SlayerTheDragon wrote: »Let's put this topic in the bag now.
SlayerTheDragon wrote: »Let's put this topic in the bag now.
L O Lhydrocynus wrote: »Sunburnt_Penguin wrote: »You create a post asking a question to which there's "no valid answer" and you tell people to "get over it and move on".hydrocynus wrote: »Sunburnt_Penguin wrote: »Nothing will be said here that hasn't been said on other posts. Move along, folks.
@Sunburnt_Penguin therefore no one has answered this question in other threads because there is no valid answer.
Conclusion: crafting bags give no advantage and so I agree. Get over it people and move on.
Do you not see the irony in that?
Yes I Do. Because I know there is no answer to the question. That is why I asked it.
Sunburnt_Penguin wrote: »L O Lhydrocynus wrote: »Sunburnt_Penguin wrote: »You create a post asking a question to which there's "no valid answer" and you tell people to "get over it and move on".hydrocynus wrote: »Sunburnt_Penguin wrote: »Nothing will be said here that hasn't been said on other posts. Move along, folks.
@Sunburnt_Penguin therefore no one has answered this question in other threads because there is no valid answer.
Conclusion: crafting bags give no advantage and so I agree. Get over it people and move on.
Do you not see the irony in that?
Yes I Do. Because I know there is no answer to the question. That is why I asked it.
O
L
You obviously don't see the irony.
Here's the chain of events, you:
1. Create a thread and ask multiple questions
2. Say that "there is no valid answer"
3. Tell people to "get over it and move on"
4. Admit that you asked a question to which there's no answer.
So in order to help you out; the irony is that 1. completely contradicts 3.
Here's what you should have done:
1. Not create a thread to further incite a discussion in which you want people to "get over it and move on"
2. Reply to those people in the existing threads that claim it's P2W simply asking "why is it P2W?" and then give your opinion on why you don't think it is.
But it's so fetch.Tommy1979AtWar wrote: »Sunburnt_Penguin wrote: »L O Lhydrocynus wrote: »Sunburnt_Penguin wrote: »You create a post asking a question to which there's "no valid answer" and you tell people to "get over it and move on".hydrocynus wrote: »Sunburnt_Penguin wrote: »Nothing will be said here that hasn't been said on other posts. Move along, folks.
@Sunburnt_Penguin therefore no one has answered this question in other threads because there is no valid answer.
Conclusion: crafting bags give no advantage and so I agree. Get over it people and move on.
Do you not see the irony in that?
Yes I Do. Because I know there is no answer to the question. That is why I asked it.
O
L
You obviously don't see the irony.
Here's the chain of events, you:
1. Create a thread and ask multiple questions
2. Say that "there is no valid answer"
3. Tell people to "get over it and move on"
4. Admit that you asked a question to which there's no answer.
So in order to help you out; the irony is that 1. completely contradicts 3.
Here's what you should have done:
1. Not create a thread to further incite a discussion in which you want people to "get over it and move on"
2. Reply to those people in the existing threads that claim it's P2W simply asking "why is it P2W?" and then give your opinion on why you don't think it is.
Don't be mean Regina, it's not fair to enter a discussion with logic and reasoning on your side.
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »This is one of the unfortunate sides of the P2W term. It gets thrown around even when it does not apply.
Easy, you PAY zose your hard earned cash for something of no real life value. They WIN. P2W derp
Sunburnt_Penguin wrote: »L O Lhydrocynus wrote: »Sunburnt_Penguin wrote: »You create a post asking a question to which there's "no valid answer" and you tell people to "get over it and move on".hydrocynus wrote: »Sunburnt_Penguin wrote: »Nothing will be said here that hasn't been said on other posts. Move along, folks.
@Sunburnt_Penguin therefore no one has answered this question in other threads because there is no valid answer.
Conclusion: crafting bags give no advantage and so I agree. Get over it people and move on.
Do you not see the irony in that?
Yes I Do. Because I know there is no answer to the question. That is why I asked it.
O
L
You obviously don't see the irony.
Here's the chain of events, you:
1. Create a thread and ask multiple questions
2. Say that "there is no valid answer"
3. Tell people to "get over it and move on"
4. Admit that you asked a question to which there's no answer.
So in order to help you out; the irony is that 1. completely contradicts 3.
