LegendaryMage wrote: »
Are you denying that your playstyle is very defensive? Just writing your name somewhere is a personnal attack now?
LegendaryMage wrote: »LegendaryMage wrote: »
Are you denying that your playstyle is very defensive? Just writing your name somewhere is a personnal attack now?
How is 46.5k magicka and 2.5/6k spell dmg defensive? You know how many sorcs out there have way higher regens than my barely 1.6k unbuffed?
LegendaryMage wrote: »LegendaryMage wrote: »
Are you denying that your playstyle is very defensive? Just writing your name somewhere is a personnal attack now?
How is 46.5k magicka and 2.5/6k spell dmg defensive? You know how many sorcs out there have way higher regens than my barely 1.6k unbuffed?
Considering your shield scales on your max mana, that you have a personnal tree call eda storm atro to los around, and that you usually play amidst your mines and use a lot of heavy resto attacks.... yes you have a defensive playstyle. Playstyle != setup
LegendaryMage wrote: »timidobserver wrote: »Eh, various builds/classes have great synergy with certain sets. If we are going to target Templar and DK, we might as well target everybody. We can take all of the sets that add damage like spell power cure, alchemist, molag kena, ect and make them major sorcery? We can take engine guardian and all of the various sustain sets and make them grant major buffs for stamina/magicka recovery.
I would say that boosting healing taken through the roof is not a great synergy, it's totally OP and promotes endless fights. Getting rid of these cheesy tactics one by one is what will make the game better in the long run and promote higher quality fights, be it 20vs20 or 5vs5 or 1vs1 etc.
Have you ever fought someone that takes little damage, does insane damage and has crazy healing capabilities (one vigor + rally and boom full hp just like that)? That kind of stuff shouldn't be possible, regardless of your class or build setup. Some of those great synergies are really killing balance and with the addition of new sets and more creative players, we will be seeing more of it rather than less.
Lava_Croft wrote: »Some people bloom later than others, no big deal.Lava_Croft wrote: »Dueling is not zerging and ZOS wants you to zerg. Stop breaking the game.
ZOS got me so disillusioned i find myself agreeing with almost every comment kris makes on pvp. What have i become.That's the EU dueling scene for you. I want to pinch their cheeks and make them fresh lemonade.Yes I'm probably very boring to fight, so i don't impose my boring playstyle to the duelling sceneLegendaryMage wrote: »Good for you, what do you want now, a cookie?
Please add something more constructive to the thread than personal jabs, we can settle that stuff in Cyrodiil if you want.
It's so cute that you two hate each other.
can you blame @LegendaryMage for playing defensive and sustained? it works for duels everything else is if anything a game play issue. i dueled his templar with mine as usual i run a high damage setup but he outlasted me. i changed my setup to sustain and we had a draw after that i tried my crazy damage setup and caught him once while he got me 3 times that just shows that he is the better dueler and knows which build to use and how to use them. his builds are not more or less annoying than stam dks with perma disorient and slow. the whole discussion is a joke we should be much more objective and on topic those personal attacks are silly and fluffy beeing one of the best players the game has ever seen sure needs nobody defending him or belittle mage
can you blame @LegendaryMage for playing defensive and sustained? it works for duels everything else is if anything a game play issue. i dueled his templar with mine as usual i run a high damage setup but he outlasted me. i changed my setup to sustain and we had a draw after that i tried my crazy damage setup and caught him once while he got me 3 times that just shows that he is the better dueler and knows which build to use and how to use them. his builds are not more or less annoying than stam dks with perma disorient and slow. the whole discussion is a joke we should be much more objective and on topic those personal attacks are silly and fluffy beeing one of the best players the game has ever seen sure needs nobody defending him or belittle mage
Helllooooooo I apologized already, because what I meant is that duels are boring, it's not a personnal jab at mage, his builds are strong and he uses whatever the heck he wants, I don't care, I just explained why I don't like fighting against it..
If people get offended by the word boring that's a whole other issue...
As for being back on topic... is there even a topic? The video is just an endless duel that Fluff decided to put an end to because
1. It was endless
2. He was in an open field build
This video doesn't show that one class is the strongest setup, it shows that duelling between high tier players can be endless on any class.
