lonewolf26 wrote: »Permantnely banning someone for showing you where your software is not working is irresponsible of a developer. You need to gauge intent before laying down the ban hammer.
Brittany_Joy wrote: »To be honest. You have to farm for the salvation set, which in itself is intent to exploit.
MaxwellCrystal wrote: »The players shouldn't be banned regardless unless there's a statement on the games launch screen or somewhere in the game stating not to use this set or risk your account being banned. Not all players check the forums out so outright banning them to me is not justifiable.
Imagine if your state implemented a law stating you could not spit anywhere unless it's your home/trash areas and you were caught spitting but there's no sign stating that it's against the law. The question is how would you feel especially if the penalty was you have to go do 3 months of community service and pay a fine of 1,000$, it would be unfair and unjust since the lack the new law being advertised.
orangeman57ub17_ESO wrote: »From what certain individuals claim I think they atleast deserve some investigation.
Brittany_Joy wrote: »To be honest. You have to farm for the salvation set, which in itself is intent to exploit.
I actually had a full set stashed away long before it bugged out ...
So let me get this straight... People made posts and threads about why ZOS isn't more harsh and strict about enforcing their policies about cheating/exploiting... And now you all are saying that ZOS went overboard? What? Lmao. No. Absolutely not. Let these players remain banned and for good. Cut the crap, and knock it off. It's just getting plain silly. I understand we are all entitled to our opinions, and I respect that understanding — but come on. This is ridiculous. If you cheat or exploit? You get banned. It's that simple.
This time may have sent a message now that players will be too scared to do anything about the next serious exploit that makes it to live, especially if they do attempt to report it and that report goes unheard.
These bi-polar reactions aren't healthy in the long run.
starkerealm wrote: »It's still BOP, right?I actually had a full set stashed away long before it bugged out ...Brittany_Joy wrote: »To be honest. You have to farm for the salvation set, which in itself is intent to exploit.
Brittany_Joy wrote: »To be honest. You have to farm for the salvation set, which in itself is intent to exploit. But permaban for using ingame gear is overkill. But it was a known exploit so no sympathy from meh.
I understand your empathy because these are your friends, but motive is irrelevant.
But I did it for reasons is irrelevant. It is not their job nor responsibility to send in complete parses of a boss fight on a live server for 'TESTING'.
PERM ban means nothing to zos though so just appeal. My opinion is van should stay, don't use broken gear.
antihero727 wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »Unsent.Soul wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »More than that, we knew this was broken on PTS, as I recall. Going on live and testing it there when you've got PTS access is just, an incomprehensibly stupid idea.
Kind of like the fact that there were certain things fixed in the latest PTS but they chose a different patch version to send for auth. And now people are stuck with bugs that were originally fixed for the pts, but not now?
Yeah, but there is a huge difference between putting on a broken set on live and realizing it's still broken, and "testing" an exploit on multiple Bloodspawn runs. If you're testing on live, that's always a bad idea.
Then PTS should have an everything vendor
So let me get this straight... People made posts and threads about why ZOS isn't more harsh and strict about enforcing their policies about cheating/exploiting... And now you all are saying that ZOS went overboard? What? Lmao. No. Absolutely not. Let these players remain banned and for good. Cut the crap, and knock it off. It's just getting plain silly. I understand we are all entitled to our opinions, and I respect that understanding — but come on. This is ridiculous. If you cheat or exploit? You get banned. It's that simple.
starkerealm wrote: »It's still BOP, right?I actually had a full set stashed away long before it bugged out ...Brittany_Joy wrote: »To be honest. You have to farm for the salvation set, which in itself is intent to exploit.
I don't even remember. I thought it was BOE but i may be wrong ...
brandelwine wrote: »So let me get this straight... People made posts and threads about why ZOS isn't more harsh and strict about enforcing their policies about cheating/exploiting... And now you all are saying that ZOS went overboard? What? Lmao. No. Absolutely not. Let these players remain banned and for good. Cut the crap, and knock it off. It's just getting plain silly. I understand we are all entitled to our opinions, and I respect that understanding — but come on. This is ridiculous. If you cheat or exploit? You get banned. It's that simple.
