SG_Celerrimus wrote: »Out of curiosity, has ZOS ever given a reason as to why they don't ever allow people to make group damage tracking addons? It just feels off that these things are still not allowed for some reason.
Technically they are allowed (FTC has a similar function) but only if people have the ability to keep their numbers private (opt out).
Elijah_Crow wrote: »
What's your point?because the carebears cried..
This is like the only mmo without triaining dummies or group dps tracking abilities..
Best part is, New raid with thieves guild.. Guilds that are aiming to be on the leaderboard WILL without question have DPS requirements.
Then might I suggest asking for improvements on it then?Elijah_Crow wrote: »
But after the fact and with no situational context.
The main reason it was removed was because of its "spying" function where no one could say no to being inspected. If an add on existed (like FTC) that had the ability to opt out existed, then no one would bat an eye.
Then might I suggest asking for improvements on it then?Elijah_Crow wrote: »
But after the fact and with no situational context.
That or someone can make another add on to do what FTC does, but better. Or have GroupDamage edited to have an opt out function (which it apparently can't? I've been told it has technical limitations)
The main reason it was removed was because of its "spying" function where no one could say no to being inspected. If an add on existed (like FTC) that had the ability to opt out existed, then no one would bat an eye.
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »
I've never understood why ppl need this. Other than wanting to boot someone or say I'm better than or worse than X player
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »
I've never understood why ppl need this. Other than wanting to boot someone or say I'm better than or worse than X player
Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »NewBlacksmurf wrote: »
I've never understood why ppl need this. Other than wanting to boot someone or say I'm better than or worse than X player
I think you are describing a very small aspect of this type of addon. I am in a few different PVE guilds, some more competitive than others.
From the competitive guild standpoint, we need a way to know who is doing what so we can better optimize raid groups. Not sure if you have been in the new trial, but the first boss has over 40 million health (that's like 7 manticores). Play the way you want is great and all, but you are going to need a baseline level of DPS to even have a shot at this type of content. Having group after group fail because of low DPS is not good for the game.
From a less competitive guild standpoint, Group Damage was the absolute best tool I have ever used to help people get their numbers up. In any guild I chose to be in (I like to think this is the norm) we try to help people improve their builds. Most people pulling really low numbers arent stubborn people that refuse to adapt, they simply need help to improve. If you are being kicked by guildmates for low DPS, you need a new guild.
FTC group damage is terrible. It doesnt work well. They need to make an App like group damage that can be opted in and out of, and perhaps it should be disabled for groupfinder groups, so exclusion is not an issue. If you are using groupfinder, you should not be expecting speed runs.
Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »NewBlacksmurf wrote: »
I've never understood why ppl need this. Other than wanting to boot someone or say I'm better than or worse than X player
I think you are describing a very small aspect of this type of addon. I am in a few different PVE guilds, some more competitive than others.
From the competitive guild standpoint, we need a way to know who is doing what so we can better optimize raid groups. Not sure if you have been in the new trial, but the first boss has over 40 million health (that's like 7 manticores). Play the way you want is great and all, but you are going to need a baseline level of DPS to even have a shot at this type of content. Having group after group fail because of low DPS is not good for the game.
From a less competitive guild standpoint, Group Damage was the absolute best tool I have ever used to help people get their numbers up. In any guild I chose to be in (I like to think this is the norm) we try to help people improve their builds. Most people pulling really low numbers arent stubborn people that refuse to adapt, they simply need help to improve. If you are being kicked by guildmates for low DPS, you need a new guild.
FTC group damage is terrible. It doesnt work well. They need to make an App like group damage that can be opted in and out of, and perhaps it should be disabled for groupfinder groups, so exclusion is not an issue. If you are using groupfinder, you should not be expecting speed runs.
Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »NewBlacksmurf wrote: »
I've never understood why ppl need this. Other than wanting to boot someone or say I'm better than or worse than X player
I think you are describing a very small aspect of this type of addon. I am in a few different PVE guilds, some more competitive than others.
From the competitive guild standpoint, we need a way to know who is doing what so we can better optimize raid groups. Not sure if you have been in the new trial, but the first boss has over 40 million health (that's like 7 manticores). Play the way you want is great and all, but you are going to need a baseline level of DPS to even have a shot at this type of content. Having group after group fail because of low DPS is not good for the game.
From a less competitive guild standpoint, Group Damage was the absolute best tool I have ever used to help people get their numbers up. In any guild I chose to be in (I like to think this is the norm) we try to help people improve their builds. Most people pulling really low numbers arent stubborn people that refuse to adapt, they simply need help to improve. If you are being kicked by guildmates for low DPS, you need a new guild.
