XANTITHESISX wrote: »XANTITHESISX wrote: »The problem I have with Surprise Attack is that if I have already hit a NB or the NB has already hit me then guess what?.. Its no longer a surprise.!!!
As a matter of fact, I would say that it would be no surprise to see the recap say... Surprise attack, Mass Hysteria, Surprise Attack, Surprise Attack, Surprise Attack...
I think you get the point...
or Surprise Attack, Wrecking Blow, Surprise Attack, Surprise Attack...
I think I missed the point. Are you saying that spamming SA is a problem?
Jabs, Jabs, Jabs, Jabs.
WB, WB, WB, WB
Whip, Whip, Whip, Whip
Overload, Overload, Overload, Overload.
You can't play anything these days without getting QQ-ed at by someone. Jabs spammer. cloak spammer. WB spammer. Shield spammer. They're always total hypocrites though.
leepalmer95 wrote: »bowmanz607 wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »bowmanz607 wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »imredneckson wrote: »Why not just leave NBs alone and buff Templars and magicka DKs
Because when 'sorc' where OP, they got nerfed, when dk's was they got nerfed, when templar wasn't they got nerfed.
Now because nb's are OP all the nb's who have been calling for nerf's for other classes for a year all of a sudden don't want anymore 'nerf's just buff the other classes.
Where was this buff the other class thought when magicka nb's were top? or sorc?, it wasn't instead all the other classes were nerfed apart from nb's and now it's time for nb's to be adjusted you don't accept it.
Lol. When did sorcs get nerged. Stam got a buff and mag still destroys. Is your "nerf" shield breaker? Outside of that maybe negate. Sorc shields still op. They need to raise the damage shield and make it crit. But I digress.
We ignoring the 50% dmg shield debuff? Or the fact is has a direct counter item set to it's class defence or the fact bolt escape has a 50% increase? Or the fact healing ward got double nerfed with the healing + dmg shield nerf, which is a sorc main heal.
Nb has never received any negative adjustment to their skills.
50% shield debug and damage debug so that equals out.
I will never think of shield breaker as a nerf to sorcs. One it effects all shields for all classes. Two, it is literally the same as any other class getting hit with a light attack. It does the sender damn amount. So your saying because ppl can light attack that is a nerf?
I did forget about streak so on I can concede that. That said, it's overall effect is minimal to a decent player anyway. Decent players never spammed that but used it strategically. Same with dodgeroll good players didn't spam but used strategically.
Healing ward is still crazy good. Heals like a boss and gives solid shiled. Especially for sorcs with champ points in bastion.
Last, you can't use abilities that are available to all to show a particular class got nerfed nor a particular gear set. Healing ward is used by all mag builds besides Temps and even then some temps.
But do other classes run around with shields as their defence? 2k unblockable dmg isn't exactly something you can ignore, ever had someone with a weighted bow LA you for 2k each? Shieldbreaker is dangerous with a good players, a LA-Ransack-Bash player with shieldbreaker auto wins a sorc. Only class so have a set directly counter it's class defence, it's like having a set that doesn't allow nbs to stealth in a 50m range around you.
Bwahahahaha that's actually great. I'd buy thatWould be hilarious xD
XANTITHESISX wrote: »XANTITHESISX wrote: »XANTITHESISX wrote: »The problem I have with Surprise Attack is that if I have already hit a NB or the NB has already hit me then guess what?.. Its no longer a surprise.!!!
As a matter of fact, I would say that it would be no surprise to see the recap say... Surprise attack, Mass Hysteria, Surprise Attack, Surprise Attack, Surprise Attack...
I think you get the point...
or Surprise Attack, Wrecking Blow, Surprise Attack, Surprise Attack...
I think I missed the point. Are you saying that spamming SA is a problem?
Jabs, Jabs, Jabs, Jabs.
WB, WB, WB, WB
Whip, Whip, Whip, Whip
Overload, Overload, Overload, Overload.
Spamming one skill over and over regardless of class reflects lack of skill.. NBs seems to get the brunt because they are everywhere.
So, Auto, you come in here telling us NBs are not OP and you try to justify that by showing off your high K/D as a Nightblade? Yeah, fail. Sorry, bud.
