gamerguy757 wrote: »IS this only on PC or on consoles as well?
Force-Siphon wrote: »the person who scored a 597k score was the first person in NA to get flawless conqueror so idk how can you prove anything anyway.
Force-Siphon wrote: »It wasn't 29 minutes and all I'm saying is there is no way to prove anything and I'm pretty sure the holier than thou pve players are also doing runs on other people's accts so....
Force-Siphon wrote: »the person who scored a 597k score was the first person in NA to get flawless conqueror so idk how can you prove anything anyway.
Force-Siphon wrote: »It wasn't 29 minutes and all I'm saying is there is no way to prove anything and I'm pretty sure the holier than thou pve players are also doing runs on other people's accts so....
DisgracefulMind wrote: »Force-Siphon wrote: »the person who scored a 597k score was the first person in NA to get flawless conqueror so idk how can you prove anything anyway.
No he wasn't.
EDIT: He may have been first NA, I don't remember. @Nifty2g would know better than me.
But Flawless doesn't mean anything on competitive scores, so there's that.
Force-Siphon wrote: »the person who scored a 597k score was the first person in NA to get flawless conqueror so idk how can you prove anything anyway.

Force-Siphon wrote: »It wasn't 29 minutes and all I'm saying is there is no way to prove anything and I'm pretty sure the holier than thou pve players are also doing runs on other people's accts so....
If you lost the weekly because 1 or 2 people used some sort of cheat, your reward was not that garanteed to begin with.
Tough luck, i say. Better luck next week, get a higher position, that usually helps
@DDuke I sent ZOS a video of a legit run from Streak One to show the amount of effort and practice you need to put in for reference to anyone I'm reporting who suddenly pop up out of no where to red light them.KoshkaMurka wrote: »It's kind of hard to get any video evidence of these cheaters cheating though
Here's a post from another thread:597935 on the Sorcerer VMA is the main reason a leaderboard reset is in order. That score is impossible to obtain, to those who don't know Streak One currently #2 his run was 40 minutes and his score is 575102. The person ahead of him has that 597k which means that run was 29minutes. I don't believe that is possible at all unless you are spamming free cost Overload.zerosingularity wrote: »ZOS_DaryaK wrote: »Thank you for raising this issue, we are investigating this issue. In the meantime, please continue to use the in-game report function to report players who are using any kind of exploit and refrain from posting names or videos showing names on these forums.
Sorry, but until the players see proof that such things as exploiting and hacking are dealt with appropriately (no 3-day ban crap but perma-ban/character deletion) then naming and shaming of exploiters/hackers will and should still happen.
Remember, exploiters/hackers have no rights, only the innocent do.
Looks like we will need a leaderboard reset this next DLC, at this rate.
So it seems like cheaters are getting very unrealistic scores.
Yeah, I agree... those kind of scores popping up right now are unlikely to be a coincidence. But there's always the "what if" angle that ZOS is probably going to consider when there is no video proof of the cheater.
In PvP it's easy to gather evidence, in PvE... when it's just the cheaters in the dungeon - not that easy.
Maybe leaderboards should just be rolled back a couple of days & disabled until this issue is fixed.
ZOS gave the formula for how scoring worksForce-Siphon wrote: »It wasn't 29 minutes and all I'm saying is there is no way to prove anything and I'm pretty sure the holier than thou pve players are also doing runs on other people's accts so....
Nope, he wasn't the first either. I believe that was Dymence back on PTS and Cascaid got it on NA or someone else, I don't remember the name.DisgracefulMind wrote: »Force-Siphon wrote: »the person who scored a 597k score was the first person in NA to get flawless conqueror so idk how can you prove anything anyway.
No he wasn't.
EDIT: He may have been first NA, I don't remember. @Nifty2g would know better than me.
But Flawless doesn't mean anything on competitive scores, so there's that.
AdmiralSam wrote: »ZOS needs to analyze all their scores (they have the data) and figure out who cheated and who didn't. I was in a guild whose members BLATANTLY exploited this. I left when one of them (SHALL NOT BE NAMED- Chief) linked a 36k parse on the stage 6 boss, all proud.
Nothing. Nothing at all. But don't you dare name names, or you'll have your thread locked.
I doubt anything will happen. You'll just be S.O.L. and forced to take it on the chin. But @daemonios has said, you drop a name and kiss your thread goodbye. Why? Because that's how ZOS treats its community.
ZOS better put the foot down on this
Although in the meantime, those who exploited should have a KOS bounty until ZOS can get back to them in my opinion.