FTC group damage is terrible. It doesnt work well. They need to make an App like group damage that can be opted in and out of, and perhaps it should be disabled for groupfinder groups, so exclusion is not an issue. If you are using groupfinder, you should not be expecting speed runs.
Then might I suggest asking for improvements on it then?Elijah_Crow wrote: »
But after the fact and with no situational context.
That or someone can make another add on to do what FTC does, but better. Or have GroupDamage edited to have an opt out function (which it apparently can't? I've been told it has technical limitations)
The main reason it was removed was because of its "spying" function where no one could say no to being inspected. If an add on existed (like FTC) that had the ability to opt out existed, then no one would bat an eye.
Well, yea. And thats what a lot of people who supported it were asking for.
As it is, FTC just shows a number at the end of the fight that disregards things like; the person had to stop dps because of mechanics, the execute phase bootsted the numbers, lacking resources, a bad timer start, etc. all of which GD actively displayed. This is not a problem for people who know the fights and mechanics well, because they will know when things pick up or drop off. But it is potentially very toxic in groups who are less experienced, which is the situation many dislike.NewBlacksmurf wrote: »
I've never understood why ppl need this. Other than wanting to boot someone or say I'm better than or worse than X player
*Group leaders can arange groups so that there is a better chance of suceeding even with lower dps. This has the potential to lessen the chance of failure and people feeling responsible for said failure.
*you can more easily see where you sit in the groups damage pool, and can have better tools to decide whether you want to improve what you are doing, or if you are fine where you are. (More importantly fine with where you are.)
*you can actually see if that elitest prick is puting his money where his mouth is, or if hes just a jerk who wants a group to carry him. (I find the latter to be true frequently, especially when he dies and we complete without him.)
*groups going for faster and smoother runs can more easily pinpoint places where things fall off, and can more easily take steps to improve as a team.
[EDIT] i just want to state these are alternate reasons, not necessarily better or worse, just alternate.
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »Then might I suggest asking for improvements on it then?Elijah_Crow wrote: »
But after the fact and with no situational context.
That or someone can make another add on to do what FTC does, but better. Or have GroupDamage edited to have an opt out function (which it apparently can't? I've been told it has technical limitations)
The main reason it was removed was because of its "spying" function where no one could say no to being inspected. If an add on existed (like FTC) that had the ability to opt out existed, then no one would bat an eye.
Well, yea. And thats what a lot of people who supported it were asking for.
As it is, FTC just shows a number at the end of the fight that disregards things like; the person had to stop dps because of mechanics, the execute phase bootsted the numbers, lacking resources, a bad timer start, etc. all of which GD actively displayed. This is not a problem for people who know the fights and mechanics well, because they will know when things pick up or drop off. But it is potentially very toxic in groups who are less experienced, which is the situation many dislike.NewBlacksmurf wrote: »
I've never understood why ppl need this. Other than wanting to boot someone or say I'm better than or worse than X player
*Group leaders can arange groups so that there is a better chance of suceeding even with lower dps. This has the potential to lessen the chance of failure and people feeling responsible for said failure.
*you can more easily see where you sit in the groups damage pool, and can have better tools to decide whether you want to improve what you are doing, or if you are fine where you are. (More importantly fine with where you are.)
*you can actually see if that elitest prick is puting his money where his mouth is, or if hes just a jerk who wants a group to carry him. (I find the latter to be true frequently, especially when he dies and we complete without him.)
*groups going for faster and smoother runs can more easily pinpoint places where things fall off, and can more easily take steps to improve as a team.
[EDIT] i just want to state these are alternate reasons, not necessarily better or worse, just alternate.
I think you are missing the ZOS design.
Their game success isn't based on DPS or Heal or tanking....just look at the recent changes.
-Scaling all players to the max levels
-opening up cross faction grouping and trials (BETA)
-removing VR levels and going to a CP basis with CP caps
-nerfs this, expand that, change this, adjust that
-group bonus if using grouping tools
-meshing heals and tank to where everyone needs to DPS and no one stands out as tank or healer.
The new Trail, although it will be challenging at first, its largely mechanics and knowing what to do and how to compliment or play well with others. The only "end game" that works off DPS scales or Healing meters is vMSA and now that its adding save progress...well you see where I'm going with this.
While it may not align with what you prefer and you may even disagree with what I'm sharing....this game is not make it or break it based on meters by design.
So....again...Why do ppl need it, other than booting someone or seeing that they are better o worse than another player....WHICH FYI isn't solely based on stats or a rotation. The beauty of this game is...its real time combat so meters typically only work well in games that are call n response like the older traditional MMORPGs that even new MMOs are made today off that design, but not ESO...
Not sure thats good or bad but the real time combat is why I like it.