mdylan2013 wrote: »I've just achieved Master Angler on my main, I can't wait to fish my butt off to get it on the other 11 characters.
I was skeptical there was people who enjoyed pain in this world. No longer.
No to account-wide titles or achievements, it would be totally inappropriate for my characters who all do different things and whose leveling up through the game on an individual basis is the whole reason I play them. If I could, I would disable account-wide dye unlocks and champion points.
I would love to see certain things be made account wide. Things like undaunted skill level, PVP rank, titles, ACHIEVEMENTS, etc.
Undaunted is a bit annoying to level because you are limited to people who only want gold pledges essentially.
PvP ranks are very difficult to level up. I have personally never had a "high" PvP rank (14 is my max) but I think it would be beneficial for people who have higher ranks and want to make a new character.
Titles and achievements I think are a no brainer. Especially now that groups are so particular about who they let in...even for gold pledges. Being able to show that you have in fact beaten whatever PvE content makes that easier.
TheDarkRuler wrote: »Behold my level 3 Champion of Maelstrom warrior.
Such skillz.
Title says it all, we have account wide mounts, pets, costumes etc all earned by one character but shared on ur entire account so plz ZOS do the same with titles. .....n maybe in game achievements, especially considering Xbox n Playstation achievements/trophies are alrdy account wide lol, jus kinda makes sense.
TheDarkRuler wrote: »Behold my level 3 Champion of Maelstrom warrior.
Such skillz.
VizigothAlaric wrote: »Titles hell no...
Achievements, riding skills, skyshards hell YES
Daemons_Bane wrote: »Shared skyshards.? That's a new one
I don't particularly care about achievements, but for everyone saying their characters are unique and that their characters achieved things individually, I for one feel like I achieved things as a player, not as a character, so as far as I'm concerned the more account-wide the better.
DeadlyRecluse wrote: »As much as I'd like "Former Empress" on my actual main, this isn't a great idea. At least not for ALL titles. Things that actually depend on knowing the class and playing it well should be character bound. Timesink titles (Master Angler, Tamriel Hero, General Executioner), sure.
TheDarkRuler wrote: »Behold my level 3 Champion of Maelstrom warrior.
Such skillz.
DeadlyRecluse wrote: »As much as I'd like "Former Empress" on my actual main, this isn't a great idea. At least not for ALL titles. Things that actually depend on knowing the class and playing it well should be character bound. Timesink titles (Master Angler, Tamriel Hero, General Executioner), sure.
TheDarkRuler wrote: »Behold my level 3 Champion of Maelstrom warrior.
Such skillz.
If you bought the account that would make sense, otherwise the skill comes from the player playing the account not the toon if im not mistaken.
Anyway I would vote yes, I'm kind of "stuck" on my DK because i really do not want to go get all those achievements even though I would like to play a templar / healer. So yes to achievements and titles account wide, you got them yourself so you shown the skill doesnt matter which class you used.
I wonder if the same ppl saying "No to account wide titles" are the same ones that said "No to the veteran rank removal" and "No to the account wide champion point system" but now they praise and embrace it lol. Jus sayin... its the person's personal skill level that earned the achievement n title itself not the character. Account wide titles ZOS make it happen!
Wut? Really? Why this is not the case in PC? Would ease my life so much. Can't understand why so many people are against this. You are not getting the titles and achievements for free. You still have to work for them but now you don't have to do everything 8 times.Xbox n Playstation achievements/trophies are alrdy account wide lol, jus kinda makes sense.