so not subbing, no loyalty,... i should have just not sub'ed and paid for content that I wanted?
That makes so much sense,.....
Yep. As long as they stay at one DLC per quarter and no DLC ever costs more than 4500 Crowns, subbing gives you enough "free" Crowns to own every DLC, with a few left over for fluff stuff that doesn't include any new content.
thats BS, what we were lead to believe as a sub is that we got all DLC. we didnt have to spend additional funds for DLC
thats BS, what we were lead to believe as a sub is that we got all DLC. we didnt have to spend additional funds for DLC
That would only work I think if you didn't get any Crowns for subbing. As I said above, you get 4500 Crowns per quarter, which is more than enough to buy one DLC per quarter, so you essentially do get ownership of the DLC with your sub, as long as you aren't spending more than 2000 of those free Crowns per quarter on fluff and shortcuts.Irrespective of the fact that OP doesn't understand the obvious thing of how subbing works regarding the access to DLC's, he's right in one matter - and I saw that it was pointed out many times on the forum.
The thing is the access to DLC should be kept after unsubbing if the player was a subscriber for a certain period of time. E.g. if the player is a subscriber for at least 4 months, he should acquire ownership of one DLC, for at least 8 months - two DLCs, etc.
If subscription works this way, I would be a subscriber too.
Irrespective of the fact that OP doesn't understand the obvious thing of how subbing works regarding the access to DLC's, he's right in one matter - and I saw that it was pointed out many times on the forum.
The thing is the access to DLC should be kept after unsubbing if the player was a subscriber for a certain period of time. E.g. if the player is a subscriber for at least 4 months, he should acquire ownership of one DLC, for at least 8 months - two DLCs, etc.
If subscription works this way, I would be a subscriber too.
I don't think a quote that applies to a business model that no longer exists is particularly useful.Perhaps he was confused by that We don't want the player to worry about which parts of the game to pay for - with our system, they get it all thing, because right now it seems as though they wanted players to worry about which parts of the game to pay for, and not giving it all, not even to subscribers. I, for one, find such reversals very confusing!
Perhaps he was confused by that We don't want the player to worry about which parts of the game to pay for - with our system, they get it all thing, because right now it seems as though they wanted players to worry about which parts of the game to pay for, and not giving it all, not even to subscribers. I, for one, find such reversals very confusing!
My point is once you pay for DLC it should always be avilable up to point of paying.........
so not subbing, no loyalty,... i should have just not sub'ed and paid for content that I wanted?
That makes so much sense,.....
Perhaps he was confused by that We don't want the player to worry about which parts of the game to pay for - with our system, they get it all thing, because right now it seems as though they wanted players to worry about which parts of the game to pay for, and not giving it all, not even to subscribers. I, for one, find such reversals very confusing!