...I would like to see the forum post this person would make when they get banned for wearing a set they didn't even know was broken and then gets no response from ZOS to their appeal. And yes, this is happening. Except you wouldn't even be able to make a forum post--your forum account is banned when your account is banned so you are left with no voice, no way to defend yourself.
Your only recourse is to hope that you have friends in the community that will stand up for you and speak out.
Bisenberger96 wrote: »Lol..it blows my mind that some people are actually defending ZOS (who has an awful reputation when it comes to banning and unbanning players) and assuming the 2 players Java is talking about who were banned for using this set were using it for personal gain.
starkerealm wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »It's still BOP, right?I actually had a full set stashed away long before it bugged out ...Brittany_Joy wrote: »To be honest. You have to farm for the salvation set, which in itself is intent to exploit.
I don't even remember. I thought it was BOE but i may be wrong ...
The old version was BoP, I think. I mean, it's been a long time, and I ended up deconing my pieces ages ago... but still.
I understand your empathy because these are your friends, but motive is irrelevant.
But I did it for reasons is irrelevant. It is not their job nor responsibility to send in complete parses of a boss fight on a live server for 'TESTING'.
PERM ban means nothing to zos though so just appeal. My opinion is van should stay, don't use broken gear.
Thanks Yoda, they have appealed and have got no where thus I started the forum.
And that is relevant how exactly? Are you expecting "special treatment" because you have streamed the game?I streamed your game and have been involved in the in game community for a long time.
And for what it's worth, i also tested the set when i first heard rumors of the bug and exploit and i wasn't banned.
Something smells fishy ...
lonewolf26 wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »It's still BOP, right?I actually had a full set stashed away long before it bugged out ...Brittany_Joy wrote: »To be honest. You have to farm for the salvation set, which in itself is intent to exploit.
I don't even remember. I thought it was BOE but i may be wrong ...
The old version was BoP, I think. I mean, it's been a long time, and I ended up deconing my pieces ages ago... but still.
It was bind on equip. I remember putting some old vet pieces of this set into a guild bank many months back.
HeroOfNone wrote: »I'd say a permanent ban was too harsh if this went down how you say, but I still question it.
I only have your word @JavaWho, who heard it from them that they only used this set once in Vet Spindleclutch and Rawl Kha. ZOS, since they won't name or shame, can't fight a battle of public opinion unless someone comes forward with a different story on a different forum. I just hope they are being honest with you and not only giving half the story.
Part of my skepticism comes from how many complained about how easy it is to get out of a ban by contacting customer support and apologizing. Those not unbanned typically had a history of issues, they are rude when they contact support, or they blatently exploited something to the point of abuse. I don't know the two involved though, so I can't judge their character, just the facts presented.
So if this is their first offense and it was limited to 2 PVE experiences like this, a warning would have sufficed. If they told a half truth and did use this in PVP, a suspension for a few days seems fair. If they had a history of exploiting things, a permanent ban might be in order until they come back and apologize. That's my opinion though, I'm sure ZOS has its own evidence and policy on how they ban folks now.
meanwhile I hope they have called customer support or emailed to try and appeal this ban. if its as easy as they say they could be out in hours.
Regardless of what players where doing this set, players should not be perma banned for using a bugged set that was left in the game. One of the players who was banned posted a video of him killing Bloodspawn within a matter of seconds to show how broken the set was, which eventually let to ZoS hotfixing it the next day. ZoS really needs to rethink the way they handle exploits and cheats. Why is it that players who used Cheat Engine are able to get their permanent bans reversed after they used 3rd party software to cheat and claim the number 1 spot on multiple leaderboards, while players, who used a bug set for 1 hour to show the community how broken it is, are permanently banned without even a warning?
@ZOS_GinaBruno @ZOS_JessicaFolsom