Nothing adds up here and the numbers are not equal. Surprise Attack hits harder than Biting Jabs and is bursty and can be cancelled for even more damage. Major Fracture does not make sense at all and we all know how Nightblades get by far the best passives.
And compare that to the Dragonknight's spam skill which got nerfed over and over again. Or the Sorcerer's... Right, they don't even have one.
Nightblades are OP, period. It's well-known. Cyrodiil isn't overrun with them because they're so prestiguous, Be honest and stop deluding other players. Vampires got nerfed, DKs got nerfed, Sorcs got Shieldbreaker. Because of people (including NBs) qq'ing. Your time has come, and you know that.
So, Auto, you come in here telling us NBs are not OP and you try to justify that by showing off your high K/D as a Nightblade? Yeah, fail. Sorry, bud.
Nothing adds up here and the numbers are not equal. Surprise Attack hits harder than Biting Jabs and is bursty and can be cancelled for even more damage. Major Fracture does not make sense at all and we all know how Nightblades get by far the best passives.
And compare that to the Dragonknight's spam skill which got nerfed over and over again. Or the Sorcerer's... Right, they don't even have one.
Nightblades are OP, period. It's well-known. Cyrodiil isn't overrun with them because they're so prestiguous, Be honest and stop deluding other players. Vampires got nerfed, DKs got nerfed, Sorcs got Shieldbreaker. Because of people (including NBs) qq'ing. Your time has come, and you know that.
This is my experience too. I lead dueling groups twice a week, and I have gone up against some very good players. Sometimes I win, sometimes I lose, but every fight has been fair and honest. Sorcs and DKs have several strong answers to NBs - and this includes SA and cloak.I can say short...NB is the best for this ganging, OP, but for open fights...nb isnt then OP, more OP are dk and sorc in these fight....ok nb also is so good with good player...but more open fights with good players dk and sorcs are more op than nb
go maybe to guild with organizing duels and see then duels with exp players, you will see then...dk rules in duels and sorcs
bowmanz607 wrote: »
leepalmer95 wrote: »bowmanz607 wrote: »
Wb has a 1s charge up and while it can be cancelled with a medium weave most people don't because it does less dmg and 1 button is easy mode.
SA is instant and gives major fracture and when cancelled with a medium weave does comparable or more dmg than wb.
Lets not compare charge skills to instant skills. It's like comparing take flight to wb. Though for some reason the fact a SA does more dmg than jabs is a bit strange considering it's instant and jabs isn't and needs to be aimed.
the amount of sodium chloride in this thread is outrageous lol
leepalmer95 wrote: »
leepalmer95 wrote: »
I dont need to add anything, someone already pointed out comparing SA to an AOE it's a little bit ridiculous and to add to your point, also biased.
I'm here for the fun, bring moar salt plz.
leepalmer95 wrote: »leepalmer95 wrote: »
I dont need to add anything, someone already pointed out comparing SA to an AOE it's a little bit ridiculous and to add to your point, also biased.
I'm here for the fun, bring moar salt plz.
I have 1 of each character. I'm just calling it as i felt it was when i played them all.
Aoe? Have you ever played a templar, people don't use jabs because it's 'aoe'.
Lets compare SA the instant high dmg skill with a stun and armour debuff to other single target abilities shall we?
Ransack - Does 30% less dmg, doesn't have a stun. Have to slot s+b so actually use it.
Whip - Whip = chilli noodle compare to SA.
Oh thats it. Out of all the single target abilities that are actually useful to spam, SA is so far ahead.
Lets compare it to channelled skills?
Jabs - Does less dmg, have to actually aim jabs, stun is on last hit only, only gives weapon crit which is the same buff as camo and crit pot. Oh and you get 2x La + 2x SA in the time it takes someone to 1x La + 1x Jabs, SA have more utility with it's longer stun and armour debuff and does more dmg overall.
Wb - A whole other can of worms, charge up sure, broke range and broken cc, Requires you to slot 2h, only dps skill of some builds. SA is still better hence why nb's don't run around with a 2h and use WB. Some do but there just baddies.
