Does that mean it's being looked into?

Alucardo wrote: »

ZOS_JohanaB wrote: »

Several post have been removed for bumping, please only post constructive comments in the future. We've also moved this thread to Bug Reports

When you see a ZOS reply and come here expecting to see "we're getting it fixed", but get this instead

I know right

ZOS_JohanaB wrote: »

Several post have been removed for bumping, please only post constructive comments in the future. We've also moved this thread to Bug Reports

^ I was starting to hope that the guys actually updated us with info but apparently not...

This set was a bugged mess since day 1 anyway.

In the not too distant past, ZOS banned players who had used gap-closers in a way not intended by the developers. People were using gap closers to get into keeps. The behavior was wide-spread. ZOS released a forum post saying that it was against the rules, and then permanently banned players who had done it, even banning some who had used gap closers to enter keeps before the post was made.

This set is currently being used in cyrodiil in ways that seem equally unintentional as gap closer abuse.

On Monday, there was an organized raid at the Chalman gate, which dropped down to the second level and spammed shields, lobbing mortars to the top level and killing players through LOS.

I have witnessed two sorcs standing outside of fully in-tact keep walls, lobbing mortars inside.

I have been chased around resource towers, pulled out of cloak and had my location revealed clear on the opposite side.

I have been followed by large groups casting it when I attempt to disengage, which instantly reveals my location and wastes my magicka.

I have been in duels where the opponent switches into this gear after noting that I'm a nightblade, and using it for the express intention of keeping my stealth disabled.

I also have a sorcerer and could find some entertainment using this set, but my concern is that this does look similar in many ways to the gap closer abuse. As people were retroactively and permanently banned for that, I am very shy to use mechanics which can be arguably labeled an exploit.

ZOS has commented on many bugs, even with just, "this is not intended and we are looking into it", which goes a very long way in educating the playerbase on whether it is a feature or an exploit. Could we please have just a sentence letting us know?