Im not sure if the basis of comparison is how strong they where (OP) or how strong compaired to other classes. 2 of us where completely destroyed by a sorc in the sewers tonight. They used mobility, cced with ice staff, timed hits and used meteor or soul assault. I even timed his shield cast 4 seconds foss/dbos as shield dropped.
Think the best quote i have heard is the good ones will still wreck, the bad ones get rekt.
cosmic_niklas_93b16_ESO wrote: »
shoes and apples... There are still many sorcs around but way too many magplars.
People tend to play the easiest classes and now sorc is not the easiest anymore.
Sorc was never as popular and predominant as DKs were pre 1.6 or NBs afterwards and Magplars are now - so what´s the point exactly?
Im not sure if the basis of comparison is how strong they where (OP) or how strong compaired to other classes. 2 of us where completely destroyed by a sorc in the sewers tonight. They used mobility, cced with ice staff, timed hits and used meteor or soul assault. I even timed his shield cast 4 seconds foss/dbos as shield dropped.
Think the best quote i have heard is the good ones will still wreck, the bad ones get rekt.
And yet another player with the lack of ability to understand that it´s not about sorcs underperforming currently but simply that they are the most one dimensional class when specced magica and not fun to play.
Sorcs have been the least mained class in the last pvp-class poll and that was before DB update. The class did not improve since then:
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/266957/pvp-what-class-do-you-main/p1
Sorcerer is the only class that is sub 20%. That is a huge difference compared to ANY other class and it was BEFORE the DB nerfs to class when sorcs where considered op. If players really always take the road of least resistance there would have been more sorcs to begin with. Now there are even less (atleast for magica).
It´s a problem with the classes design philosophy not with the resulting performance. It´s simply not fun to play.
Strider_Roshin wrote: »You know what changed about magicka sorcs last update? The talented ones became stronger. The unskilled ones became trash.
cosmic_niklas_93b16_ESO wrote: »
shoes and apples... There are still many sorcs around but way too many magplars.
People tend to play the easiest classes and now sorc is not the easiest anymore.
Sorc was never as popular and predominant as DKs were pre 1.6 or NBs afterwards and Magplars are now - so what´s the point exactly?
i quoted someone, there is my point. 1.6 was Magsorc and NB time. That's what i talk about.
And No! There surely were as many sorcs as there are magplars now!Im not sure if the basis of comparison is how strong they where (OP) or how strong compaired to other classes. 2 of us where completely destroyed by a sorc in the sewers tonight. They used mobility, cced with ice staff, timed hits and used meteor or soul assault. I even timed his shield cast 4 seconds foss/dbos as shield dropped.
Think the best quote i have heard is the good ones will still wreck, the bad ones get rekt.
And yet another player with the lack of ability to understand that it´s not about sorcs underperforming currently but simply that they are the most one dimensional class when specced magica and not fun to play.
Sorcs have been the least mained class in the last pvp-class poll and that was before DB update. The class did not improve since then:
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/266957/pvp-what-class-do-you-main/p1
Sorcerer is the only class that is sub 20%. That is a huge difference compared to ANY other class and it was BEFORE the DB nerfs to class when sorcs where considered op. If players really always take the road of least resistance there would have been more sorcs to begin with. Now there are even less (atleast for magica).
It´s a problem with the classes design philosophy not with the resulting performance. It´s simply not fun to play.
That i understand but Sorc community doesn't ask for that, they just cry and say they are underperforming, so i guess u have to do a thread on that topic! I'd support it, because even i am bored of sorc gameplay when facing them.
cosmic_niklas_93b16_ESO wrote: »
shoes and apples... There are still many sorcs around but way too many magplars.
People tend to play the easiest classes and now sorc is not the easiest anymore.
Sorc was never as popular and predominant as DKs were pre 1.6 or NBs afterwards and Magplars are now - so what´s the point exactly?
i quoted someone, there is my point. 1.6 was Magsorc and NB time. That's what i talk about.
And No! There surely were as many sorcs as there are magplars now!
That i understand but Sorc community doesn't ask for that, they just cry and say they are underperforming, so i guess u have to do a thread on that topic! I'd support it, because even i am bored of sorc gameplay when facing them.