Just weave a light attack and your damage output is higher. Also, in this meta, burst is far superior to channels. And then comes the Major Fracture, raising the dps even more. And stun. Flame Lash got its stun removed, so why are NBs allowed to keep it?So, Auto, you come in here telling us NBs are not OP and you try to justify that by showing off your high K/D as a Nightblade? Yeah, fail. Sorry, bud.
Nothing adds up here and the numbers are not equal. Surprise Attack hits harder than Biting Jabs and is bursty and can be cancelled for even more damage. Major Fracture does not make sense at all and we all know how Nightblades get by far the best passives.
And compare that to the Dragonknight's spam skill which got nerfed over and over again. Or the Sorcerer's... Right, they don't even have one.
Nightblades are OP, period. It's well-known. Cyrodiil isn't overrun with them because they're so prestiguous, Be honest and stop deluding other players. Vampires got nerfed, DKs got nerfed, Sorcs got Shieldbreaker. Because of people (including NBs) qq'ing. Your time has come, and you know that.
First of all, my KDR and KB streaks are not "high," and come from nearly two years of experience, not because I spam SA and cloak. I do not use either of these skills, so your argument that my boasting and "showing off" while using them is mute. The typical "just cloak away and SA" argument doesn't apply to me; These aren't ganks I'm quoting. I will be in your face in a full-on duel until one of us dies. Add to this the fact that I know there are many better players than I am, who get far higher KDRs, and the fact I can tear apart NBs on any of my other characters. This comes from experience and a thorough understanding of the class. My KDR and KB records are similar, if not higher, for my stam sorc and my dk.
The bolded portions above are both inaccurate statements. I ran an analysis of SA versus Jabs, and the data was inconclusive (post #135). I won't believe your claim to it being overpowered until you support it with data, just as I have told many others. If you've seen any of my other posts, then you know I advocate for balance where balance is due.This is my experience too. I lead dueling groups twice a week, and I have gone up against some very good players. Sometimes I win, sometimes I lose, but every fight has been fair and honest. Sorcs and DKs have several strong answers to NBs - and this includes SA and cloak.I can say short...NB is the best for this ganging, OP, but for open fights...nb isnt then OP, more OP are dk and sorc in these fight....ok nb also is so good with good player...but more open fights with good players dk and sorcs are more op than nb
go maybe to guild with organizing duels and see then duels with exp players, you will see then...dk rules in duels and sorcs
The argument that these two things are inherently OP is growing stale. The reason these calls have been made is due to a lack of understanding of the class and its weaknesses, or a lack of will to counter them (like people refusing to use detect pots). It's like saying "hey that DK is using petrify on me and it's getting me killed. I could use this immovable pot, but I'd rather die instead, and then go complain about how OP DKs are."
leepalmer95 wrote: »Jabs doesn't work on shields either, and how many times are you realistically going to hit all 4 jabs on a half decent player?
Your lucky if you hit them 2/3 times at most. You actually have to aim jabs.
Jabs doesn't work on shields, but if were going to include passive, SA gives the user 5.2k armour on use as well.
Plus all nb's have high crit which high crit dmg. 50%+ is the min but usually i see people with 70% with 180%~ crit dmg.
Thats were SA suddenly starts doing stupid dmg.
Plus the first SA will be empowered usually. If ambushed in or the HA/SA from stealth weave will kill someone or take them to 25% hp.
Looks balanced to me.... <
( Sarcasm)
70-100% crit chance is also ridiculous in my opinion.
leepalmer95 wrote: »Jabs doesn't work on shields either, and how many times are you realistically going to hit all 4 jabs on a half decent player?
Your lucky if you hit them 2/3 times at most. You actually have to aim jabs.
Jabs doesn't work on shields, but if were going to include passive, SA gives the user 5.2k armour on use as well.
Plus all nb's have high crit which high crit dmg. 50%+ is the min but usually i see people with 70% with 180%~ crit dmg.
Thats were SA suddenly starts doing stupid dmg.
Plus the first SA will be empowered usually. If ambushed in or the HA/SA from stealth weave will kill someone or take them to 25% hp.