Here's what you should have done:
1. Not create a thread to further incite a discussion in which you want people to "get over it and move on"
2. Reply to those people in the existing threads that claim it's P2W simply asking "why is it P2W?" and then give your opinion on why you don't think it is.
Where did I say the same thing as you?hydrocynus wrote: »Is amazing how we all want to fight with each other when we are all saying the same thing.Sunburnt_Penguin wrote: »L O Lhydrocynus wrote: »Sunburnt_Penguin wrote: »You create a post asking a question to which there's "no valid answer" and you tell people to "get over it and move on".hydrocynus wrote: »Sunburnt_Penguin wrote: »Nothing will be said here that hasn't been said on other posts. Move along, folks.
@Sunburnt_Penguin therefore no one has answered this question in other threads because there is no valid answer.
Conclusion: crafting bags give no advantage and so I agree. Get over it people and move on.
Do you not see the irony in that?
Yes I Do. Because I know there is no answer to the question. That is why I asked it.
O
L
You obviously don't see the irony.
Here's the chain of events, you:
1. Create a thread and ask multiple questions
2. Say that "there is no valid answer"
3. Tell people to "get over it and move on"
4. Admit that you asked a question to which there's no answer.
So in order to help you out; the irony is that 1. completely contradicts 3.
Here's what you should have done:
1. Not create a thread to further incite a discussion in which you want people to "get over it and move on"
2. Reply to those people in the existing threads that claim it's P2W simply asking "why is it P2W?" and then give your opinion on why you don't think it is.
Why are you arguing with me when you are saying the same thing as me?
Lucius_Aelius wrote: »Who even said they were pay to win? I've read about (and said) a fair amount of criticism about their implementation, but that's a new one to me. They're a Game-changer for sure, in a big way, but you can get by without them and still be competitive, it just takes more work. Therefore, not pay to win.
The legitimate complaint is that it's not fair to non-subscribers, and as much as subscribing needed a boost to make it worthwhile, this was way too much and is something that absolutely shouldn't be exclusive, but rather offered for sale in the Crown Store as well. I'm all for making ESO+ worth the money, but you can't just give Subscribers any random perk and say it's fair just because they don't get enough. In this case it's absolutely not fair in the slightest, crafting bags may not be necessary to play but they will fundamentally alter the way people who have them play significantly for the better and anyone willing to pay (with either payment model) deserves to have them, and they should find a way to give ESO+ members a bonus that doesn't screw over anyone who pays for DLC's outright.

hydrocynus wrote: »Lucius_Aelius wrote: »Who even said they were pay to win? I've read about (and said) a fair amount of criticism about their implementation, but that's a new one to me. They're a Game-changer for sure, in a big way, but you can get by without them and still be competitive, it just takes more work. Therefore, not pay to win.
The legitimate complaint is that it's not fair to non-subscribers, and as much as subscribing needed a boost to make it worthwhile, this was way too much and is something that absolutely shouldn't be exclusive, but rather offered for sale in the Crown Store as well. I'm all for making ESO+ worth the money, but you can't just give Subscribers any random perk and say it's fair just because they don't get enough. In this case it's absolutely not fair in the slightest, crafting bags may not be necessary to play but they will fundamentally alter the way people who have them play significantly for the better and anyone willing to pay (with either payment model) deserves to have them, and they should find a way to give ESO+ members a bonus that doesn't screw over anyone who pays for DLC's outright.
I don't care about your plight to get crafting bags. You have your own threads to discuss that. This thread is not about that. Go away.
Lucius_Aelius wrote: »hydrocynus wrote: »Lucius_Aelius wrote: »Who even said they were pay to win? I've read about (and said) a fair amount of criticism about their implementation, but that's a new one to me. They're a Game-changer for sure, in a big way, but you can get by without them and still be competitive, it just takes more work. Therefore, not pay to win.
The legitimate complaint is that it's not fair to non-subscribers, and as much as subscribing needed a boost to make it worthwhile, this was way too much and is something that absolutely shouldn't be exclusive, but rather offered for sale in the Crown Store as well. I'm all for making ESO+ worth the money, but you can't just give Subscribers any random perk and say it's fair just because they don't get enough. In this case it's absolutely not fair in the slightest, crafting bags may not be necessary to play but they will fundamentally alter the way people who have them play significantly for the better and anyone willing to pay (with either payment model) deserves to have them, and they should find a way to give ESO+ members a bonus that doesn't screw over anyone who pays for DLC's outright.