Helllooooooo I apologized already, because what I meant is that duels are boring, .....
As for being back on topic... is there even a topic? The video is just an endless duel that Fluff decided to put an end to because
1. It was endless
2. He was in an open field build
.
can you blame @LegendaryMage for playing defensive and sustained? it works for duels everything else is if anything a game play issue. i dueled his templar with mine as usual i run a high damage setup but he outlasted me. i changed my setup to sustain and we had a draw after that i tried my crazy damage setup and caught him once while he got me 3 times that just shows that he is the better dueler and knows which build to use and how to use them. his builds are not more or less annoying than stam dks with perma disorient and slow. the whole discussion is a joke we should be much more objective and on topic those personal attacks are silly and fluffy beeing one of the best players the game has ever seen sure needs nobody defending him or belittle mage
Helllooooooo I apologized already, because what I meant is that duels are boring, it's not a personnal jab at mage, his builds are strong and he uses whatever the heck he wants, I don't care, I just explained why I don't like fighting against it..
If people get offended by the word boring that's a whole other issue...
As for being back on topic... is there even a topic? The video is just an endless duel that Fluff decided to put an end to because
1. It was endless
2. He was in an open field build
This video doesn't show that one class is the strongest setup, it shows that duelling between high tier players can be endless on any class.
Tell me in which duelling build would you slot rapid? Of course there are open field builds and duel builds, if you use the same for both, good for you but you can't deny their existence.LegendaryMage wrote: »can you blame @LegendaryMage for playing defensive and sustained? it works for duels everything else is if anything a game play issue. i dueled his templar with mine as usual i run a high damage setup but he outlasted me. i changed my setup to sustain and we had a draw after that i tried my crazy damage setup and caught him once while he got me 3 times that just shows that he is the better dueler and knows which build to use and how to use them. his builds are not more or less annoying than stam dks with perma disorient and slow. the whole discussion is a joke we should be much more objective and on topic those personal attacks are silly and fluffy beeing one of the best players the game has ever seen sure needs nobody defending him or belittle mage
Helllooooooo I apologized already, because what I meant is that duels are boring, it's not a personnal jab at mage, his builds are strong and he uses whatever the heck he wants, I don't care, I just explained why I don't like fighting against it..
If people get offended by the word boring that's a whole other issue...
As for being back on topic... is there even a topic? The video is just an endless duel that Fluff decided to put an end to because
1. It was endless
2. He was in an open field build
This video doesn't show that one class is the strongest setup, it shows that duelling between high tier players can be endless on any class.
There's no such thing as an open field and closed field and dueling field build.
The only thing that I didn't understand so far is why fluffy is referring to me as dad. But I'm happy to give him up for adoption to mumyo if he wants him.
Tell me in which duelling build would you slot rapid? Of course there are open field builds and duel builds, if you use the same for both, good for you but you can't deny their existence.LegendaryMage wrote: »can you blame @LegendaryMage for playing defensive and sustained? it works for duels everything else is if anything a game play issue. i dueled his templar with mine as usual i run a high damage setup but he outlasted me. i changed my setup to sustain and we had a draw after that i tried my crazy damage setup and caught him once while he got me 3 times that just shows that he is the better dueler and knows which build to use and how to use them. his builds are not more or less annoying than stam dks with perma disorient and slow. the whole discussion is a joke we should be much more objective and on topic those personal attacks are silly and fluffy beeing one of the best players the game has ever seen sure needs nobody defending him or belittle mage
Helllooooooo I apologized already, because what I meant is that duels are boring, it's not a personnal jab at mage, his builds are strong and he uses whatever the heck he wants, I don't care, I just explained why I don't like fighting against it..
If people get offended by the word boring that's a whole other issue...
As for being back on topic... is there even a topic? The video is just an endless duel that Fluff decided to put an end to because
1. It was endless
2. He was in an open field build
This video doesn't show that one class is the strongest setup, it shows that duelling between high tier players can be endless on any class.
There's no such thing as an open field and closed field and dueling field build.
The only thing that I didn't understand so far is why fluffy is referring to me as dad. But I'm happy to give him up for adoption to mumyo if he wants him.
