Doncellius wrote: »Doncellius wrote: »Refuse2GrowUp wrote: »Doncellius wrote: »Refuse2GrowUp wrote: »Lol, I just saw this in someone else's reply...
"The results of this poll will determine just how out of touch/elitist "sub vs non-sub" these forums are compared to the actual in-game playerbase. Judging from the vMA completion poll, my guess is the first option will be the most popular. We shall see"
Guess it was part of the OP and you edited it out @Doncellius. So, having a grown-up understanding of business and a real world expectation that a company must earn profits makes gamers elitist? Can't help but sit in awe at the forums and the ignorance and entitlement of some posters.
But, just for arguments sake, lets say players agree with you that crafting bags should be put up for sale in the crown store, and ZOS lists them for 5k tel var stones, or more. I can only imagine you would then whine they are too expensive and call ZOS greedy and call out anyone who pays for it as an elitist pay-to-win expletive.
Edited what out? I usually only edit for spelling mistakes since it is more difficult to see typos when typing from an iPhone.
Sorry to ruin your entire point, but you should go to the first page. It's one of the first comments
EDIT: You're awefully eager to shoot me down for some reason. Smh. You named yourself after advice you need to take for yourself. You could have easily answered the unbiased poll and stated your opinion. Instead, you attack me as much as you can, without even reading through previous comments.
Fair enough, I see it is a reply in a lower post. Forgive me for not reading thru all of your BS. It is an ignorant post. Guess I am programmed to overlook non-sense.
As for your claim that your poll is unbiased... If it were unbiased, you would not have the caveat in the first couple options that "I am an ESO+ Member". This implies that only a subscriber would agree with this. In reality, I am sure most mature adults agree with it, even if not subscribers; if not agree with it or like it, then certainly understand it. ZOS is a company and they must make money. There is nothing wrong with offering subs a quality perk, and in MMOs it is hard to offer perks that do not fringe upon P2W; crafting bags are a reasonable offer to subs.
Look, I agree that inventory management in this game is a nightmare. The tendency for ZOS to make sets BoP in recent DLCs has certainly compounded the problem since we are now forced to horde as we never know when sets will get buffed or nerfed and, because the RNG rates in this game are atrocious, we cannot be assured we can replace said sets in a reasonable time-frame. The devs really need to do something about the BoP system and inventory management as a whole. As is, most players are forced to create mules, but those of use that actively play all our characters cannot rely on mules. I am forced to create a guild just to use as a personal bank for an extra 500 slots. Who knows, maybe keeping inventory space small and the prevalence of mules is part of their stragety to sell new character slots. I agree that inventory management needs to be addressed, and even that it would be nice for crafting bags to be available to all.
However, your polled is biased, and as such, I completely disregarded any relevance it may have. There are more tactful ways to discuss issues. Furthermore, you claims that anyone who sides one way is an elitist that is out of touch with the gaming community is absurd and completely skews you as someone incapable of a rational thought or grown-up discussion.
Your jumbling everything together. Relax a bit! Lol.
When you see ESO+ member or not an ESO+ member for two separate options, it means the same thing.
It serves solely to distinguish those who are Subbed to those who aren't. I did this because I took an educated guess that most Subs were going to say yes. The second option allows Non-Subs to be recognized as well for picking Yes. Because of this, you can tell how many Subs compared to non-Subs chose Yes, an interesting thing to look at.
This all doesn't matter. poll answers should have been:
1. Yes
2. No
3. i don't mind
Maybe it's interesting whether the guys are subbed or not, but i can choose everything i want. Even if it#s the false option. So it's just a useless and maybe even false information.
People feel strongly on this topic. You won't get many of the trolls picking random answers. When I created this thread, it served as a poll version of the discussion on this topic (other thread). The toxicity coming from this thread makes me ashamed to have joined these forums, which are unbelievably detatched from the actual in-game opinions right now.
Wish I could lock this thread and pretend I hadn't heard about Crafting Bags yet.
Doncellius wrote: »
People feel strongly on this topic. You won't get many of the trolls picking random answers. When I created this thread, it served as a poll version of the discussion on this topic (other thread). The toxicity coming from this thread makes me ashamed to have joined these forums, which are unbelievably detatched from the actual in-game opinions right now.
Wish I could lock this thread and pretend I hadn't heard about Crafting Bags yet.
This bit is very interesting as it is an opinion not a fact (which it seems to are attempting to project it as) as my perception and interaction is very different from yours - as stated previously many of my friends and guild members welcome this and think it is a good idea to prolong the financing of the game.
Yep. Everyone I have talked to in game about this topic thinks it is a great idea to add incentive to the sub, too. Which is a steady stream of incoming income for ZOS and the game.
But so is income from people buying those DLCs - it is not as if they would not contribute.