I think you might be right. Really good sorc players still wreck face on their sorcs. But I was one of those "unskilled" sorcs, just about average and I found playing in DB PVP to be not fun anymore. I could still fight 1v1 and do okay but the open world PVP experience is never that. Instead my experience was: I get stunned near the end of my 6s shield, the new poisons and penetration mechanics drain all my stam when I CC break, get hit by hit by 3 poison injections from stealth, I can refresh shield but can't bar swap, no stam to dodge roll anymore and then it's just a trip to dead town from there. It's either this, or I can stay behind a zerg nuking from the back - a lot of AP that way for sure but too boring for my taste.Strider_Roshin wrote: »You know what changed about magicka sorcs last update? The talented ones became stronger. The unskilled ones became trash.
TotallyNotVos wrote: »Magicka sorcs are perfectly balanced in pve with all of the other magicka classes. We can pull the exact same dps they can. And in pvp if you know what youre doing you can still easily perform.
it is SORC for God Sick
- it is based on magic and that leads to it MAGICKA...
- so it should be the best of the MAGICKA CLASS...
BUT,
-as Skills , Magicka sustains , Magicka Pool and now as DPS Based on MAGIC it is the worst MAGICKA CLASS!!!
i cant stand the idea and THE FACT that STAMSORC is better than the ACTUAL MAGICKA BASED SORC... that is SAD... BUT TRUE ALSO
- And the other thing is that it is like bound to DestroStaff like it has no magic power:)...thats SAD ALSO even tho it can reach it is highest spell damage with Dual SWORDS that is another SAD..:)...
- LATELY no one is prefers to play or play togeter with MAGICKA SORC not in Dungeons not in Trials everybodys Says that it is DPS and Time LOST for a higher SCORES to achive...They are right tho Sorcs have No DPS no Support as SORCERER... even they need others to support it to achive it is avarage DPS:)...
- One other thing is that HOW IS THE LORE I CANT UNDERSTAND!!! A Tank and Heal Classes are making MORE DPS than the ACTUAL DPS Classes!!!
so pls noone says that magicka sorc is awesome NO!!! it is liker a kid who need supports everywhere in game to be able to make somethings...
Thank you...
TotallyNotVos wrote: »Magicka sorcs are perfectly balanced in pve with all of the other magicka classes. We can pull the exact same dps they can. And in pvp if you know what youre doing you can still easily perform.
I keep hearing that. The best players will perform the best with anything, even a naked Magicka DK. Sorc however is hostile to average players. It'd be nice if they gave us a few quality of life improvements to make the class easier to play for everyone, not the select few.
Bad and average sorc players all rolled Templar, and they're doing objectively better because of it. What does that say about sorc?
I'm doing 'good' with the new setup, but the investment of time and gear into this spec has been incredible. I dare say I could do better with an under geared Magicka Templar with less CP, fewer skill points, and no undaunted or Mage guild passives. Is that right or fair?
But hey, the dozen or so amazing sorcs are still killing everyone, so. It must be balanced. XD I guess all of the skilled nightblades and dragon Knights are terrible by comparison...
cosmic_niklas_93b16_ESO wrote: »When will you make sorcs good again, ZoS? They've been murdered ever since the dark brotherhood came and went on a killing spree against them.
reclaimervii.sierra117ub17_ESO wrote: »cosmic_niklas_93b16_ESO wrote: »When will you make sorcs good again, ZoS? They've been murdered ever since the dark brotherhood came and went on a killing spree against them.
Sorcs are in Okay spot atm, Mag DKs need a buff
IxskullzxI wrote: »
TotallyNotVos wrote: »Magicka sorcs are perfectly balanced in pve with all of the other magicka classes. We can pull the exact same dps they can. And in pvp if you know what youre doing you can still easily perform.
I keep hearing that. The best players will perform the best with anything, even a naked Magicka DK. Sorc however is hostile to average players. It'd be nice if they gave us a few quality of life improvements to make the class easier to play for everyone, not the select few.
Bad and average sorc players all rolled Templar, and they're doing objectively better because of it. What does that say about sorc?
I'm doing 'good' with the new setup, but the investment of time and gear into this spec has been incredible. I dare say I could do better with an under geared Magicka Templar with less CP, fewer skill points, and no undaunted or Mage guild passives. Is that right or fair?
But hey, the dozen or so amazing sorcs are still killing everyone, so. It must be balanced. XD I guess all of the skilled nightblades and dragon Knights are terrible by comparison...