wut

Millerman34n wrote: »

This is one of my biggest Gripes about eso atm it pisses me off either make it a 5 piece bonus to heavy or remove it! Shouldn't Majica classes be able to use a sword and shield too?

spenc_cathb16_ESO wrote: »

wut

DannyLV702 wrote: »

i am so confused lol

He wants the nerf to blocking to either be removed when wearing 5 pieces of heavy armor as a bonus or to be removed altogether.

The last thing we need is perma blocking back.

You shouldn't drop the block nerf without dropping the rest of the nerfs (dodge, damage, shields healiing etc).

Of all the nerfs, block still works the best (or almost the best, depending on the scenario) currently even without heavy armor.

Millerman34n wrote: »

Xeven wrote: »

The last thing we need is perma blocking back.

It's still here lol

Only if you're a gimp.

Xeven wrote: »

Millerman34n wrote: »

Xeven wrote: »

The last thing we need is perma blocking back.

It's still here lol

Only if you're a gimp.

But seeing as it never went away in the first place, there is no 'coming back.'

Forestd16b14_ESO wrote: »

Here's what he is saying.

" Should ZOS add a passive to heavy armor when wearing 5 or more pieces to allow stamina regen. "

And the answer is yes this has been discussed alot already.

Except this is what his poll says.

This needs your vote!!!
Keep block nerf!
Remove block nerf!

Potentially buffing heavy armor with a passive that reduces the nerf or removes it, might sound all fine and dandy. But very different from removing the nerf in general.

This didn't really need my vote, I'm more or less indifferent to this nerf.

I will say I tank just fine with it in place, and if you should be my tank when I'm a healer, well I got you covered with spear shards.

I didn't see the roll server back to patch 1.5 option, someone help please.

Death to the perma blockers!!

Never had a problem with permablocking. And with the increased block cost in 1.6, really no one should.

The whole "QQ permablock" argument for nerfing block was always a L2P issue. Someone trying to permablock paid for it by outputting less dps (no LA weaving) and needing to build for it. You just coordinated w/ a timed Fear and dropped them with burst.

And honestly, the regen nerf was the nail in the coffin that finally exposed Heavy Armor for the trash it is in PvP.

It's funny reading post about how people hate perma-blockers. Sorry, is it 5+ heavy armor piece users that were the irritating ones that were still able to output damage that frustrated you, or was it a build designed around staying alive that made you irritated your standard burst rotation didn't always net you a kill? If the first then this change wouldn't change anything, and if the second then sorry but right now blocking is the most reliable way to counter the current insane damage meta and heavy armor is severely lacking here.

I really like the idea of having stam regen while blocking with 5 pc heavy bonus. I would prefer these fatigues to disappear altogether however. What are they trying to accomplish with these combat nerfs?

Complaints about perma-blocking are equivalent to complaints about animation canceling. That's what you've signed up for, brah. Don't hate the players, hate the game. USE WHAT YOU'RE GIVEN. It's as if the game devs just didn't see it possible that players could harness the full potential of there game OR the even more likely event that they weren't even aware of what that was. They won't stop general combat nerfs until combat is so simplified that the entire dev team can FINALLY kill a well-manned group of 4.

This game started out giving players flexibility and because some players understood the game too well it created a large skill gap where players couldn't compete with "the big dawgs." These big dawgs, playing to their advantages, single-handedly brought these nerfs to the game. I just find that hilarious...

They had spoke so highly of giving players the opportunity to make heroic efforts, but with every one of these nerfs.. the "big dawgs" are actually the only ones being targeted here. Do you know how much ANY/ALL of these nerfs effects a player who can't play in Cyrodiil without a group of 12+ ... IT DOESN'T. AT ALL. Nobody is saying give the little man buffs. Simply asking: stop with the nerfs to the little man/buffs to larger groups. Oh YAY, we get more AP now? xD

Do any of these issues TRULY fruition from PvE? Hell no. Wrobel claims AoE caps is a more delicate issue than, "hitting more players in Cyrodiil." As Edward Snowden says, "That's horseshit" I doubt they have any specific fight in mind or could point one out that would require some serious rework because of AoE caps. Blocking? Dodge roll? Streak? All the same case.
They need to wake up and see they're hurting the longevity of their game (PvP) by catering to an impermanent and exchangeable group or the memory of Chalamo will be lost forever.