Looks balanced to me.... <
( Sarcasm)
70-100% crit chance is also ridiculous in my opinion.
Honestly crit chance should be capped at 30 %
Let's just assume that major fracture increases damage by 25%(It probably doesn't, but that isn't relevant).leepalmer95 wrote: »Though for some reason the fact a SA does more dmg than jabs is a bit strange considering it's instant and jabs isn't and needs to be aimed.
Just weave a light attack and your damage output is higher. Also, in this meta, burst is far superior to channels. And then comes the Major Fracture, raising the dps even more. And stun. Flame Lash got its stun removed, so why are NBs allowed to keep it?
And sorcs. They don't have one at all. How do you justify that?


Just weave a light attack and your damage output is higher. Also, in this meta, burst is far superior to channels. And then comes the Major Fracture, raising the dps even more. And stun. Flame Lash got its stun removed, so why are NBs allowed to keep it?So, Auto, you come in here telling us NBs are not OP and you try to justify that by showing off your high K/D as a Nightblade? Yeah, fail. Sorry, bud.
Nothing adds up here and the numbers are not equal. Surprise Attack hits harder than Biting Jabs and is bursty and can be cancelled for even more damage. Major Fracture does not make sense at all and we all know how Nightblades get by far the best passives.
And compare that to the Dragonknight's spam skill which got nerfed over and over again. Or the Sorcerer's... Right, they don't even have one.
Nightblades are OP, period. It's well-known. Cyrodiil isn't overrun with them because they're so prestiguous, Be honest and stop deluding other players. Vampires got nerfed, DKs got nerfed, Sorcs got Shieldbreaker. Because of people (including NBs) qq'ing. Your time has come, and you know that.
First of all, my KDR and KB streaks are not "high," and come from nearly two years of experience, not because I spam SA and cloak. I do not use either of these skills, so your argument that my boasting and "showing off" while using them is mute. The typical "just cloak away and SA" argument doesn't apply to me; These aren't ganks I'm quoting. I will be in your face in a full-on duel until one of us dies. Add to this the fact that I know there are many better players than I am, who get far higher KDRs, and the fact I can tear apart NBs on any of my other characters. This comes from experience and a thorough understanding of the class. My KDR and KB records are similar, if not higher, for my stam sorc and my dk.
The bolded portions above are both inaccurate statements. I ran an analysis of SA versus Jabs, and the data was inconclusive (post #135). I won't believe your claim to it being overpowered until you support it with data, just as I have told many others. If you've seen any of my other posts, then you know I advocate for balance where balance is due.This is my experience too. I lead dueling groups twice a week, and I have gone up against some very good players. Sometimes I win, sometimes I lose, but every fight has been fair and honest. Sorcs and DKs have several strong answers to NBs - and this includes SA and cloak.I can say short...NB is the best for this ganging, OP, but for open fights...nb isnt then OP, more OP are dk and sorc in these fight....ok nb also is so good with good player...but more open fights with good players dk and sorcs are more op than nb
go maybe to guild with organizing duels and see then duels with exp players, you will see then...dk rules in duels and sorcs
The argument that these two things are inherently OP is growing stale. The reason these calls have been made is due to a lack of understanding of the class and its weaknesses, or a lack of will to counter them (like people refusing to use detect pots). It's like saying "hey that DK is using petrify on me and it's getting me killed. I could use this immovable pot, but I'd rather die instead, and then go complain about how OP DKs are."
And sorcs. They don't have one at all. How do you justify that?
lolo_01b16_ESO wrote: »You are comparing an aoe skill to a single target skill.
In addition to that, he is comparing a single skill(jabs) to a single skill + a passive(surprise attack by itself does not do major resolve or major ward, that comes from a separate passive).
A more fair comparison would be if he added burning light passive to the jabs - that increases the damage output considerably.
[edit] hmm even without burning light the damage against a single target does not look bad for jabs.
1388 with each strike, and iirc there are three four(it's in the tooltip dummy) strikes during the channel, so 3x1388=4164 4x1388=5552
then, the closest target takes 140% more damage, so 4164 + 140% = 9993 5552 + 140% = 13324
Then you add burning light. Hmm.