I guess the dad joke flew way over your head
LegendaryMage wrote: »
You're not looking to start drama but you're always up for arguing, even when you're dead wrong about something.
Did I say it was wrong to stick to one build? No. But just because you can't see the distinction between the two doesn't mean that I'm wrong.LegendaryMage wrote: »
Well, let's just agree to disagree then. For me there's no distinction between dueling and non-dueling build. When I'm in a battle in Cyrodiil, I have 5+1 abilities on both bars and that's it for me. Whether I go to meet up with players at duel spots or I run between keeps, that's it man. What's wrong with that?
LegendaryMage wrote: »Everything else is not realistic. Now, you can call it 1vX build, healing build, tanking build and everything in between, but it's a build and you can't change your build when you're in combat. You can change it when you're out of combat and swap things all you want, but it's still your build no matter how you name it.
He's partially right, I would add that duels themselves are synthetic fights alltogether. Random encounters in Cyrodiil don't start with zero ultimate, don't start when each person agrees to it, don't abide by any rules of banned sets/skills/potions or whatever. Everything about duelling is synthetic. Switching gear/skills between each duel according to your opponent is taking it to the next level, and I understand how that can be annoying to fight, but hey : you're duelling a player, not a build.LegendaryMage wrote: »As jovre said, the players that change builds just for duels are creating synthetic fights. And I agree, that's why some other people don't like to duel them. Because they run total complete counter builds and it's not fun to participate in such fights. We already have enough imbalances in the game, artificially creating more by yourself is not helping anyone.
And why did he run away? Because it wasn't a duelLegendaryMage wrote: »It's good that fluff had rapids. Without them my charge would fire off every now and then without issues and he wouldn't be able to run away.
LegendaryMage wrote: »
You're not looking to start drama but you're always up for arguing, even when you're dead wrong about something.
Jesus Christ...
First of all, wanting to argue does not equal wanting to start drama. What's the point in conversation, debate and discussion if you have to agree 100% of the time?Did I say it was wrong to stick to one build? No. But just because you can't see the distinction between the two doesn't mean that I'm wrong.LegendaryMage wrote: »
Well, let's just agree to disagree then. For me there's no distinction between dueling and non-dueling build. When I'm in a battle in Cyrodiil, I have 5+1 abilities on both bars and that's it for me. Whether I go to meet up with players at duel spots or I run between keeps, that's it man. What's wrong with that?LegendaryMage wrote: »Everything else is not realistic. Now, you can call it 1vX build, healing build, tanking build and everything in between, but it's a build and you can't change your build when you're in combat. You can change it when you're out of combat and swap things all you want, but it's still your build no matter how you name it.
I completely missed the logic of that argument. Changing skills out of combat means you are changing your build. How is that not true? There is a difference between an open field build and a duelling build for most people, and there are obvious examples as to why :
-A duel is a fixed fight, which means you're not supposed to run away, it's win or lose (or draw) but you're never going to need to escape, heal/support a friend, deal with multiple opponents.
-An open field build is geared to be polyvalent as Cyrodiil encounters are random, and you will face many different combat situations. A duel is always a 1v1, it's something you can count on, so something you can build on.
Why would you waste skill slots? ie why would you keep harness magicka against a stam blade? You're only gimping yourself.
It's the whole point of duelling, it's scripted so that you know what you are facing, contrary to open world.He's partially right, I would add that duels themselves are synthetic fights alltogether. Random encounters in Cyrodiil don't start with zero ultimate, don't start when each person agrees to it, don't abide by any rules of banned sets/skills/potions or whatever. Everything about duelling is synthetic. Switching gear/skills between each duel according to your opponent is taking it to the next level, and I understand how that can be annoying to fight, but hey : you're duelling a player, not a build.LegendaryMage wrote: »As jovre said, the players that change builds just for duels are creating synthetic fights. And I agree, that's why some other people don't like to duel them. Because they run total complete counter builds and it's not fun to participate in such fights. We already have enough imbalances in the game, artificially creating more by yourself is not helping anyone.And why did he run away? Because it wasn't a duelLegendaryMage wrote: »It's good that fluff had rapids. Without them my charge would fire off every now and then without issues and he wouldn't be able to run away.