Doncellius wrote: »
People feel strongly on this topic. You won't get many of the trolls picking random answers. When I created this thread, it served as a poll version of the discussion on this topic (other thread). The toxicity coming from this thread makes me ashamed to have joined these forums, which are unbelievably detatched from the actual in-game opinions right now.
Wish I could lock this thread and pretend I hadn't heard about Crafting Bags yet.
This bit is very interesting as it is an opinion not a fact (which it seems to are attempting to project it as) as my perception and interaction is very different from yours - as stated previously many of my friends and guild members welcome this and think it is a good idea to prolong the financing of the game.
Yep. Everyone I have talked to in game about this topic thinks it is a great idea to add incentive to the sub, too. Which is a steady stream of incoming income for ZOS and the game.
But so is income from people buying those DLCs - it is not as if they would not contribute.
No, of course not. They are absolutely contributing to the upkeep of the game too.
But a sub to Zenimax is $15 of predictable and projectable income that they can use to see how the game is doing financially. They can't predict how much a person is going to spend in the Crown Store.
Doncellius wrote: »
People feel strongly on this topic. You won't get many of the trolls picking random answers. When I created this thread, it served as a poll version of the discussion on this topic (other thread). The toxicity coming from this thread makes me ashamed to have joined these forums, which are unbelievably detatched from the actual in-game opinions right now.
Wish I could lock this thread and pretend I hadn't heard about Crafting Bags yet.
This bit is very interesting as it is an opinion not a fact (which it seems to are attempting to project it as) as my perception and interaction is very different from yours - as stated previously many of my friends and guild members welcome this and think it is a good idea to prolong the financing of the game.
Yep. Everyone I have talked to in game about this topic thinks it is a great idea to add incentive to the sub, too. Which is a steady stream of incoming income for ZOS and the game.
But so is income from people buying those DLCs - it is not as if they would not contribute.
Doncellius wrote: »
People feel strongly on this topic. You won't get many of the trolls picking random answers. When I created this thread, it served as a poll version of the discussion on this topic (other thread). The toxicity coming from this thread makes me ashamed to have joined these forums, which are unbelievably detatched from the actual in-game opinions right now.
Wish I could lock this thread and pretend I hadn't heard about Crafting Bags yet.
This bit is very interesting as it is an opinion not a fact (which it seems to are attempting to project it as) as my perception and interaction is very different from yours - as stated previously many of my friends and guild members welcome this and think it is a good idea to prolong the financing of the game.
Yep. Everyone I have talked to in game about this topic thinks it is a great idea to add incentive to the sub, too. Which is a steady stream of incoming income for ZOS and the game.
But so is income from people buying those DLCs - it is not as if they would not contribute.
So I sub and use my crowns to buy the DLC's' how is this different?
Doncellius wrote: »
People feel strongly on this topic. You won't get many of the trolls picking random answers. When I created this thread, it served as a poll version of the discussion on this topic (other thread). The toxicity coming from this thread makes me ashamed to have joined these forums, which are unbelievably detatched from the actual in-game opinions right now.
Wish I could lock this thread and pretend I hadn't heard about Crafting Bags yet.
This bit is very interesting as it is an opinion not a fact (which it seems to are attempting to project it as) as my perception and interaction is very different from yours - as stated previously many of my friends and guild members welcome this and think it is a good idea to prolong the financing of the game.
Yep. Everyone I have talked to in game about this topic thinks it is a great idea to add incentive to the sub, too. Which is a steady stream of incoming income for ZOS and the game.
But so is income from people buying those DLCs - it is not as if they would not contribute.
No, of course not. They are absolutely contributing to the upkeep of the game too.
But a sub to Zenimax is $15 of predictable and projectable income that they can use to see how the game is doing financially. They can't predict how much a person is going to spend in the Crown Store.
Well, if they could not do that, they would be a quite bad business. They have the numbers and they can say, what amount of people will probably buy a certain DLC - or at least they should be able to. Businesses are not run blindly, but they use data of all kind, to predict their future profits.
If I stop subbing I still have themA bit naughty to call me silly we all have the option of do things as we see fit
If I stop subbing I still have themA bit naughty to call me silly we all have the option of do things as we see fit
Like paying double?- Why would you want to unsubscribe while you are playing the game - the subscription becomes more and more valuable over time due to more DLCs, which you do not have to buy to use them. So you cheat yourself with subscribing and buying the DLCs - you will most likely never unsubscribe, as long as you play - there will always be the next DLC, which you want to play as well. And if you stop playing, you will not make use of your bought DLCs - this is not different from when you would not have bought them and subbed. When you stop playing you loose the game content - that you own it is irrelevant, because you are no longer playing then.
