of addiction and an inability to do so, they should possess the common sense to steer clear of enticing substances and events and to seek counselling on how to avoid those things.
The end.
...
Edit #2: Lagrue's post says it all. Close the thread.
He doesn't argue the crates, he argues the idea of ZoS preventing certain people from being able to acquire them in the first place.
To say all it takes is self control is just blatantly wrong and tells me you're not informed enough on the subject to talk about it. Even with counselling it can take many years to solve these issues. For some it will never entirely go away so if think people should "man up" or some bs like that based on how easily you can handle addictions, you'd be dead wrong.
I never said that. I even went on to mention counselling in the very quote you captioned. I'm not sure if you misquoted me or what. And that people continue to compare opening crown crates to something as serious as drug addiction (which was what Lagrue's post was about), shows how much hyperbole is occurring in this thread. When someone has cashed in their life savings, sold their kidneys on the Chinese Black market, lost their wife, home, dog and teeth because of Crown Crates, THEN, start drawing comparisions to drug use. I went as far as mentioning Casinos, and I felt I was stretching it. You people are going beyond the pale.
It's becoming an *** of the absurd. Enough is enough. Play the game or leave it be.
Could they not implement some sort of limit on how many crates one person is allowed to purchase on a weekly or monthly basis? It wouldn't stop those with a gambling problem from purchasing the crates, but it would at least ensure that they didn't go overboard... If they are going to introduce gambling into the game (which I personally find disappointing and rather seedy) they should at least be partly responsible for safeguarding any vulnerable people who could potentially be sucked in by it
Peekachu99 wrote: »Peekachu99 wrote: »Half the "revolutionaries" in this thread were supposed to have canceled their accounts by now. Unless you're all just playing the forums, which I doubt.
Adults have a responsibility to control their impulses, or, in the case of addiction and an inability to do so, they should possess the common sense to steer clear of enticing substances and events and to seek counselling on how to avoid those things.
The end.
...
Edit #2: Lagrue's post says it all. Close the thread.
He doesn't argue the crates, he argues the idea of ZoS preventing certain people from being able to acquire them in the first place.
To say all it takes is self control is just blatantly wrong and tells me you're not informed enough on the subject to talk about it. Even with counselling it can take many years to solve these issues. For some it will never entirely go away so if think people should "man up" or some bs like that based on how easily you can handle addictions, you'd be dead wrong.
I never said that. I even went on to mention counselling in the very quote you captioned. I'm not sure if you misquoted me or what. And that people continue to compare opening crown crates to something as serious as drug addiction (which was what Lagrue's post was about), shows how much hyperbole is occurring in this thread. When someone has cashed in their life savings, sold their kidneys on the Chinese Black market, lost their wife, home, dog and teeth because of Crown Crates, THEN, start drawing comparisions to drug use. I went as far as mentioning Casinos, and I felt I was stretching it. You people are going beyond the pale.
It's becoming an *** of the absurd. Enough is enough. Play the game or leave it be.
Which is exactly why I told you that "Even with counselling it can take many years". It's not enough to just see a counsellor and snap with your finger, nor does it come with being "adult". You go on to associate it with "common sense" and "responsibility" acting as if those people are some kind of idiots who aren't already trying to conquer their addictions. Your message has been very clear so don't act surprised.
"Play the game or leave it be." Wow, I must've not heard that a whole 3 minutes, how original and clever.