Darnathian wrote: »Don't nerf cloak or buff detection pots. But please remove the "removes damage over time effects" off it for the love of god. Slot purge like everyone else. Discuss.
Darnathian wrote: »PeaNutShotz wrote: »For all the people saying go and nerf cloak. Well here is my 2 cents. Go and play a nb, use cloak to get out of a sticky situation, and see if it works 75% it doesnt, and while your pvping and using cloak do tell us how it needs to be nerfed cuz a lot of things will bring u out of cloak. So unless you play a nightblade stop your bit**ing about nerfing cloak. Otherwise nerfing sorcs, nerfing dk's, nerf, templars. For the love of god. Just pvp and play your class and learn to counter that other class!
i have every class. if you know everything exactly how can a mag dk beat a nb? if they make the dots stick then fine. leave it as is. but mark my words. there is a cloak nerf coming. no way around it. every other OP ability has been hit. Cloak is next and rightfully so.
Only thing I'd consider nerfing about cloak is the removal of DoTs.
Would reduce it to 2 at all ranks, that'd also make the other morph actually attractive, and stop screwing DoT builds that much.
MrGigglypants wrote: »Only thing I'd consider nerfing about cloak is the removal of DoTs.
Would reduce it to 2 at all ranks, that'd also make the other morph actually attractive, and stop screwing DoT builds that much.
Use aoes. Reapply dots. Stam dk crushes stam nb all day green dragons blood beats cloak everytime unless the person playing the dk is clueless. Beating cloak is a L2p issue.
MrGigglypants wrote: »Only thing I'd consider nerfing about cloak is the removal of DoTs.
Would reduce it to 2 at all ranks, that'd also make the other morph actually attractive, and stop screwing DoT builds that much.
Use aoes. Reapply dots. Stam dk crushes stam nb all day green dragons blood beats cloak everytime unless the person playing the dk is clueless. Beating cloak is a L2p issue.
...When did I say it was about stam DKs?
No, the intended target is definitely magicka DKs, since stam DKs almost never use more than 2 DoTs.
...And mentioning GDB on a stam DK makes me wonder who is the one who has to L2P here...
And not just that, when was the last time you saw a competitive DoT build in Cyro? On my side: never.
MrGigglypants wrote: »Darnathian wrote: »PeaNutShotz wrote: »For all the people saying go and nerf cloak. Well here is my 2 cents. Go and play a nb, use cloak to get out of a sticky situation, and see if it works 75% it doesnt, and while your pvping and using cloak do tell us how it needs to be nerfed cuz a lot of things will bring u out of cloak. So unless you play a nightblade stop your bit**ing about nerfing cloak. Otherwise nerfing sorcs, nerfing dk's, nerf, templars. For the love of god. Just pvp and play your class and learn to counter that other class!
i have every class. if you know everything exactly how can a mag dk beat a nb? if they make the dots stick then fine. leave it as is. but mark my words. there is a cloak nerf coming. no way around it. every other OP ability has been hit. Cloak is next and rightfully so.
Cloak has so many counters. Mag dk just talons the NB and he's done for if he tries to "spam" cloak. It's literally a L2p issue steel tornado Impulse caltrops are all more than effective.
MrGigglypants wrote: »Only thing I'd consider nerfing about cloak is the removal of DoTs.
Would reduce it to 2 at all ranks, that'd also make the other morph actually attractive, and stop screwing DoT builds that much.
Use aoes. Reapply dots. Stam dk crushes stam nb all day green dragons blood beats cloak everytime unless the person playing the dk is clueless. Beating cloak is a L2p issue.
MrGigglypants wrote: »Only thing I'd consider nerfing about cloak is the removal of DoTs.
Would reduce it to 2 at all ranks, that'd also make the other morph actually attractive, and stop screwing DoT builds that much.
Use aoes. Reapply dots. Stam dk crushes stam nb all day green dragons blood beats cloak everytime unless the person playing the dk is clueless. Beating cloak is a L2p issue.
bowmanz607 wrote: »MrGigglypants wrote: »Only thing I'd consider nerfing about cloak is the removal of DoTs.
Would reduce it to 2 at all ranks, that'd also make the other morph actually attractive, and stop screwing DoT builds that much.
Use aoes. Reapply dots. Stam dk crushes stam nb all day green dragons blood beats cloak everytime unless the person playing the dk is clueless. Beating cloak is a L2p issue.
...When did I say it was about stam DKs?
No, the intended target is definitely magicka DKs, since stam DKs almost never use more than 2 DoTs.
...And mentioning GDB on a stam DK makes me wonder who is the one who has to L2P here...