I don't care about your plight to get crafting bags. You have your own threads to discuss that. This thread is not about that. Go away.
Wow, so I agree with you that they're not pay to win, but I add one paragraph about the other stuff and you respond by being a total ***? Some people.
hydrocynus wrote: »Lucius_Aelius wrote: »hydrocynus wrote: »Lucius_Aelius wrote: »Who even said they were pay to win? I've read about (and said) a fair amount of criticism about their implementation, but that's a new one to me. They're a Game-changer for sure, in a big way, but you can get by without them and still be competitive, it just takes more work. Therefore, not pay to win.
The legitimate complaint is that it's not fair to non-subscribers, and as much as subscribing needed a boost to make it worthwhile, this was way too much and is something that absolutely shouldn't be exclusive, but rather offered for sale in the Crown Store as well. I'm all for making ESO+ worth the money, but you can't just give Subscribers any random perk and say it's fair just because they don't get enough. In this case it's absolutely not fair in the slightest, crafting bags may not be necessary to play but they will fundamentally alter the way people who have them play significantly for the better and anyone willing to pay (with either payment model) deserves to have them, and they should find a way to give ESO+ members a bonus that doesn't screw over anyone who pays for DLC's outright.
I don't care about your plight to get crafting bags. You have your own threads to discuss that. This thread is not about that. Go away.
Wow, so I agree with you that they're not pay to win, but I add one paragraph about the other stuff and you respond by being a total ***? Some people.
Because otherwise that penguin chick is gonna start shouting at me again for starting a new thread about the same thing.
No hard feelings dude. I am getting it from all sides.
hydrocynus wrote: »That this whole thing is ironic sweetie pie.
But you are right. We do disagree to an extent.
The fact that there is no valid answer to support why people are calling creating bags P2W supports my request for people to get over it.
Perhaps I should define "it" because I think that is where you are getting confused. "It" refers to people calling crafting bags P2W.
If there is no reason then they most get over it? How does your logic find that contradictory?
Further to answer your question wrt the intention of a new thread, I have no interest whatsoever in discussing who should get crafting bags and who wouldn't because as many have said that discussion is raging elsewhere. All I am interested in is those that claim it to be P2W should explain why they say that and the majority of answers to this thread are ones of agreement that it is not so those arguing it is in the other threads should stop and get over it
Actually I have to concede to you completely. We disagree on the whole thing. Carry on to argue please.
EstelioVeleth wrote: »Soon there will be no other conversations on this forum except for the bag. People complain about the bag, and other people feel the need to complain about those that complain about the bag, and here I am complaining of those that complain about those that complain about the bag!!! :'(
You have obviously seen one or more people commenting on it being P2W in other threads so my point is that you should have replied to them if you wanted answers because as far as I've seen (and also demonstrated by this post) those views are extremely limited in numbers.hydrocynus wrote: »That this whole thing is ironic sweetie pie.
But you are right. We do disagree to an extent.
The fact that there is no valid answer to support why people are calling creating bags P2W supports my request for people to get over it.
Perhaps I should define "it" because I think that is where you are getting confused. "It" refers to people calling crafting bags P2W.
If there is no reason then they most get over it? How does your logic find that contradictory?
Further to answer your question wrt the intention of a new thread, I have no interest whatsoever in discussing who should get crafting bags and who wouldn't because as many have said that discussion is raging elsewhere. All I am interested in is those that claim it to be P2W should explain why they say that and the majority of answers to this thread are ones of agreement that it is not so those arguing it is in the other threads should stop and get over it
Actually I have to concede to you completely. We disagree on the whole thing. Carry on to argue please.
Sunburnt_Penguin wrote: »if I'm in a thread about "Is it weird that the Earth has lots of water?" and out of 100+ replies I see one person that says: "the Earth is flat nub". I'm not going to create a new thread saying "How is the Earth flat?" hoping that the person sees it and knowing full well that it's not flat and there's no logical discussion to be had.