If I stop subbing I still have themA bit naughty to call me silly we all have the option of do things as we see fit
Like paying double?- Why would you want to unsubscribe while you are playing the game - the subscription becomes more and more valuable over time due to more DLCs, which you do not have to buy to use them. So you cheat yourself with subscribing and buying the DLCs - you will most likely never unsubscribe, as long as you play - there will always be the next DLC, which you want to play as well. And if you stop playing, you will not make use of your bought DLCs - this is not different from when you would not have bought them and subbed. When you stop playing you loose the game content - that you own it is irrelevant, because you are no longer playing then.
Ok another I will agree to disagree with
Personofsecrets wrote: »I save a lot of money by purchasing the DLC with crowns. That way I can unsubscribe when I want, for example right now I am not subscribed as I am not happy with some current state of affairs, but I can still join my friends in places like the Imperial City Prison or Maw of Lork'haj without having to resub. Otherwise, what exactly of top importance am I spending my crowns on?
Copied this verbatim from another thread because I hate typing.
The prices are completely relative. That's for ZOS to decide.
The sub vs non-sub problem you present is a non issue since the bags are completely separate and independent of one another.
The prices are more realistic than what was posted in the post I replied to.
As for the bags being separate and independent then same thing, higher cost because it requires additional development to add the second type of bag.
Wanderinlost wrote: »Doncellius wrote: »The results of this poll will determine just how out of touch/elitist "sub vs non-sub" these forums are compared to the actual in-game playerbase. Judging from the vMA completion poll, my guess is the first option will be the most popular. We shall see
It is definitely not limited to this game but the MMO sphere in general. Subs have catastrophically failed to support MMO's across the industry with only a handful of exceptions(perhaps less). Yet it is the subs who never fail to accuse, belittle and degrade a large portion of a game's playerbase as if they somehow contribute less. We usually pay a premium for flexibility, and that is why we have chosen to support and spend on games like ESO, but apparently that is not enough. Apparently many feel that their value as an ESO+ subscriber would be less if the rest of us could buy this great feature. They would still get the feature included in their monthly sub along with all the other benefits but they would not feel as special if others could buy access. I have spent the last 10 hours trying to determine a better reason although at this point I'm ready to chalk it up to elitist ***. I might be over-generalizing, but I think that it may be the #1 reason to what is driving such resistance against this feature going in the crown store.
Doncellius wrote: »
People feel strongly on this topic. You won't get many of the trolls picking random answers. When I created this thread, it served as a poll version of the discussion on this topic (other thread). The toxicity coming from this thread makes me ashamed to have joined these forums, which are unbelievably detatched from the actual in-game opinions right now.
Wish I could lock this thread and pretend I hadn't heard about Crafting Bags yet.
This bit is very interesting as it is an opinion not a fact (which it seems to are attempting to project it as) as my perception and interaction is very different from yours - as stated previously many of my friends and guild members welcome this and think it is a good idea to prolong the financing of the game.
Yep. Everyone I have talked to in game about this topic thinks it is a great idea to add incentive to the sub, too. Which is a steady stream of incoming income for ZOS and the game.
But so is income from people buying those DLCs - it is not as if they would not contribute.
No, of course not. They are absolutely contributing to the upkeep of the game too.
But a sub to Zenimax is $15 of predictable and projectable income that they can use to see how the game is doing financially. They can't predict how much a person is going to spend in the Crown Store.
ESO+ has little use already, some more use is in order to justify paying a monthly fee.
Darkstorne wrote: »Doncellius wrote: »
People feel strongly on this topic. You won't get many of the trolls picking random answers. When I created this thread, it served as a poll version of the discussion on this topic (other thread). The toxicity coming from this thread makes me ashamed to have joined these forums, which are unbelievably detatched from the actual in-game opinions right now.
Wish I could lock this thread and pretend I hadn't heard about Crafting Bags yet.
This bit is very interesting as it is an opinion not a fact (which it seems to are attempting to project it as) as my perception and interaction is very different from yours - as stated previously many of my friends and guild members welcome this and think it is a good idea to prolong the financing of the game.
Yep. Everyone I have talked to in game about this topic thinks it is a great idea to add incentive to the sub, too. Which is a steady stream of incoming income for ZOS and the game.
But so is income from people buying those DLCs - it is not as if they would not contribute.
No, of course not. They are absolutely contributing to the upkeep of the game too.
But a sub to Zenimax is $15 of predictable and projectable income that they can use to see how the game is doing financially. They can't predict how much a person is going to spend in the Crown Store.
It's really not. There's no 12 month commitment like subscriptions to other services require. Players can cancel whenever they like. I go back and forth between ESO, SWTOR, and FFXIV, regularly cancelling and resubbing to each throughout the year, never subbing to more than one game at a time. Subscription income is no more predictable and projectable than Crown Store additions.