And not just that, when was the last time you saw a competitive DoT build in Cyro? On my side: never.
There is not really any compete time dot builds because that territory belongs to a Magika dk which is useless right now.
I also agree with green dragon blood. A useless ability right now and it needs to be fixed. That is a key ability for dk that was ruined.
bowmanz607 wrote: »hammayolettuce wrote: »Cloak in itself is worlds better than streak as an escape.
*
Streak is not countered by AoE's, Piercing Mark or pots
@Prabooo nope you are right it's actually countered by debuff, gap closers, long range attacks, negate, silence, speed buffs and other sorcerers.
Are you trying to say streak should have as many counters as cloak or vice versa? Because either way your argument is fail.
Comparing cloak to streak is like comparing apples to oranges. In the end they are both round fruits that basically do the same thing with small differences and a different flavor.
bowmanz607 wrote: »hammayolettuce wrote: »Cloak in itself is worlds better than streak as an escape.
*
Streak is not countered by AoE's, Piercing Mark or pots
@Prabooo nope you are right it's actually countered by debuff, gap closers, long range attacks, negate, silence, speed buffs and other sorcerers.
Are you trying to say streak should have as many counters as cloak or vice versa? Because either way your argument is fail.
Comparing cloak to streak is like comparing apples to oranges. In the end they are both round fruits that basically do the same thing with small differences and a different flavor.
It's convenient to argue that they are apples and oranges when the argument doesn't suit cloak.
bowmanz607 wrote: »bowmanz607 wrote: »hammayolettuce wrote: »Cloak in itself is worlds better than streak as an escape.
*
Streak is not countered by AoE's, Piercing Mark or pots
@Prabooo nope you are right it's actually countered by debuff, gap closers, long range attacks, negate, silence, speed buffs and other sorcerers.
Are you trying to say streak should have as many counters as cloak or vice versa? Because either way your argument is fail.
Comparing cloak to streak is like comparing apples to oranges. In the end they are both round fruits that basically do the same thing with small differences and a different flavor.
It's convenient to argue that they are apples and oranges when the argument doesn't suit cloak.
Look at my previous comment where I broke down each skill side by side.
bowmanz607 wrote: »bowmanz607 wrote: »hammayolettuce wrote: »Cloak in itself is worlds better than streak as an escape.
*
Streak is not countered by AoE's, Piercing Mark or pots
@Prabooo nope you are right it's actually countered by debuff, gap closers, long range attacks, negate, silence, speed buffs and other sorcerers.
Are you trying to say streak should have as many counters as cloak or vice versa? Because either way your argument is fail.
Comparing cloak to streak is like comparing apples to oranges. In the end they are both round fruits that basically do the same thing with small differences and a different flavor.
It's convenient to argue that they are apples and oranges when the argument doesn't suit cloak.
Look at my previous comment where I broke down each skill side by side.
K well now you are just being confusing because saying something is apples/oranges infers they are different categories of thigs not that they are the same.
bowmanz607 wrote: »bowmanz607 wrote: »bowmanz607 wrote: »hammayolettuce wrote: »Cloak in itself is worlds better than streak as an escape.
*
Streak is not countered by AoE's, Piercing Mark or pots
@Prabooo nope you are right it's actually countered by debuff, gap closers, long range attacks, negate, silence, speed buffs and other sorcerers.
Are you trying to say streak should have as many counters as cloak or vice versa? Because either way your argument is fail.
Comparing cloak to streak is like comparing apples to oranges. In the end they are both round fruits that basically do the same thing with small differences and a different flavor.
It's convenient to argue that they are apples and oranges when the argument doesn't suit cloak.
Look at my previous comment where I broke down each skill side by side.
K well now you are just being confusing because saying something is apples/oranges infers they are different categories of thigs not that they are the same.
I'm sorry you don't understand but it is pretty straight forward.
I am saying both abilities fall within a similar category but branch out into sub categories which makes them unique.
Apples and oranges are in the same category (fruit) but are still part of separate sub categories that make them unique.
The point being that comparing the two abilities is simply just picking the type of fruit you prefer depending in your prefrence. Both abilities operate in a similar fashion. But still have different flavors. Both abilities operate in a similar way but add a different flavor to the fight.
It is just a saying. The point I am trying to make is stop yelling about how one is better than the other. Or this does that but this doesnt. They both essentially are the same and it depends on which you prefer.
SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »@Tryxus You have no excuses left. There's not a single thing that can be said to justify the state of the current nightblade class. It is easy to pull you out of cloak, yes but nothing prevents you from roll dodge once and cloak again, and again and again. And no, being stamina wont make it harder. Also all you need is 3 (soammable) abilities to be fully buffed and have me with at least 4 different debuffs. "The most balanced class buff the others" wont cut it anymore.
