Holycannoli wrote: »Even tho I think that all the hate towards this boxes is pretty shallow and stupid. I wouldn't buy anyone of them.
It's not shallow or stupid.
Imagine you want to buy a motorcycle you saw advertised. It's the best looking bike you've ever seen and demand is guaranteed to be high. You go to the shop and instead of being able to buy the motorcycle you instead buy a spin of a roulette wheel which costs about 1/4 what the bike costs (so if the bike is valued at $20,000, a spin is $5,000). There's a .4% chance you'll get the motorcycle, a 50% you'll get free sodas from the vending machine, a 20% chance of getting a voucher for some free riding lessons, 5% chance of getting a free paint job, and 1% chance of winning a guaranteed no down payment, best rate financing on another bike. They don't add up to 100% because the roulette wheel is digital and they don't disclose the actual chances.
What would you do? Spin the wheel until you get that bike or say screw them?
You can say the same thing with clothes. Imagine wanting to buy a new shirt or suit or dress or whatever, and the shop doesn't sell the clothes directly but instead sells a roulette wheel spin that has an extremely low chance of giving you the clothes you want and a much greater chance at giving you free drinks from the vending machine or some other crap you don't want.
Just sell us the items directly in the cash shop and don't make us gamble for them ZOS, or I promise you you'll feel the backlash as people quit and spread negative word-of-mouth.
if they release these on the PTS i'll buy a ton of them to see how often they drop something interesting, but with irl money i'm buying nada
AClockworkLime wrote: »Zero would be how many. Your inexplicable longing to be a sycophant notwithstanding.noxayloxub17_ESO wrote: »
phreatophile wrote: »A lot of it depends upon the odds and implementation. Still too many questions.
How many different items will be in the loot table?
The difference between 100 items and 500 is huge if a specific item is desired
How will they handle duplicates?
Will they just disappear because you already have one, can we sell them. If RNG spits out a mount you already have, does it default to low-stat garbage crown consumables, or does it re-roll for another mount? Depending on the answer to this question, players with more crown items may have an ever increasing chance of getting nothing but crap
How will the boxes be differentiated?
Will there be one kind of box for costumes and another for mounts? Will there be one box for discontinued items and another for exclusive items? Will there be different tiers offering greater and lesser odds?
At this point, I don't have enough information to decide if I'm going to buy a few here and there after a crown discount sale or give them the ten foot pole treatment.
phreatophile wrote: »A lot of it depends upon the odds and implementation. Still too many questions.
How many different items will be in the loot table?
The difference between 100 items and 500 is huge if a specific item is desired
How will they handle duplicates?
Will they just disappear because you already have one, can we sell them. If RNG spits out a mount you already have, does it default to low-stat garbage crown consumables, or does it re-roll for another mount? Depending on the answer to this question, players with more crown items may have an ever increasing chance of getting nothing but crap
How will the boxes be differentiated?
Will there be one kind of box for costumes and another for mounts? Will there be one box for discontinued items and another for exclusive items? Will there be different tiers offering greater and lesser odds?
At this point, I don't have enough information to decide if I'm going to buy a few here and there after a crown discount sale or give them the ten foot pole treatment.
DMuehlhausen wrote: »I marked 21+ cause if it's an awesome looking mount (to me) I'll put time and effort into it. If I don't like the look it would be 0.
SolarCat02 wrote: »I am not the gambling type, so zero.
Only exception would be if it had a guaranteed chance to drop a mount I didn't have, and I liked the majority of the possiblities.
DMuehlhausen wrote: »I marked 21+ cause if it's an awesome looking mount (to me) I'll put time and effort into it. If I don't like the look it would be 0.
000000000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000111111111111000000000000
000000000001111111111111100000000000
000000000011111110011111110000000000
000000000111111100001111111000000000
000000000111111000000111111000000000
000000000111111000000111111000000000
000000000111111000000111111000000000
000000000111111000000111111000000000
000000000111111000000111111000000000
000000000111111000000111111000000000
000000000111111000000111111000000000
000000000111111100001111111000000000
000000000001111111111111100000000000
000000000000111111111111000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000
dylanjaygrobbelaarb16_ESO wrote: »you need 0, if most players wouldnt buy lotter at all and one crazy person says they will spend 100's$ you dont think thats important?
every comment is 0 thats what you get for a *** biased poll
starkerealm wrote: »
I'm not sure if you are aware of it yet, they are cosmetic only you know? They don't affect the gameplay at all! Like none. It would be a predatory model if they add p2w itens, which is not the case.
Different items effect (affect?) people's enjoyment of a game differently. Personally for me, I would actually hate this idea less if it was VMSA weapons in those lockboxes (no, don't take that out of context, I don't think it's a good idea to ever put weapons etc. in the crown store, just making a point here), as that wouldn't matter at all to me. I don't play competitively, the rare times I PvP it really doesn't matter - that person will kill me with or without a fancy weapon (lol). I thing I DO love about the game is being able to change my outfit to fit the mood, change my mount to match the scenery and mission etc. So for me, I care much more about cosmetic items being locked away behind a lottery box. It doesn't change competitive play, but it does affect how I play the game.
^ This.
However, if these exclusive mounts are actually the skeleton ones, I don't really care cause they are ugly and I wouldn't buy them anyway. But I'm really sad that I will never have a chance to get the Frostmare if so-called RNG boxes will be the only way to get the previously released limited time offers. I'm not only angry and sad, I'm extremely disappointed with the direction in which the clown store goes... It frightens me that the people who created the game I love so much, they are now killing it. If these are the same people at all...
nimander99 wrote: »DMuehlhausen wrote: »I marked 21+ cause if it's an awesome looking mount (to me) I'll put time and effort into it. If I don't like the look it would be 0.
So what you are saying is you would potentially be okay with spending possibly a thousand if not two thousand dollars to get a skin you think would look cool?