Actually, I still have 1 argument left to defend Cloak. Wanna hear it? OK...
Remember the ol' day when the game just came out of beta? The NB was the worst class in the game, even worse than Templar. Hard to imagine, right? And you know why the NB was the worst? Because the Cloak back then didn't remove DoT effects and was removed instantly when the NB got hit by that
Now, as a MagBlade I know that Cloak can keep us invisible since we have a large amount of Magicka that can keep us Cloaked. Which is exactly why I suggested that Reduced (not 0%) Magicka Regen while Cloaked mechanic. But I'm actually having 2nd thoughts about that since my Magicka is alrdy being drained by the continuous use of Cloak during combat. I'd have to run a sustain build if they change it like that, but then I'd have to sacrifice Spell Damage which makes my ganking abilities non-existant
Which is also an argument: gankers don't run sustain builds. They buff their damage to such lvls that their regen sux. It's a compromise we have to make. So if the gank fails, then what should we do? Fight on, or cloak away? True, we can make sustain builds, but what's the point of the stealth passive or the extra effects we receive from skills that we can receive only during stealth? We'd be mere fighters weaker than DK since we don't have their resource managent or mages weaker than Sorcs since we can't reach their Spell Damage without going stealth.
StamBlades? 3 Cloaks, that's all. And if you've seen some of the videos like those of Strider Roshin, you'd have noticed that Cloak can be rather unreliable.
The reasons I'm calling NB "The Most Balanced" class are the following:
- Capable of running viable Magicka and Stamina builds: this is something the other classes are lacking. Mag DKs, Stam Sorcs and both Templars have it hard. Stam Sorcs are in a pretty good spot due to receiving the right stamina Morphs, but would be better with a passives review for stamina builds, removal of pet skills and a Stamina Morph of their Execute. Mag DK's just need the right skills: Stonefist Execute, stronger Whip,... and Templars need serious fixing and buffing.
- Doing their jobs: NB are assassins, so they're supposed to be gankers/one shotters/etc. We strike from the shadows, kill the weakest link and go right back to the shadows.
- A hard-pressed class in 1vs1: yes they are. NB have good duelling skills, but if you think about: Sorcs have shields which can't be crit or receive a DoT, DK's are too tanky and with most NB being Vamp their fire attacks will hurt like Oblivion and Templars can outlast the NB with their heals
All in all, I'd say ZOS did a good job on the NB, and now needs to focus on buffing the other classes so they can run both Magicka and Stamina builds in PvP.
I'm actually hoping that the Great Class Overhaul in January will put the other classes on the same lvl as us. NB need no nerfing, we're capable of being the assassins we're supposed to be. Rather, NB needs to be used as a template for the other classes so they can be buffed the same way and run good Magicka and Stamina builds once again.
You're in denial. That's it. I don't blame you though. This so called "ganking builds" don't exist anymore. It's easy to reach 4k weapon damage and 2k+ regen and believe me 2k stam regen is al you need to have good sustain . So yes you can gank someone, fail, but who cares? Why would you retreat when you have so many debuffs in a few spammable skills. And no, 3 cloaks for stam NBs is not all they can do. Watch any streamer playing stamina nightblade I can asure you they do cloak whenever they want. This 3 cloak thing is a lie. With a drink and willows path you get over 1k magicka regen on a stamina nightblade. Im 99% sure Nightblades will get nerfed and m hoping its a big one so we can see more diversity in Cyrodiil.
You could argue that sorcerers are op too, and yes they are but at least there are not sorcerers behind every freaking rock in cyrodiil. Also I have yet to fight a sorcerer using cheap tactics, like when 1v1 if im winning the fight they could try to escape but they never do and they just lose the fight with honor. Nightblades on the other side... They will cloak, ambush to a mob then cloak then aggro a boss then cloak and it's so frustrating.
Tryxus, NB's were bad at launch not because of cloak not purging dots, they were bad since many of their skills flat out didn't work in combat with multiple opponents. ZOS gave NB's bug fixes and pity buffs (see Refreshing Shadow and the old potion passive) and now that they are both fixed and buffed they are very powerful. If not for the bugs, not design decisions, NB's would have been a solid class since day 1.
hammayolettuce wrote: »Cloak in itself is worlds better than streak as an escape.
*
Streak is not countered by AoE's, Piercing Mark or pots
@Prabooo nope you are right it's actually countered by debuff, gap closers, long range attacks, negate, silence, speed buffs and other sorcerers.
Are you trying to say streak should have as many counters as cloak or vice versa? Because either way your argument is fail.